| Literature DB >> 35888824 |
Zhiming Li1,2,3, Zhonghao Li1,2,3, Zhenrong Shi1,2,3, Hao Zhang1,2,3, Yanling Liang1,2,3, Jun Tang1,2,3.
Abstract
Radiation with high-efficiency, large-bandwidth, and uniform magnetic field radiation antennas in a large field of view are the key to achieving high-precision wide-field imaging. This paper presents a hollow Ω-type antenna design for diamond nitrogen-vacancy (NV) ensemble color center imaging. The uniformity of the antenna reaches 94% in a 4.4 × 4.4 mm2 area. Compared with a straight copper antenna, the radiation efficiency of the proposed antenna is 71.8% higher, and the bandwidth is improved by 11.82 times, demonstrating the effectiveness of the hollow Ω-type antenna.Entities:
Keywords: ensemble NV color centers; high-bandwidth; radiation antenna; uniformity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35888824 PMCID: PMC9319680 DOI: 10.3390/mi13071007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 3.523
Figure 1(a) Experimental system; (b) Schematic diagram of antenna model; (c) Relationship between r1 and simulated resonant frequency; (d) Straight copper antenna schematic diagram and measurement position (L3 = 59 mm, L4 = 44 mm, h3 = 2 mm, the thickness is 1.524 mm).
Antenna parameters (unit: mm).
| Parameters | r1 | r2 | r3 | W | h1 | L1 | h2 | L2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Value(mm) | 4.68 | 9.24 | 3.22 | 6.62 | 3.22 | 18 | 5 | 4.3 |
Figure 2(a) Schematic diagram of the hollow area; (b) The simulated magnetic field strength in the range of [−2.4 mm, 2.4 mm] of the x-axis and y-axis, respectively.
Figure 3(a) ODMR signal with different microwave power; (b) Relationship between FWHM and microwave power at pixel 1; (c) Relationship between contrast and microwave power at pixel 1.
Figure 4(a) ODMR of hollow Ω-type antenna; (b) ODMR of the straight copper antenna; (c) Contrast value of two antennas under different power; (d) Comparison of FWHM value of two antennas under different power.
The constants and fitting parameters in Equations (1) and (2).
| Constant | Value | Fitting Parameter | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| ~1 ms |
| 50 (8) |
|
| ~1 μs |
|
|
|
| ~0.1 μs |
| 1.6 (2) |
|
|
| ||
|
| 0.0284 (6) | ||
|
| 198 (27) mW |
Statistical analysis of FWHM, contrast, and simulated magnetic field intensity B at different points in Figure 2a.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FWHM | 12.026 | 13.206 | 12.656 | 12.424 | 13.988 | 12.098 |
| contrast | 0.0248 | 0.0228 | 0.0232 | 0.0248 | 0.0254 | 0.0258 |
| B (Gs) | 0.0542 | 0.0536 | 0.0556 | 0.056 | 0.061 | 0.0598 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FWHM | 13.689 | 13.658 | 12.658 | 12.9337 | 0.726 | 5.61 |
| contrast | 0.0266 | 0.0226 | 0.0246 | 0.0245 | 0.0014 | 5.71 |
| B (Gs) | 0.0623 | 0.0595 | 0.0565 | 0.0576 | 0.0031 | 5.38 |
Figure 5(a) Measured and simulated values of S11; (b) S11 measured values of two antennas.