| Literature DB >> 35889403 |
Yukun Jiao1, Yiting Yang1, Lishuang Zhou1, Daofeng Chen1, Yan Lu1.
Abstract
Two novel natural flavonoid substituted polysaccharides (MBAP-1 and MBAP-2) were obtained from Tamarix chinensis Lour. and characterized by HPGPC, methylation, ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-ion trap tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-IT-MSn), and NMR analysis. The results showed that MBAP-1 was a homogenous heteropolysaccharide with a backbone of 4)-β-d-Glcp-(1→ and →3,4,6)-β-d-Glcp-(1→. MBAP-2 was also a homogenous polysaccharide which possessed a backbone of →3)-α-d-Glcp-(1→, →4)-β-d-Glcp-(1→ and →3,4)-β-d-Glcp-2-OMe-(1→. Both the two polysaccharides were substituted by quercetin and exhibited anticomplement activities in vitro. However, MBAP-1 (CH50: 0.075 ± 0.004 mg/mL) was more potent than MBAP-2 (CH50: 0.249 ± 0.006 mg/mL) and its reduced product, MBAP-1R (CH50: 0.207 ± 0.008 mg/mL), indicating that multiple monosaccharides and uronic acids might contribute to the anticomplement activity of the flavonoid substituted polysaccharides of T. chinensis. Furthermore, the antioxidant activity of MBAP-1 was also more potent than that of MBAP-2. In conclusion, these two flavonoid substituted polysaccharides from T. chinensis were found to be potential oxidant and complement inhibitors.Entities:
Keywords: Tamarix chinensis Lour.; anticomplement activity; flavonoid substituted polysaccharides; quercetin; structural characterization
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35889403 PMCID: PMC9315555 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27144532
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.927
Figure 1The eluted profiles and HPSEC-MALLS-RI results. (A) The eluted profile of MBAP90 on DEAE-52 column and Fr. 2 on Sepharyl S-200 column. (B) Superimposed spectra detected using RI and LC at angle of 90° on HPSEC-MALLS-RI. (C) Molar mass distribution detected by HPSEC-MALLS-RI.
The molecular parameters of MBAP-1 and MBAP-2 determined by SEC-MALLS-RI.
| Molecular Characteristics | Parameter | Detection Results | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MBAP-1 | MBAP-2 | ||
| Polydispersity | Mw/Mn | 1.01 | 1.07 |
| Mz/Mn | 1.04 | 1.05 | |
| Molar mass moments (g/mol) | Mw | 2.693 × 105 | 4.650 × 104 |
| Mn | 2.537 × 105 | 4.611 × 104 | |
| Mz | 2.501 × 105 | 4.520 × 104 | |
| Mp | 2.51 × 105 | 3.91 × 104 | |
| Rms radius moments (nm) | Rz | 1.5 nm | 1.5 nm |
Figure 2The chromatograms of monosaccharide composition (A), monosaccharide absolute configuration analysis (B) and UPLC-MS identification results of substituted flavonoids (C,D) of MBAP-1 and MBAP-2.
The primary chemical characteristics of MBAP-1 and MBAP-2.
| Sample | Yield (%) | Total Sugar Content (%) | Uronic Acid (%) | Protein (%) | Flavonoids (%) | Monosaccharide Composition ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glc | GlcA | GalA | Gal | Ara | ||||||
| MBAP-1 | 0.14 | 86.06 ± 2.76 | 9.64 ± 0.56 | 1.90 ± 0.15 | 12.03 ± 1.20 | 65.17 (54.54 #) | 6.27 (4.87 #) | 5.42 (4.21 #) | 5.03 (4.21 #) | 18.10 (18.18 #) |
| MBAP-2 | 0.16 | 82.03 ± 1.77 | - | 2.06 ± 0.13 | 15.96 ± 1.36 | 88.18 (88.41 #) | - | - | - | - |
# The molar ratio of each monosaccharide.
The PMAAs results of MBAP-1, MBAP-1R and MBAP-2.
