Literature DB >> 35889719

Special Issue "Advanced Nanomaterials for Bioimaging".

Gang Ho Lee1.   

Abstract

Bioimaging currently plays a critical role in medical diagnosis [...].

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35889719      PMCID: PMC9320963          DOI: 10.3390/nano12142496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)        ISSN: 2079-4991            Impact factor:   5.719


Bioimaging currently plays a critical role in medical diagnosis [1,2,3]. Various imaging modalities are available for this purpose, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X-ray computed tomography (CT), ultrasound imaging, fluorescence imaging (FI), positron emission tomography (PET), and single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT). Molecular imaging agents are a requisite for FI [4,5], PET [6], and SPECT [6], but they are also commonly used for MRI [7] and CT [8] in order to improve imaging sensitivity and resolution. Currently, most commercial imaging agents are molecular agents [6,7,8]. However, nanomaterials such as nanoparticles, nanorods, core-shell nanoparticles, and hybrid nanoparticles have been extensively investigated as imaging agents owing to their unique and advanced properties [9,10], which are highly advantageous for disease diagnosis and treatment [11,12]. This Special Issue focuses on various nanomaterials that are useful for imaging, drug delivery, and therapy. Nanoparticles possess several advantages over small molecules: they have advanced imaging properties, easy surface functionalization for tumor-targeted drug delivery, and longer blood circulation times. Nanoparticles also have higher metal ion concentrations than small molecules at the same number density, a property that makes them highly favorable CT contrast agents [13,14,15,16]. Gadolinium-containing nanoparticles exhibit higher longitudinal water proton spin relaxivities (r1) than Gd(III)-chelates do, and hence are useful high-performance T1 MRI contrast agents [10,11,13,14]. Fatima et al. reviewed recent advances in gadolinium-based contrast agents for bioimaging [17]. Gadolinium-based nanoparticles are useful as T1 MRI contrast agents because of the high and pure spin of Gd3+ (s = 7/2) and the high density of Gd3+ per nanoparticle; these lead to high r1 values, as well as r2/r1 ratios close to 1 (where r2 is the transverse water proton spin relaxivity). In addition, owing to the strong X-ray attenuation property of gadolinium, these nanoparticles are useful as CT contrast agents [13,14,15]. Dual T1 MRI-FI is also possible, by doping fluorescent europium or terbium metal ions into or conjugating dyes with gadolinium-based nanoparticles [17]. Holmium- and terbium-containing nanoparticles can be used as T2 MRI contrast agents owing to their appreciable magnetic moments at room temperature, a behavior that arises from the 4f-electron spin-orbital motions of these elements. Liu et al. prepared polyethylenimine (Mn = 1200 amu)-coated ultrasmall holmium oxide nanoparticles (average particle diameter: 2.05 nm) and measured their cytotoxicity and water proton spin relaxivities [18]. Notably, the nanoparticles exhibited an r2 value of 13.1 s−1 mM−1 with a negligible r1 value of 0.1 s−1 mM−1, which results in very large r2/r1 ratios and makes them efficient T2 MRI contrast agents. These nanoparticles exclusively induce T2 relaxations, with negligible induction of T1 relaxations, and can thus act as efficient T2 MRI contrast agents. Shanti et al. proved this phenomenon in vivo by successfully administering polyacrylic acid-coated terbium(III) and holmium(III) oxide nanoparticles to mice in 3.0 and 9.4 T MR fields [19]. They observed appreciable T2 contrasts in the livers and kidneys of the mice after injection, with enhanced T2 contrasts at 9.4 T. FI is a highly sensitive bioimaging modality that is useful for cell imaging and skin-deep in vivo imaging due to its low penetration depth (<1 cm) [2,3]. Compared with organic dyes and quantum dots [4,5], terbium- and europium-containing nanomaterials possess larger Stokes shifts and show less background noise in biological samples; thus, they are extremely useful for disease detection at very low concentrations. Gómez-Morales and coworkers synthesized luminescent citrate-functionalized terbium-substituted carbonated apatite nanomaterials and applied them to cellular uptake imaging [20]. The luminescence properties of these nanoparticles allowed visualization of their intracellular cytoplasmic uptake after 12 h of treatment through flow cytometry and fluorescence confocal microscopy (green fluorescence was observed) when incubated with A375 cells. Nanomaterials that combine imaging and therapy can be utilized in cancer theranostics. Such nanomaterials can be prepared by using nanoparticles with both imaging and therapeutic properties (such as gadolinium-containing nanomaterials [21]), or by synthesizing hybrid nanomaterials. Tian et al. prepared multifunctional magnetoplasmonic Au-MnO hybrid nanocomposites for cancer theranostics. MnO exhibited promising contrast enhancement in T1 MR imaging with good relaxivity (r1 = 1.2 mM−1 s−1), and Au produced sufficient heat (62 °C at 200 µg/mL) to ablate cancerous cells upon 808 nm laser irradiation (photothermal therapy), inducing cell toxicity and apoptosis [22]. Soft polymer nanomaterials are ideal drug delivery vehicles. They can also carry imaging materials to diagnose diseases. Zerrillo et al. synthesized poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) nanoparticles and grafted them with hyaluronic acid (HA), which can bind to specific receptors in various cells, in order to improve site specificity and drug dose delivery in osteoarthritis nanotherapy [23]. They further encapsulated the nanoparticles with a near-infrared (NIR) dye and gold (20 nm). With the NIR dye and gold acting as contrast agents, the encapsulated HA-PLGA nanoparticles were successfully visualized on micro-CT by optical imaging in vivo in mouse knees and ex vivo in human cartilage explants. This Special Issue covers a broad spectrum of nanomaterials that can be used for bioimaging. Surface modification of nanomaterials with hydrophilic ligands is essential for bioimaging applications, while further functionalization of surface-modified nanomaterials with drugs and cancer-targeting ligands will make them invaluable cancer-targeting theranostic agents.
  19 in total

