| Literature DB >> 35889556 |
Heedae Kim1, Jong Su Kim2, Jin Dong Song3.
Abstract
Micro-photoluminescence was observed while increasing the excitation power in a single GaAs quantum ring (QR) at 4 K. Fine structures at the energy levels of the ground (N = 1) and excited (N = 2) state excitons exhibited a blue shift when excitation power increased. The excited state exciton had a strong polarization dependence that stemmed from the asymmetric localized state. According to temperature-dependence measurements, strong exciton-phonon interaction (48 meV) was observed from an excited exciton state in comparison with the weak exciton-phonon interaction (27 meV) from the ground exciton state, resulting from enhanced confinement in the excited exciton state. In addition, higher activation energy (by 20 meV) was observed for the confined electrons in a single GaAs QR, where the confinement effect was enhanced by the asymmetric ring structure.Entities:
Keywords: exciton; fine structures; localized states; photoluminescence; polarization dependence; quantum dot structure; quantum ring structure; strong confinement
Year: 2022 PMID: 35889556 PMCID: PMC9323788 DOI: 10.3390/nano12142331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nanomaterials (Basel) ISSN: 2079-4991 Impact factor: 5.719
Figure 1(a) Single QD/QR structure observed via SEM. (b) Excited X (N = 2) and XX (biexciton) states appear from a single GaAs QR with increasing excitation power. The ground- and excited-state exciton (X) is blue-shifted because of the sequential filling of fine-structure states. Only ground exciton states are observed from a single QD with no peak shifts. (c) PL spectra of X (N = 2) at different analyzer angles, exhibiting strong polarization dependence between the analyzer angles of 0° and 90° with energy splittings (Δ).
Figure 2(a) Bandgap shift and linewidth broadening for the temperature change with fitting via the Bose–Einstein model and the exciton–phonon interaction formula at X (N = 1) and X (N = 2). (b) Integrated area ratio of the X (N = 1) PL peak to the X (N = 2) PL peak as a function of the temperature.
Figure 3Integrated PL intensities with respect to the temperature for the (a) QR and (b) QD.
Figure 4Time-resolved PL spectra at 4 K for comparing the carrier dynamics of the QR and QD. The PL decay curves for the two structures exhibit different decay behaviors.