Mohamed E El-Abtah1, Pratik Talati1, Jorg Dietrich2, Elizabeth R Gerstner2, Eva-Maria Ratai1. 1. Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Massachusetts General Hospital, Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
Background: The impact of anti-angiogenic therapy (AAT) on patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is unclear due to a disconnect between radiographic findings and overall survivorship. MR spectroscopy (MRS) can provide clinically relevant information regarding tumor metabolism in response to AAT. This review explores the use of MRS to track metabolic changes in patients with GBM treated with AAT. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to identify primary research articles that reported metabolic changes in GBMs treated with AAT. Collected variables included single or multi-voxel MRS acquisition parameters, metabolic markers, reported metabolic changes in response to AAT, and survivorship data. Results: Thirty-five articles were retrieved in the initial query. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 11 studies with 262 patients were included for qualitative synthesis with all studies performed using multi-voxel 1H MRS. Two studies utilized 31P MRS. Post-AAT initiation, shorter-term survivors had increased choline (cellular proliferation marker), increased lactate (a hypoxia marker), and decreased levels of the short echo time (TE) marker, myo-inositol (an osmoregulator and gliosis marker). MRS detected metabolic changes as soon as 1-day after AAT, and throughout the course of AAT, to predict survival. There was substantial heterogeneity in the timing of scans, which ranged from 1-day to 6-9 months after AAT initiation. Conclusions: Multi-voxel MRS at intermediate and short TE can serve as a robust prognosticator of outcomes of patients with GBM who are treated with AAT.
Background: The impact of anti-angiogenic therapy (AAT) on patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is unclear due to a disconnect between radiographic findings and overall survivorship. MR spectroscopy (MRS) can provide clinically relevant information regarding tumor metabolism in response to AAT. This review explores the use of MRS to track metabolic changes in patients with GBM treated with AAT. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines to identify primary research articles that reported metabolic changes in GBMs treated with AAT. Collected variables included single or multi-voxel MRS acquisition parameters, metabolic markers, reported metabolic changes in response to AAT, and survivorship data. Results: Thirty-five articles were retrieved in the initial query. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 11 studies with 262 patients were included for qualitative synthesis with all studies performed using multi-voxel 1H MRS. Two studies utilized 31P MRS. Post-AAT initiation, shorter-term survivors had increased choline (cellular proliferation marker), increased lactate (a hypoxia marker), and decreased levels of the short echo time (TE) marker, myo-inositol (an osmoregulator and gliosis marker). MRS detected metabolic changes as soon as 1-day after AAT, and throughout the course of AAT, to predict survival. There was substantial heterogeneity in the timing of scans, which ranged from 1-day to 6-9 months after AAT initiation. Conclusions: Multi-voxel MRS at intermediate and short TE can serve as a robust prognosticator of outcomes of patients with GBM who are treated with AAT.
Authors: Elke Hattingen; Heinrich Lanfermann; Johanna Quick; Kea Franz; Friedhelm E Zanella; Ulrich Pilatus Journal: MAGMA Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Eva-Maria Ratai; Zheng Zhang; Bradley S Snyder; Jerrold L Boxerman; Yair Safriel; Robert C McKinstry; Felix Bokstein; Mark R Gilbert; A Gregory Sorensen; Daniel P Barboriak Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2013-05-03 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: J Y Jeon; I Kovanlikaya; J A Boockvar; X Mao; B Shin; J K Burkhardt; K Kesavabhotla; P Christos; H Riina; D C Shungu; A J Tsiouris Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Sarah J Nelson; Yan Li; Janine M Lupo; Marram Olson; Jason C Crane; Annette Molinaro; Ritu Roy; Jennifer Clarke; Nicholas Butowski; Michael Prados; Soonmee Cha; Susan M Chang Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Ovidiu C Andronesi; Morteza Esmaeili; Ronald J H Borra; Kyrre Emblem; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Marco C Pinho; Scott R Plotkin; Andrew S Chi; April F Eichler; Jorg Dietrich; S Percy Ivy; Patrick Y Wen; Dan G Duda; Rakesh Jain; Bruce R Rosen; Gregory A Sorensen; Tracy T Batchelor Journal: NPJ Precis Oncol Date: 2017-06-12
Authors: Maria Laura Falchetti; Quintino Giorgio D'Alessandris; Simone Pacioni; Mariachiara Buccarelli; Liliana Morgante; Stefano Giannetti; Valentina Lulli; Maurizio Martini; Luigi Maria Larocca; Eliza Vakana; Louis Stancato; Lucia Ricci-Vitiani; Roberto Pallini Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2018-12-16 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Dong-Ho Ha; Sunseob Choi; Jong Young Oh; Seong Kuk Yoon; Myong Jin Kang; Ki-Uk Kim Journal: Korean J Radiol Date: 2013-05-02 Impact factor: 3.500