Review 1.  Molecular imaging.

Authors:  R Weissleder; U Mahmood
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Metal-Based X-ray Contrast Media.

Authors:  S B Yu; A D Watson
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  1999-09-08       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 3.  Molecular imaging in living subjects: seeing fundamental biological processes in a new light.

Authors:  Tarik F Massoud; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 4.  Clinically Approved Nanoparticle Imaging Agents.

Authors:  Avnesh S Thakor; Jesse V Jokerst; Pejman Ghanouni; Jos L Campbell; Erik Mittra; Sanjiv S Gambhir
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  PLGA Nanoparticles Grafted with Hyaluronic Acid to Improve Site-Specificity and Drug Dose Delivery in Osteoarthritis Nanotherapy.

Authors:  Luana Zerrillo; Maria Rosa Gigliobianco; Domenico D'Atri; Joao Pedro Garcia; Fabio Baldazzi; Yanto Ridwan; Gastón Fuentes; Alan Chan; Laura B Creemers; Roberta Censi; Piera Di Martino; Luis J Cruz
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30       Impact factor: 5.719

6.  Polyethylenimine-Coated Ultrasmall Holmium Oxide Nanoparticles: Synthesis, Characterization, Cytotoxicities, and Water Proton Spin Relaxivities.

Authors:  Shuwen Liu; Huan Yue; Son Long Ho; Soyeon Kim; Ji Ae Park; Tirusew Tegafaw; Mohammad Yaseen Ahmad; Seungho Kim; Abdullah Khamis Ali Al Saidi; Dejun Zhao; Ying Liu; Sung-Wook Nam; Kwon Seok Chae; Yongmin Chang; Gang Ho Lee
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 5.719

7.  Paramagnetic nanoparticle T1 and T2 MRI contrast agents.

Authors:  Wenlong Xu; Krishna Kattel; Ja Young Park; Yongmin Chang; Tae Jeong Kim; Gang Ho Lee
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.676

8.  Gold nanoparticles: a new X-ray contrast agent.

Authors:  J F Hainfeld; D N Slatkin; T M Focella; H M Smilowitz
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.039

9.  Synthesis, Characterizations, and 9.4 Tesla T2 MR Images of Polyacrylic Acid-Coated Terbium(III) and Holmium(III) Oxide Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Shanti Marasini; Huan Yue; Son Long Ho; Ji Ae Park; Soyeon Kim; Ki-Hye Jung; Hyunsil Cha; Shuwen Liu; Tirusew Tegafaw; Mohammad Yaseen Ahmad; Adibehalsadat Ghazanfari; Kwon-Seok Chae; Yongmin Chang; Gang Ho Lee
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 5.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.