| Literature DB >> 35889498 |
Li-Yun Lin1, Yi-Lun Liao2, Min-Hung Chen3, Shih-Feng Chang1, Kuan-Chou Chen4,5, Robert Y Peng4,6.
Abstract
Coix lacryma-jobi var. ma-yuen L. Gramineae is widely cultivated in Taiwan. Literature regarding the molecular action mechanism of coixol on tyrosinase and the application of coicis seed extracts to the processing of facial masks is still lacking. Solvent extractability analysis revealed that most of the polyphenolics in coicis seeds were water soluble (3.17 ± 0.12 to 3.63 ± 0.07 μg/mLGAE). In contrast, the methanolic extract contained the most flavonoids (0.06 ± 0.00~0.26 ± 0.03 μg/mL QE) and coixol (11.43 ± 0.13~12.83 ± 0.14 μg/mL), showing potent antioxidant capability. Additionally, the contents of coixenolide (176.77 ± 5.91 to 238.60 ± 0.21 μg/g), phytosterol (52.45 ± 2.05 to 58.23 ± 1.14 mg/g), and polysaccharides (3.42 ± 0.10 to 4.41 ± 0.10 mg/g) were rather high. The aqueous extract (10 μg/mL) and the ethanolic extract (1 mg/mL) showed no cytotoxicity to B16F10 melanocytes. More attractively, the ethanolic extract at 1 mg/mL caused 48.4% inhibition of tyrosinase activity in B16F10 melanocytes, and 50.7% on human tyrosinase (hTyr) fragment 369-377. Conclusively, the coicis seed extracts containing abundant nutraceuticals with promising anti-hTyr activity and moisturizing capability can serve as good ingredients for facial mask processing.Entities:
Keywords: anti-tyrosinase; antioxidant; coix; facial masks; polyphenolics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35889498 PMCID: PMC9325028 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27144626
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Comparison of the solvent extractability from the coix seeds *.
| Solvent | Extraction Yield, % | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cultivar | Water | EtOH | MeOH | Ethyl Acetate | |
| No. 1 | A 4.55 ± 0.14 a | B 1.75 ± 0.04 c | D 1.11 ± 0.03 d | C 2.69 ± 0.12 b b | |
| No. 2 | C 3.80 ± 0.09 a | C 1.61 ± 0.05 cd | B 1.73 ± 0.13 c | A 3.21 ± 0.06 b | |
| No. 3 | B 4.19 ± 0.13 a | C 1.65 ± 0.02 d | A 2.01 ± 0.04 c | C 2.65 ± 0.07 b | |
| No. 4 | B 4.26 ± 0.12 a | B 1.89 ± 0.01 c | C 1.34 ± 0.15 d | B 3.02 ± 0.03 b | |
| No. 5 | B 4.13 ± 0.11 a | A 2.05 ± 0.06 c | DE 1.07 ± 0.04 d | AB 3.13 ± 0.01 b | |
* Data are expressed as mean ± SD from triplicate experiments (n = 3). The superscript in upper case indicates significantly different in the same column. The superscript in lower case indicates significantly different in the same row (p < 0.05).
The solvent extractability for total polyphenolics and total flavonoids from the coix seeds *.
| Extraction | Total Polyphenolics (Gallic Acid eq., μg/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cultivar | Water | EtOH | MeOH | Ethyl Acetate |
| No.1 | CD 3.17 ± 0.12 a | E 0.60 ± 0.02 c | B 1.10 ± 0.03 b | C 0.38 ± 0.00 d |
| No.2 | AB 3.58 ± 0.11 a | C 1.01 ± 0.05 b | D 0.68 ± 0.05 c | B 0.51 ± 0.03 d |
| No. 3 | C 3.27 ± 0.03 a | A 1.36 ± 0.10 b | D 0.73 ± 0.09 c | D 0.28 ± 0.01 d |
| No. 4 | B 3.44 ± 0.20 a | D 0.91 ± 0.01 c | A 1.48 ± 0.10 b | A 0.62 ± 0.05 d |
| No. 5 | A 3.63 ± 0.07 a | B 1.18 ± 0.02 b | C 0.98 ± 0.07 bc | C 0.37 ± 0.00 d |
| Total flavonoids (Quercetin eq., μg/mL) | ||||
| No. 1 | CD 0.01 ± 0.00 c | BC 0.05 ± 0.01 b | A 0.26 ± 0.03 a | A 0.05 ± 0.00 b |
| No. 2 | CD 0.01 ± 0.00 d | A 0.11 ± 0.00 a | C 0.09 ± 0.01 ab | A 0.05 ± 0.01 c |
| No. 3 | B 0.04 ± 0.00 b | BC 0.05 ± 0.00 ab | D 0.06 ± 0.00 a | A 0.06 ± 0.02 a |
| No. 4 | C 0.02 ± 0.00 c | B 0.06 ± 0.01 b | B 0.17 ± 0.02 a | BC 0.02 ± 0.00 c |
| No. 5 | A 0.06 ± 0.00 b | BC 0.05 ± 0.01 bc | A 0.20 ± 0.03 a | B 0.03 ± 0.00 d |
* Data are expressed as mean ± SD from triplicate experiments (n = 3). The superscripts in upper case indicate significantly different in the same column. The superscripts in lower case indicate significantly different in the same row (p < 0.05).
