| Literature DB >> 35890289 |
Nilesh R Rarokar1, Sunil S Menghani2, Deweshri R Kerzare3, Pramod B Khedekar1, Ashish P Bharne1, Abdulhakeem S Alamri4,5, Walaa F Alsanie4,5, Majid Alhomrani4,5, Nagaraja Sreeharsha6,7, Syed Mohammed Basheeruddin Asdaq8.
Abstract
The present research was aimed to develop a terbinafin hydrochloride (TH)-encapsulated solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) hydrogel for improved antifungal efficacy. TH-loaded SLNs were obtained from glyceryl monostearate (lipid) and Pluronic® F68 (surfactant) employing high-pressure homogenization. The ratio of drug with respect to lipid was optimized, considering factors such as desired particle size and highest percent encapsulation efficiency. Lyophilized SLNs were then incorporated in the hydrogel prepared from 0.2-1.0% w/v carbopol 934P and further evaluated for rheological parameters. The z-average, zeta potential and polydispersity index were found to be 241.3 nm, -15.2 mV and 0.415, respectively. The SLNs show a higher entrapment efficiency of about 98.36%, with 2.12 to 6.3602% drug loading. SEM images, XRD and the results of the DSC, FTIR show successful preparation of SLNs after freeze drying. The TH-loaded SLNs hydrogel showed sustained drug release (95.47 ± 1.45%) over a period of 24 h. The results reported in this study show a significant effect on the zone of inhibition than the marketed formulation and pure drug in Candida albicans cultures, with better physical stability at cooler temperatures. It helped to enhance skin deposition inthe ex vivostudy and improved, in vitro and in vivo, the antifungal activity.Entities:
Keywords: Candida albicans; antifungal; hydrogel; solid lipid nanoparticles; terbinafin
Year: 2022 PMID: 35890289 PMCID: PMC9320640 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14071393
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceutics ISSN: 1999-4923 Impact factor: 6.525
Figure 1Differentialscanning calorimetric thermograms showing the endothermic peak of terbinafin hydrochloride (A); glyceryle monostearate (B); physical mixture of terbinafin hydrochloride (TH) and glyceryle monostearate (GM) (C); and lyophilized solid lipid nanoparticles (D).
Figure 2FTIR spectrum of pure TH (A), glyceryl monostearate (B), physical mixture of TH and GMS (C).
Characterization of the formulated SLNs.
| Formulation Code | Particle Size (nm) | Zeta Potential (mV) | Polydispersity Index | % Drug Loading | % Encapsulation Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P F 1 | 241.3 | −15.2 | 0.415 | 6.3602 | 98.36 |
| P F 2 | 248.7 | −18.1 | 0.47 | 4.2192 | 97.84 |
| P F 3 | 274.7 | −19.4 | 0.542 | 3.1652 | 97.49 |
| P F 4 | 302.4 | −20.2 | 0.577 | 2.5322 | 96.89 |
| P F 5 | 321.8 | −24.8 | 0.543 | 2.12 | 95.39 |
Figure 3Scanning electron microscopy images showing the hexagonal crystalline form of TH (A) with varying sizes of particles and longitudinal amorphous structures, which confirm the formation of SLNs (B).
Figure 4X-ray diffractogram of TH shows sharp peaks at diffraction angles (2θ) with the typical crystalline pattern (A), csrystalline pattern of physical Mixture of glyceryl monosterate (B) and Freezed Dried SLNs preparation (C).
Figure 5Formulations showed pseudo-plastic flow behavior. Rheological behaviors of the TH-loaded SLNs containing the carbopol hydrogel, showing no coincidence of the up curve with the down curve, indicating non-Newtonian thixotropic behavior.
Rheological behavior of the TH-loaded SLNs hydrogel.
| Viscosity(Cp) | RPM | Viscosity(Cp) | RPM |
|---|---|---|---|
| 52,000 | 10 | 13,570 | 100 |
| 40,460 | 20 | 18,500 | 60 |
| 32,800 | 30 | 21,000 | 50 |
| 23,890 | 50 | 29,800 | 30 |
| 20,320 | 60 | 36,400 | 20 |
| 13,570 | 100 | 48,500 | 10 |
Figure 6Sustained release of the drug from lyophilized SLNs (A) and the TH-loaded carbopol hydrogel over a period of 24 h (B).
Figure 7The in vitro antifungal activity of the TH-loaded SLNs carbopol hydrogel, showing significant effect on zone of inhibition compared to the marketed formulation in Candida albicans at different time intervals of 24 h on consecutive days for 3 days (A–C).
Colony-forming unit of Candida albicans on skin (dermal mycosis) of rats after treatment with the TH-loaded SLN-based hydrogel.
| Treatment | No. of Animals with Positive Culture/Total No. of Animals | Log CFU/Infected Sites |
|---|---|---|
| Control (Base formulation) | 7/7 | 5.69 ± 0.45 |
| TH solution in ethanol | 6/7 | 4.01 ± 0.33 |
| TH-loaded SLN-based hydrogel | 2/7 | 2.23 ± 0.19 *,# |
| Conventional marketed formulation of TH | 1/7 | 1.46 ± 0.15 ** |
* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 vs. control group; # p < 0.05 vs. group received TH solution in ethanol.
Stability of the terbinafine hydrochloride-loaded SLNs.
| Drug Content | Particle Size | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Room Temperature | Refrigerator Temperature | Room Temperature | |
| Initial | 100.0 | 100.0 | 241 nm |
| After 1 month | 99.7 ± 0.6 | 99.8 ± 0.2 | 248 nm |
| After 2 months | 99.4 ± 0.4 | 99.7 ± 0.5 | 250 nm |
| After 3 months | 99.1 ± 0.2 | 99.5 ± 0.6 | 269 nm |
Stability of the gel containing terbinafine hydrochloride-loaded SLNs.
| Drug content | pH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Room Temperature | Refrigerator Temperature | Room Temperature | |
| Initial | 100.0 | 100.0 | 6.5 |
| After 1 month | 99.7 ± 0.5 | 99.8 ± 0.1 | 6.6 ± 0.1 |
| After 2 months | 98.6 ± 0.7 | 98.9 ± 0.8 | 6.7 ± 0.0 |
| After 3 months | 97.1 ± 0.3 | 98.6 ± 0.4 | 6.4 ± 0.1 |