| Literature DB >> 35890697 |
Zhikang Yuan1,2, Cheng Wang3, Lijun Jin1, Youping Tu2, Yingyao Zhang1, Zhenlian An1, Yongfei Zhao2.
Abstract
Water invasion induced aging and degradation of the unidirectional glass fiber reinforced epoxy resin (UGFRE) rod is inferred as the primary reason for the decay-like fracture of the composite insulator. In this paper, the moisture diffusion processes in the UGFRE from different directions at various test humidities and temperatures are studied. The moisture diffusion of the UGFRE sample obeys the Langmuir diffusion law under the humidity conditions of 53%, 82% and 100% at 40 °C. In deionized water, the moisture diffusion of the UGFRE sample also obeys the Langmuir diffusion law when the invading direction is vertical to the glass fiber. However, when the water invades the UGFRE sample, parallel with the glass fiber, the weight loss caused by composite degradation should not be neglected. A modified Langmuir model, taking Arrhenius Theory and the nonlinear aging characteristic of the composite into consideration, is proposed and can successfully describe the moisture diffusion process. Both the glass fibers and epoxy resin will degrade in the deionized water. The glass fibers show better resistance to degradation than the epoxy resin. The epoxy resin degrades from the glass fiber/epoxy resin interface and become fragments. For composite insulators, the water invasion through the ends should be avoided as far as possible, or the degradation of the UGFRE rod will result in decay-like fracture.Entities:
Keywords: composite degradation; modified Langmuir model; moisture diffusion; unidirectional glass fiber reinforced epoxy resin (UGFRE)
Year: 2022 PMID: 35890697 PMCID: PMC9324177 DOI: 10.3390/polym14142922
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Polymers (Basel) ISSN: 2073-4360 Impact factor: 4.967
Figure 1Obtaining methods and schematic diagrams of sample Type I and Type II.
Figure 2Surface micro morphology of the sample. (a) Type I and (b) Type II.
Figure 3The appearance of the three types of samples.
The test conditions.
| Temperature | Test Humidity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 53% | 82% | 100% | In Deionized Water | |
| 40 °C | √ | √ | √ | √ |
| 60 °C | √ | |||
| 80 °C | √ | |||
Figure 4Weight changes of the samples under different environment humidities at 40 °C. (a) Type I; (b) Type II; (c) Type III.
Figure 5Weight changes of the samples in deionized water under different temperatures. (a) Type I; (b) Type II; (c) Type III.
Figure 6Weight changes of the samples fitted by the modified Langmuir model. (a) 40 °C; (b) 60 °C; (c) 80 °C.
Figure 7The micro morphology of the Type II sample after 480 h in the deionized water. (a) side view, magnified 500 times; (b) side view, magnified 2500 times; (c) cross section view, magnified 500 times; (d) cross section view, magnified 2500 times.