The free radical scavenging capability for DPPH and ABTS+ by different extracts of the coix seeds *.
| Extraction | DPPH (Trolox µg/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cultivar | Water | EtOH | MeOH | Ethyl Acetate |
| No. 1 | A 1.96 ± 0.02 c | AB 3.55 ± 0.01 b | AB 8.29 ± 0.10 a | A 1.05 ± 0.03 d |
| No. 2 | D 1.57 ± 0.02 c | C 3.25 ± 0.03 b | A 8.52 ± 0.06 a | A 1.16 ± 0.04 d |
| No. 3 | A 1.93 ± 0.04 c | A 3.64 ± 0.07 b | C 7.90 ± 0.00 a | B 0.93 ± 0.01 d |
| No. 4 | BC 1.78 ± 0.01 c | A 3.67 ± 0.01 b | B 8.04 ± 0.00 a | C 0.45 ± 0.00 d |
| No 5 | B 1.84 ± 0.03 c | D 3.19 ± 0.00 b | D 7.67 ± 0.03 a | D 0.36 ± 0.03 d |
|
| ||||
| No. 1 | B 2.50 ± 0.01 c | C 2.74 ± 0.02 b | E 6.45 ± 0.11 a | A 2.16 ± 0.04 d |
| No. 2 | A 2.62 ± 0.06 b | D 2.42 ± 0.06 c | B 8.04 ± 0.08 a | CD 1.77 ± 0.14 d |
| No. 3 | AB 2.56 ± 0.00 c | B 3.16 ± 0.04 b | A 8.79 ± 0.12 a | C 1.87 ± 0.09 d |
| No. 4 | C 2.20 ± 0.02 c | A 3.50 ± 0.00 b | C 7.46 ± 0.01 a | AB 2.09 ± 0.01 cd |
| No. 5 | D 2.03 ± 0.02 c | A 3.49 ± 0.00 b | D 6.86 ± 0.06 a | E 1.60 ± 0.03 d |
* Data are expressed as mean ± SD from triplicate experiments (n = 3). The superscripts in upper case indicate significantly different in the same column. The superscripts in lower case indicate significantly different in the same row (p < 0.05).
The phytosterol and polysaccharide contents of the coix seeds *.
| Cultivar | Phytosterol (mg/g) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Campesterol | γ−Σιτοστερολ | Total | |
| No. 1 | B 1.71 ± 0.20 | B 52.20 ± 2.03 | C 53.91 ± 1.95 |
| No. 2 | B 1.79 ± 1.00 | B 51.63 ± 3.63 | B 53.42 ± 3.00 |
| No. 3 | AB 1.82 ± 0.10 | BC 50.63 ± 2.63 | C 52.45 ± 2.05 |
| No. 4 | A 1.95 ± 0.22 | A 59.92 ± 3.65 | A 61.87 ± 4.17 |
| No. 5 | A 1.91 ± 0.14 | A 56.32 ± 1.20 | AB 58.23 ± 1.14 |
|
| |||
| No. 1 | A 4.14 ± 0.10 | ||
| No. 2 | D 3.42 ± 0.10 | ||
| No. 3 | B 3.63 ± 0.14 | ||
| No. 4 | B 3.69 ± 0.20 | ||
| No. 5 | C 3.59 ± 0.02 | ||
* Data are expressed as mean ± SD from triplicate experiments (n = 3). The superscripts in upper case indicate significantly different in the same column (p < 0.05).
