| Literature DB >> 35890955 |
Syed Agha Hassnain Mohsan1, Muhammad Asghar Khan2, Mohammed H Alsharif3, Peerapong Uthansakul4, Ahmed A A Solyman5.
Abstract
An intelligent reflecting surface (IRS) can intelligently configure wavefronts such as amplitude, frequency, phase, and even polarization through passive reflections and without requiring any radio frequency (RF) chains. It is predicted to be a revolutionizing technology with the capability to alter wireless communication to enhance both spectrum and energy efficiencies with low expenditure and low energy consumption. Similarly, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) communication has attained a significant interest by research fraternity due to high mobility, flexible deployment, and easy integration with other technologies. However, UAV communication can face obstructions and eavesdropping in real-time scenarios. Recently, it is envisaged that IRS and UAV can combine together to achieve unparalleled opportunities in difficult environments. Both technologies can achieve enhanced performance by proactively altering the wireless propagation through maneuver control and smart signal reflections in three-dimensional space. This study briefly discusses IRS-assisted UAV communications. We survey the existing literature on this emerging research topic for both ground and airborne scenarios. We highlight several emerging technologies and application scenarios for future wireless networks. This study goes one step further to elaborate research opportunities to design and optimize wireless systems with low energy footprint and at low cost. Finally, we shed some light on open challenges and future research directions for IRS-assisted UAV communication.Entities:
Keywords: IRS-assisted UAV; intelligent reflecting surface (IRS); passive reflections; radio frequency; unmanned aerial vehicle
Year: 2022 PMID: 35890955 PMCID: PMC9322292 DOI: 10.3390/s22145278
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.847
Figure 1Main functionalities of IRS to reconfigure wireless propagation. (a) IRS for coverage extension; (b) IRS to enhance channel rank condition; (c) IRS to refine channel statistics; (d) IRS to suppress interference.
Figure 2IRS-assisted UAV communication [23].
Existing works combining UAV and IRS.
| Reference | Aim | Optimization Variable | UAV Mobility | IRS Installation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | To maximize the average achievable rate | UAV trajectory, IRS passive beamforming, | Mobile | At the building |
| [ | To maximize the IRS data transmission | IRS scheduling, IRS phase shift, UAV trajectory | Mobile | At the building |
| [ | To maximize the received power | IRS passive beamforming, beamforming and trajectory of UAV | Mobile | At the building |
| [ | To maximize the secrecy rate | IRS phase shift, power control of UAV, trajectory | Mobile | At the building |
| [ | To maximize the rate of strong user | Location, phase shift and beamforming of IRS-UAV | Static | At the UAV |
| [ | To maximize the transmission capacity | Reflection and location parameters of IRS-UAV | Static | At the UAV |
Figure 3IRS-assisted UAV communication in the presence of eavesdropper.
IRS-assisted UAV communication scenarios.
| Reference | System Components | Channel Model | Design Characteristics | Metric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | UAV, IRS, user | Line-of-sight | UAV trajectory and velocity, IRS phase shift | Average total power consumption |
| [ | UAV, IRS, BS | Rician | UAV trajectory, IRS scheduling, IRS phase shift matrix | weighted |
| [ | UAV, IRS, user | Rician, Raleigh, LOS | UAV trajectory, IRS phase shift, linear precoding | Signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) |
| [ | UAV, IRS, user | Rayleigh, free-space pathloss | UAV trajectory, IRS phase shift, linear precoding | Average capacity, average BER, Outage probability |
| [ | UAV, IRS, mobile users | 3GPP | UAV trajectory, IRS phase shift, precoding | Energy consumption minimization |
| [ | UAV, IRS, user | Rician | UAV trajectory, IRS phase shift | Average energy consumption |
| [ | UAV, IRS, user | Multipath channel | UAV trajectory, IRS phase shift, precoding, analogue beamforming, user scheduling | Sum rate |
| [ | UAV, IRS, user | mmWave channel | UAV trajectory, IRS phase shift, precoding | Sum secrecy rate |
| [ | UAV, IRS, user | Rician, LOS | UAV trajectory, IRS phase shift | Bit-error-rate (BER) |
| [ | UAV, IRS, user | mmWave channel | UAV trajectory, IRS phase shift | Weighted data rate and geographical fairness |
Figure 4Basic hardware architecture of IRS.
Different techniques to realize reconfigurable metasurfaces.
| Reference | Tuning Technique | Material | Characteristics | Spectrum | Modulation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [ | Capacitance | PIN diode/varactor | Reprogrammable | MHz-GHz | NA/100 KHz |
| [ | Mechanics | NEMS/MEMS | Modulator | GHz-visible | 31%/1 KHz |
| [ | Phase transition | VO2 | Modulator | THz-visible | 20%/NA |
| [ | Phase transition | Liquid crystals | Color filter/beam deflector/modulator | GHz-visible | 12°/NA |
| [ | Carrier | Graphene | Absorber/polarizer | THz-NIR | 243°/NA |
| [ | Carrier | Semiconductors | Modulator | THz-visible | 90%/NA |
Figure 5EM reflection via PIN diodes.
