Literature DB >> 35890972

A Feasibility Study on Deep Learning Based Brain Tumor Segmentation Using 2D Ellipse Box Areas.

Muhaddisa Barat Ali1, Xiaohan Bai1, Irene Yu-Hua Gu1, Mitchel S Berger2, Asgeir Store Jakola3,4.   

Abstract

In most deep learning-based brain tumor segmentation methods, training the deep network requires annotated tumor areas. However, accurate tumor annotation puts high demands on medical personnel. The aim of this study is to train a deep network for segmentation by using ellipse box areas surrounding the tumors. In the proposed method, the deep network is trained by using a large number of unannotated tumor images with foreground (FG) and background (BG) ellipse box areas surrounding the tumor and background, and a small number of patients (<20) with annotated tumors. The training is conducted by initial training on two ellipse boxes on unannotated MRIs, followed by refined training on a small number of annotated MRIs. We use a multi-stream U-Net for conducting our experiments, which is an extension of the conventional U-Net. This enables the use of complementary information from multi-modality (e.g., T1, T1ce, T2, and FLAIR) MRIs. To test the feasibility of the proposed approach, experiments and evaluation were conducted on two datasets for glioma segmentation. Segmentation performance on the test sets is then compared with those used on the same network but trained entirely by annotated MRIs. Our experiments show that the proposed method has obtained good tumor segmentation results on the test sets, wherein the dice score on tumor areas is (0.8407, 0.9104), and segmentation accuracy on tumor areas is (83.88%, 88.47%) for the MICCAI BraTS'17 and US datasets, respectively. Comparing the segmented results by using the network trained by all annotated tumors, the drop in the segmentation performance from the proposed approach is (0.0594, 0.0159) in the dice score, and (8.78%, 2.61%) in segmented tumor accuracy for MICCAI and US test sets, which is relatively small. Our case studies have demonstrated that training the network for segmentation by using ellipse box areas in place of all annotated tumors is feasible, and can be considered as an alternative, which is a trade-off between saving medical experts' time annotating tumors and a small drop in segmentation performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  2D ellipse box areas; MR images; brain tumors; deep learning; glioma segmentation; multi-stream U-Net

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35890972      PMCID: PMC9317052          DOI: 10.3390/s22145292

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sensors (Basel)        ISSN: 1424-8220            Impact factor:   3.847


  14 in total

1.  Intra- and interoperator variations in region-of-interest drawing and their effect on the measurement of glomerular filtration rates.

Authors:  D R White; A S Houston; W F Sampson; G P Wilkins
Journal:  Clin Nucl Med       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 7.794

2.  Brain tumor segmentation based on deep learning and an attention mechanism using MRI multi-modalities brain images.

Authors:  Ramin Ranjbarzadeh; Abbas Bagherian Kasgari; Saeid Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi; Shokofeh Anari; Maryam Naseri; Malika Bendechache
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Intra-rater variability in low-grade glioma segmentation.

Authors:  Hans Kristian Bø; Ole Solheim; Asgeir Store Jakola; Kjell-Arne Kvistad; Ingerid Reinertsen; Erik Magnus Berntsen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration.

Authors:  Brian B Avants; Nicholas J Tustison; Gang Song; Philip A Cook; Arno Klein; James C Gee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-09-17       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Introduction to Deep Learning in Clinical Neuroscience.

Authors:  Eddie de Dios; Muhaddisa Barat Ali; Irene Yu-Hua Gu; Tomás Gomez Vecchio; Chenjie Ge; Asgeir S Jakola
Journal:  Acta Neurochir Suppl       Date:  2022

6.  Weakly Supervised 3D Semantic Segmentation Using Cross-Image Consensus and Inter-Voxel Affinity Relations.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Zhu; Jeffrey Chen; Xiangrui Zeng; Junwei Liang; Chengqi Li; Sinuo Liu; Sima Behpour; Min Xu
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis       Date:  2021-10

7.  Prediction of glioma-subtypes: comparison of performance on a DL classifier using bounding box areas versus annotated tumors.

Authors:  Muhaddisa Barat Ali; Irene Yu-Hua Gu; Alice Lidemar; Mitchel S Berger; Georg Widhalm; Asgeir Store Jakola
Journal:  BMC Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-05-19

8.  Brain tumor segmentation with Deep Neural Networks.

Authors:  Mohammad Havaei; Axel Davy; David Warde-Farley; Antoine Biard; Aaron Courville; Yoshua Bengio; Chris Pal; Pierre-Marc Jodoin; Hugo Larochelle
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 8.545

Review 9.  FSL.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  3D-BoxSup: Positive-Unlabeled Learning of Brain Tumor Segmentation Networks From 3D Bounding Boxes.

Authors:  Yanwu Xu; Mingming Gong; Junxiang Chen; Ziye Chen; Kayhan Batmanghelich
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.