Solvent extractability for coixol and the recovery of coixenolide from coix seeds *.
| Cultivar | Recovery of Coixol (μg/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Water | EtOH | MeOH | Ethyl Acetate | |
| No. 1 | B 9.97 ± 0.10 b | A 5.59 ± 0.01 c | A 12.83 ± 0.14 a | A 1.24 ± 0.00 d |
| No. 2 | CD 9.28 ± 0.20 b | C 5.19 ± 0.00 c | C 11.43 ± 0.13 a | C 1.04 ± 0.03 d |
| No. 3 | C 9.69 ± 0.03 b | C 5.11 ± 0.01 c | AB 11.92 ± 0.10 a | A 1.23 ± 0.04 d |
| No. 4 | A 10.50 ± 0.12 b | B 5.43 ± 0.01 c | A 12.01 ± 0.15 a | AB 1.19 ± 0.12 d |
| No. 5 | A 10.40 ± 0.02 b | A 5.53 ± 0.03 c | A 12.18 ± 0.11 a | A 1.29 ± 0.02 d |
|
| ||||
| No. 1 | CD 176.77 ± 5.91 | |||
| No. 2 | C 184.16 ± 4.30 | |||
| No. 3 | B 203.26 ± 4.21 | |||
| No. 4 | A 234.19 ± 4.42 | |||
| No. 5 | A 238.60 ± 0.21 | |||
* Data are expressed as mean ± SD from triplicate experiments (n = 3). The superscripts in upper case indicate significantly different in the same column. The superscripts in lower case indicate significantly different in the same row (p < 0.05).
Figure 1The viability test on B16F10 melanocytes affected by the different coicis extracts. (a) Aqueous extracts. (b) Ethanolic extracts. The superscripts in lower case (a, b and c) in the figure indicate significant difference between the columns (p < 0.05).
The anti-tyrosinase activity in B16-F10 melanocytes and hTyrosinase fragment 369–377 affected by different treatments.
| Sample | Dose | Tyrosinase Activity *, % | Activity of hTyr **, % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Control | - | 100.0 ± 0.0 | 100.0 ± 0.0 |
| α-MSH, μg/mL | 1.67 | 117.8 ± 1.0 | - |
| Kojic acid, mg/mL | 0.28 | 54.4 ± 0.1 | 88.7 ± 1.5 |
| Coixol, μg/mL | 5 | 49.4 ± 0.6 | 35.7 ± 0.4 |
| 10 | 38.5 ± 0.2 | 24.2 ± 0.6 | |
| 15 | 29.4 ± 0.6 | 13.8 ± 0.5 | |
| Aqueous extract, mg/mL | 0.01 | 104.3 ± 0.2 | 100.5 ± 0.4 |
| 0.50 | 101.6 ± 3.0 | 101.8 ± 2.4 | |
| 1.00 | 88.1 ± 1.6 | 91.0 ± 1.5 | |
| Ethanolic extract, mg/mL | 1.0 | 51.6 ± 0.3 | 49.3 ± 0.8 |
| 20.0 | 46.1 ± 0.9 | 43.5 ± 0.6 | |
| 50.0 | 34.3 ± 0.7 | 32.4 ± 0.4 |
* The activity of intracellular tyrosinase was normalized to the cell numbers. ** hTyr: human tyrosinase fragment 369–377.
The test on the water holding capability of facial masks.
| Sample Masks a | Water Holding Capability, % | % Enhanced | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before Treatment | After Treatment | ||
| Ref 1 | 38.9 | 43.6 | 4.7 |
| Ref 2 | 42.2 | 53.8 | 11.6 |
| CSE 1 | 37.4 | 48.8 | 11.4 |
| CSE 2 | 39.4 | 49.6 | 10.2 |
a Ref 1 (applied on the left arm) and Ref 2 (applied on the right arm): reference masks purchased from commercial brands. CSE: coix seed extract facial masks. CSE 1 (applied on the left arm); CSE 2 (applied on the right arm).
Figure 2Mechanism of action of different coix constituents on epidermis to exert whitening and water holding bioactivity. Coixol inhibited tyrosinase to prevent the transformation of tyrosine to L-DOPA and then to DOPAquinone, which is converted to melanin via oxidative polymerization. The polyphenolics and flavonoids inhibited the bioactivity of peroxidase, involved in the melanin formation, while the phytosterols and polysaccharides exerted the water holding bioactivity on the epidermis. Involvement of peroxidase suggested by Mastore et al. [44].