| Literature DB >> 35889644 |
Rong Hu1, Huiyu Jiang1, Jinglin Xian1, Shiyun Mi1, Liyun Wei1, Guangyu Fang1, Jiayue Guo1, Siqi Xu1, Ziyang Liu1, Huanyu Jin2, Huimin Yu3, Jun Wan1.
Abstract
Layered double hydroxide (LDH) is widely used in electrocatalytic water splitting due to its good structural tunability, high intrinsic activity, and mild synthesis conditions, especially for flexible fiber-based catalysts. However, the poor stability of the interface between LDH and flexible carbon textile prepared by hydrothermal and electrodeposition methods greatly affects its active area and cyclic stability during deformation. Here, we report a salt-template-assisted method for the growth of two-dimensional (2D) amorphous ternary LDH based on dip-rolling technology. The robust and high-dimensional structure constructed by salt-template and fiber could achieve a carbon textile-based water splitting catalyst with high loading, strong catalytic activity, and good stability. The prepared 2D NiFeCo-LDH/CF electrode showed overpotentials of 220 mV and 151 mV in oxygen evolution and hydrogen evolution reactions, respectively, and simultaneously had no significant performance decrease after 100 consecutive bendings. This work provides a new strategy for efficiently designing robust, high-performance LDH on flexible fibers, which may have great potential in commercial applications.Entities:
Keywords: Pearson’s principle; amorphous; electrocatalytic water splitting; layered hydroxide; ternary
Year: 2022 PMID: 35889644 PMCID: PMC9316908 DOI: 10.3390/nano12142416
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1Two-dimensional (2D) amorphous M(OH)2 growth mechanism based on Pearson’s HSAB Principle.
Figure 2Preparation and morphology characterization of NiFeCo-LDH. (a) The general preparation process of NiFeCo-LDH. (b–d) SEM images of Cu2O, Cu2O@NiFeCo-LDH/CF, and NiFeCo-LDH/CF. (e) Partial enlargement of NiFeCo-LDH/CF. (f) The element distribution of NiFeCo-LDH/CF.
Figure 3(a) XRD spectra of Cu2O and NiFeCo-LDH/CF. XPS spectra of NiFeCo-LDH/CF (b) survey, (c) Ni 2p, (d) Fe 2p, and (e) Co 2p. (f) FT-IR spectra of NiFeCo-LDH/CF.
Figure 4(a) Schematic diagram of electrocatalytic water splitting. (b) Oxygen evolution reaction (OER) performance of commercial RuO2, bare CF, and NiFeCo-LDH/CF in 1.0 M KOH. The contact angles of bare CF and NiFeCo-LDH/CF are illustrated. (c) Corresponding Tafel plots. (d,e) The LSV curves and Tafel slope of Pt/C bare CF and NiFeCo-LDH/CF. (f) Comparison of HER performance in common LDH. (g) Cyclic voltammograms of NiFeCo-LDH/CF. (h) Estimation of Cdl by plotting the current density variation against scan rate to fit a linear regression. (i) Nyquist plots of the above electrocatalysts.
Figure 5The mechanical flexibility of NiFeCo-LDH/CF. (a) I–t curve of the NiFeCo-LDH/CF bent with various curvatures under a constant voltage of 1 V. (b) Oxygen evolution reaction (OER) performance of NiFeCo-LDH/CF with various bending states, and (c) corresponding long-term stability testing. (d,e) Hydrogen evolution reaction performance of NiFeCo-LDH/CF. The long-term stability testing of NiFeCo-LDH/CF after bending 100 times, (f) OER, and (g) HER (the inset shows a magnified view of local current density). (h) The morphology and structure of the NiFeCo-LDH/CF after the long-term stability testing.