| Literature DB >> 35889647 |
Qian Zhang1,2,3, Wuyang Nie1,2,3, Tian Hou1,2,3, Hao Shen4, Qiang Li1,2,3, Chongshang Guan1,2,3, Libing Duan1,2,3, Xiaoru Zhao1,2,3.
Abstract
Crystal facet engineering and nonmetal doping are regarded as effective strategies for improving the separation of charge carriers and photocatalytic activity of semiconductor photocatalysts. In this paper, we developed a facial method for fabricating oxygen-deficient Br-doped BiOCl nanosheets with dominating {001} facets through a traditional hydrothermal reaction and explored the impact of the Br doping and specific facets on carrier separation and photocatalytic performance. The morphologies, structures, and optical and photocatalytic properties of the obtained products were characterized systematically. The BiOCl samples prepared by the hydrothermal reaction exhibited square-like shapes with dominating {001} facets. Photodeposition results indicated that photoinduced electrons preferred to transfer to {001} facets because of the strong internal static electric fields in BiOCl nanosheets with dominating {001} facets. Br doping not only contributed to the formation of impurity energy levels that could promote light absorption but introduced a large number of surface oxygen vacancies (VO) in BiOCl photocatalysts, which was beneficial for photocatalytic performance. Moreover, the photocatalytic activities of these products under visible light were tested by degradation of rhodamine B (RhB). Because of the synergistic effect of the dominating {001} facets, Br doping, and rich VO, oxygen-deficient Br-doped BiOCl nanosheets exhibited improved carrier separation, visible light absorption, and photocatalytic efficiency.Entities:
Keywords: BiOCl nanosheets; Br doping; oxygen vacancies; photocatalytic performance; surface facet
Year: 2022 PMID: 35889647 PMCID: PMC9318533 DOI: 10.3390/nano12142423
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1XRD pattern of the as-prepared samples.
Figure 2SEM patterns of BOC, Br−BOC−0.5, Br−BOC−1, and Br−BOC−2.
Figure 3EDS analyses of Br−BOC−1.
Summary of Eg and BET data for all samples.
| BOC | Br−BOC−0.5 | Br−BOC−1 | Br−BOC−2 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eg (eV) | 3.21 | 3.06 | 3.02 | 2.96 |
| SBET (m2g−1) | 11.18 | 12.45 | 12.85 | 12.67 |
Figure 4(a) TEM image of Br−BOC−1, (b) HRTEM image taken from the top view of Br−BOC−1, (c) HRTEM image taken from the side view of Br−BOC−1, (d) SAED pattern taken from the top view of Br−BOC−1.
Figure 5(a) XPS survey spectra and (b) Br 3d high-resolution XPS spectra of as-prepared samples.
Figure 6O 1s XPS spectra of (a) BOC, (b) Br−BOC−0.5, (c) Br−BOC−1, and (d) Br−BOC−2; (e) the integral area ratios of the XPS peak for O 1s, (f) ESR spectra of BOC and Br−BOC−1.
Figure 7(a) UV–vis diffuse reflectance spectra of BOC, Br−BOC−0.5, Br−BOC−1, and Br−BOC−2 nanosheets; (b) the plot of transformed Kubelka-Munk function versus the energy of light.
Figure 8PL spectra of as-prepared BOC, Br−BOC−0.5, Br−BOC−1, and Br−BOC−2 nanosheets.
Figure 9(a) Photocatalytic degradation of RhB by BOC, Br−BOC−0.5, Br−BOC−1, and Br−BOC−2; (b) the corresponding kinetic curves; (c) photocatalytic degradation of tetracycline hydrochloride by Br−BOC−1; (d) active species trapping experiments for Br−BOC−1 with different scavengers under visible light.
Figure 10Photocatalytic degradation of MO by BOC and Br−BOC−1.
Figure 11TEM images of BOC (a) and Br−BOC−1 (b) with Pt photodeposited under UV light irradiation.
Scheme 1Band structure of the Br−doped BOC and schematic of the separation and transfer of charge charges in Br−doped BOC nanosheets.