Academic and industrial projects on intelligent reflecting surfaces.
| Year & Reference | Research Project | Aim/Objective | Product |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 [ | VisorSurf | It aims to develop a hardware architecture for software-driven metasurface |
|
| 2017 [ | Reconfigureable active Hygen’s metalens | To achieve efficient manipulation of the impinging wavefront |
|
| 2018 [ | NTT DOCOMO and Metawave | To support 5G data transmission of 28 GHz-band using metasurfaces reflectarray |
|
| 2020 [ | Rfocus | Largest number of antennas used for for a single link communication |
|
| 2020 [ | RIS-based MIMO QAM | To demonstrate an RIS framework to attain amplitude-and-phase-varying modulation, which supports the architecture of MIMO quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) transmission. |
|
| 2020 [ | NTT DOCOMO and AGC Inc. | It aims to design first ever prototype of transparent dynamic metasurface for 5G. |
|
Figure 6Controlling EM reflection via varactor-tuned resonators.
Research contributions on UAVs.
| Reference | Year | Research Focus |
|---|---|---|
| [ | 2020 | This study focuses on UAV applications, challenges, regulations, and future research aspects. Specifically, it highlights issues regarding trajectory, energy harvesting, security, interference and collision avoidance. |
| [ | 2020 | This study is focused on UAVs for three different perspectives including swarms, sensors and communications. |
| [ | 2020 | This study focuses on several application scenarios of multi-UAV systems. Additionally, it highlights nomenclature taxonomy, architecture, current trends and potential challenges. |
| [ | 2021 | This article comprehensively surveys green UAV communications, energy consumption models, applications, common trends and research challenges. |
| [ | 2021 | This article focuses on UAV prototype, experimental demonstration, channel models and energy consumption models. Moreover, it also outlines various future research directions for UAVs. |
| [ | 2021 | This work is based on deep learning tools to detect vehicles using UAV aerial images. It addresses optimization methods, reduction of computation overhead and accuracy enhancement. This work provides guidelines for researchers in artificial intelligence and traffic surveillance domains. |
| [ | 2022 | This study focuses on optimization algorithms e.g., Chicken Swarm Optimization Clustering, bee optimization algorithm, and genetic algorithm which are the gateway to better reliability, performance and accuracy. It also addresses protocols, routing schemes and associated challenges. |
| [ | 2022 | This study surveys various task assignment algorithms in the context of main ideas, benefits, drawbacks and operational features. These algorithms are compared on the basis of performance factors and characteristics. This study also discusses challenges, open issues, and possible future research directions. |
Figure 7Solar-powered drones (a) Google’s project, (b) Facebook’s project [65].
Figure 8Illustration of a UAV-IRS-assisted MEC application scenario.
Figure 9UAV-based IRS-assisted RF/FSO communication.
Figure 10IRS-assisted UAV communication for extended coverage.
Figure 11IRS-assisted UAV for spectrum sharing [23].
Figure 12An IRS-assisted UAV system in the presence of eavesdropper.
Figure 13Secrecy capacity of IRS-assisted UAV system (a) impact of increasing transmit power at the UAV and (b) impact of increasing number of increasing elements of IRS [96].
Existing works on IRS enabled PLS for UAV communication [96].
| PLS Aspect | UAV Aspect | IRS Aspect | Scenario | Results |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maximize secrecy rate [ | Power control, trajectory control | Phase shift control | Single eavesdropper, UAV to single receiver | Enhanced secrecy rate |
| Maximize secrecy rate [ | Position design, Beamforming design | Position design, beamforming design | Single eavesdropper, UAV BS to receiver | Enhanced secrecy rate |
| Maximize secrecy rate [ | Position design, power control | Phase shift control | Single eavesdropper, UAV to ground user | Enhanced secrecy rate |
| Maximize secure EE [ | Trajectory design, power control | User association, phase shift control | Single eavesdropper, IRS equipped UAV, BS to users | Enhanced secure EE |
| Maximize secrecy rate [ | Trajectory design | Beamforming design | Single eavesdropper, UAV to ground user | Enhanced secrecy rate |
| Maximize secrecy rate [ | Position design | Phase shift control | Single eavesdropper, BS to users | Enhanced secrecy rate |
Figure 14An overview of IRS-empowered UAV in smart cities (modified from [76]).
Figure 15IoUT assisted by IRS-assisted UAV, motivated by [107].
Figure 16Crucial challenges in IRS channel estimation.