| PMAAs | Linkages | Molar Ratio | Major Mass Fragments ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MBAP-1 | MBAP-1R | MBAP-2 | |||
| 1,3,4,5,6-Penta- | 1,3,4,6-linked-Glc | 1.00 | 1.00 | 43, 59, 87, 118, 139, 333 | |
| 1,2,3,5-Tetra- | 1,2,3-linked-Glc | 1.03 | 0.95 | 43, 59, 71, 87, 101, 129, 161, 202, 262 | |
| 1,4,5-Tri- | 1,5-linked-Ara | 1.87 | 1.95 | 43, 59, 87, 102, 118, 129, 189 | |
| 1,4-Di- | 1-linked-Ara | 2.21 | 2.24 | 43, 59, 71, 87, 102, 118, 129, 161, 162 | |
| 1,5-Di- | 1-linked-Gal | n.d. | 1.12 | 43, 71, 87, 102, 118, 129, 145, 161, 162, 205 | |
| 1,3,4,5-Tetra- | 1,3,4-linked-Glc | 1.98 | 2.01 | 0.89 | 43, 59, 87, 118, 129, 160, 185, 305 |
| 1,4,5-Tri- | 1,4-linked-Gal | 1.03 | 0.99 | 43, 59, 71, 87, 102, 118, 129, 162, 233 | |
| 1,4,5-Tri- | 1,4-linked-Glc | 8.01 | 7.89 | 0.35 | 43, 59, 71, 87, 102, 118, 129, 162, 233 |
| 1,5-Di- | 1-linked-Glc | n.d. | 1.10 | 1.20 | 43, 71, 87, 102, 118, 129, 145, 161, 162, 205 |
| 1,3,5,6-Tetra- | 1,3,6-linked-Glc | 0.38 | 43, 59, 87, 118, 129, 139, 160, 189, 234, 305 | ||
| 1,5,6-Tri- | 1,6-linked-Glc | 1.01 | 43, 59, 87, 99, 101, 118, 129, 162, 189, 233 | ||
Note: n.d. means not detected in GC-MS.
Figure 3HSQC (A) spectrum and HMBC (B) spectrum of MBAP-1.
Figure 4HSQC (A) spectrum and HMBC (B) spectrum of MBAP-2.
1H-NMR (600 MHz) and 13C-NMR (150 MHz) chemical shifts of MBAP-1 and MBAP-2.
| Name | Code | Residues | Chemical Shifts (ppm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| H1/C1 | H2/C2 | H3/C3 | H4/C4 | H5/C5 | H6/C6 | |||
| MBAP-1 | A | →3,4,6)-α- | 5.26/101.76 | 3.36/72.47 | 4.01/86.21 | 3.50/77.49 | 3.98/71.22 | 3.85/69.46 |
| B | →2,3)-α- | 5.21/94.86 | 4.33/84.89 | 4.00/80.62 | 3.88/72.97 | 3.92/73.13 | 3.61/61.54 | |
| C | →5)-α- | 5.13/109.84 | 4.11/79.08 | 3.99/79.21 | 4.11/83.30 | 3.78/68.53 | ||
| D | α- | 5.07/110.23 | 4.12/84.16 | 3.88/76.51 | 4.06/86.96 | 3.72/63.41 | ||
| E | β- | 4.95/100.47 | 3.77/69.59 | 3.47/72.12 | 3.53/73.99 | 3.73/68.31 | -/175.87 | |
| F | →3,4)-β- | 4.73/102.72 | 3.65/76.30 | 4.06/86.66 | 3.77/76.40 | 3.69/78.60 | 3.92/63.41 | |
| G | →4)-β- | 4.70/98.66 | 3.79/74.14 | 3.97/75.00 | 3.65/76.18 | 4.32/78.82 | 3.80/59.78 | |
| H | →4)-β- | 4.62/98.70 | 3.30/72.40 | 3.55/74.20 | 3.92/78.55 | 3.63/71.68 | 3.73/58.92 | |
| I | β- | 4.48/105.32 | 3.50/72.33 | 3.60/76.54 | 3.62/75.58 | 3.59/77.17 | -/178.66 | |
| MBAP-2 | A | →3,6)-α- | 5.32/98.91 | 4.40/80.62 | 4.31/81.47 | 3.76/70.88 | 3.84/73.76 | 3.71/69.56 |
| B | →6)-α- | 5.23/98.68 | 4.25/79.52 | 3.93/73.76 | 3.88/70.28 | 3.90/74.01 | 3.62/68.56 | |
| C | →3,4)-α- | 5.08/100.60 | 3.67/75.51 | 4.39/82.41 | 3.76/74.51 | 3.78/74.77 | 3.53/60.32 | |
| D | →4)-β- | 4.92/100.26 | 3.62/70.51 | 3.48/72.21 | 3.64/74.82 | 3.35/72.40 | 3.74/60.23 | |
| E | β- | 4.37/102.53 | 3.75/73.10 | 3.56/73.52 | 3.40/70.22 | 3.46/75.83 | 3.68/60.48 | |
Note: The 1H and 13C chemical shifts of -OMe group were 3.71 and 55.20 ppm.
Figure 5The putative structures of the repeating units of MBAP-1 and MBAP-2. The residues were labeled as A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H and I.
Figure 6SEM results of MBAP-1 and MBAP-2 at different magnifications ((A): 1000×, (B): 3000×).
Figure 7Anticomplement activities of MBAP-1, MBAP-2, MBAP-1R and quercetin.
Figure 8Antioxidant activities of MBAP-1 and MBAP-2. (A) The FRAP results of MBAP-1 and MBAP-2. (B) The ABTS results of MBAP-1 and MBAP-2.