Literature DB >> 3589077

Assessing social networks and social support in epidemiologic studies.

L F Berkman.   

Abstract

Epidemiologists and other researchers in the biomedical field have recently recognized the potential importance of social networks and the support they provide in maintaining health and well being. However, measuring social networks and social support has not proven to be easy, measures are generally not well validated and critical dimensions or characteristics of networks have yet to be identified. The aim of this paper is to provide the reader with some background on the work being done in this area. In particular, attention is devoted to why, historically, social networks have been suspected of playing a role in disease causation, what some important characteristics of networks are likely to be, examples of measures currently in use, and what the biological pathways are that may link networks to morbidity and mortality. A description of the Alameda County Study in California is given. In this study, people who were socially isolated were found to be over twice as likely to die in a nine-year follow-up period as those with many contacts. This increased risk was found to be independent of alcohol and cigarette consumption, obesity and other health practices.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3589077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique        ISSN: 0398-7620            Impact factor:   1.019


  5 in total

1.  Social network interaction: new jargon in health inequalities.

Authors:  J Fox
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1988-08-06

2.  Neighbourhood social participation and women's use of anxiolytic-hypnotic drugs: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  K Johnell; J Merlo; J Lynch; G Blennow
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Social networks and risk of neural tube defects.

Authors:  Suzan L Carmichael; Gary M Shaw; Eric Neri; Donna M Schaffer; Steve Selvin
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 8.082

4.  Country of birth, socioeconomic position, and healthcare expenditure: a multilevel analysis of Malmö, Sweden.

Authors:  A Beckman; J Merlo; J W Lynch; U-G Gerdtham; M Lindström; T Lithman
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Living alone is a risk factor for mortality in men but not women from the general population: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ulla Kandler; Christa Meisinger; Jens Baumert; Hannelore Löwel
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 3.295

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.