| Literature DB >> 35887715 |
Wei Zhu1, Zhanqi Wei1,2, Tianjun Zhou1, Chang Han1, Zehui Lv1, Han Wang1, Bin Feng1, Xisheng Weng1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA), which is performed mostly in elderly individuals, can result in substantial blood loss and thereby imposes a significant physical burden and risk of blood transfusion. The femoral neck cut and reamed acetabulum are the main sites of intraoperative bleeding. Whether the bone density in that region can be used to predict the amount of blood loss in THA is unknown.Entities:
Keywords: blood loss; bone density; predictor; total hip arthroplasty
Year: 2022 PMID: 35887715 PMCID: PMC9325145 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11143951
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Med ISSN: 2077-0383 Impact factor: 4.964
Figure 1Study flow of this research. BMD is bone mineral density. THA is total hip arthroplasty.
Figure 2BMD measurement area in the lumbar spine and femur. A: Femoral neck area in BMD. B: Ward’s triangle of the femur area in BMD. C: The greater trochanter of femur area in BMD. D: Femoral shaft area in BMD. BMD is bone mineral density.
Clinical characteristics of the patients undergoing THA.
| Sum ( | Male ( | Female ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 54.7 ± 15.77 | 53.05 ± 17.28 | 55.54 ± 14.97 | 0.325 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.123 ± 4.168 | 24.64 ± 4.21 | 23.86 ± 4.14 | 0.24 |
| Blood loss volume(mL) | 280.1 ± 119.56 | 328.1 ± 150.76 | 255.9 ± 91.85 | 0.001 |
| T value (Total femoral) | −0.779 ± 1.645 | −0.289 ± 1.076 | −1.026 ± 1.823 | 0.001 |
| T value (Femoral neck) | −0.158 ± 2.238 | 0.263 ± 1.651 | −0.365 ± 2.463 | 0.084 |
| T value (Wards triangle) | −1.221 ± 1.855 | −0.774 ± 1.432 | −1.447 ± 2.004 | 0.023 |
| T value (Greater trochanter) | −1.043 ± 1.341 | −0.564 ± 1.115 | −1.285 ± 1.383 | 0.001 |
| T value (Total lumbar) | −0.429 ± 1.446 | −0.124 ± 1.465 | −0.567 ± 1.412 | 0.046 |
| T value (Lumbar nadir) | −0.943 ± 1.382 | −0.554 ± 1.415 | −1.139 ± 1.329 | 0.008 |
BMI: body mass index. The T value was measured using the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry method and represents the bone mineral content. The p value was the comparison between male patients and female patients.
Figure 3(A–C): Association between total blood loss volume and total lumbar T value, lumbar nadir T value, and total femoral T value. (D–F): Association between total blood loss volume and femoral neck T value, Ward’s triangle T value, and femoral greater trochanter T value.
Stepwise multiple linear regression analysis for the association between preoperative biomedical parameters and surgery blood loss volume in THA patients.
| All Subjects ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| β Value | Std β Value | T Value | ||
| T value (greater trochanter) | 0.026 | 0.0105 | 2.47 | 0.015 |
| T value (femoral neck) | −0.0127 | −0.00734 | −1.74 | 0.085 |
| T value (Ward’s triangle) | 0.00977 | 0.0102 | 0.96 | 0.339 |
| T value (Total lumbar) | 0.032 | 0.022 | 1.41 | 0.161 |
| T value (Lumbar nadir) | −0.039 | 0.024 | −1.61 | 0.109 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | −0.00311 | 0.00214 | −1.45 | 0.148 |
| Sex | 0.0604 | 0.0189 | 3.2 | 0.002 |
| A blood type OR not | −0.0872 | 0.114 | −0.77 | 0.444 |
| B blood type OR not | −0.0395 | 0.115 | −0.34 | 0.732 |
| O blood type OR not | −0.048 | 0.113 | −0.42 | 0.672 |
BMI, body mass index.
Figure 4ROC curves for bone density in THA patients. Panel (A): AUCROC 0.577 (95% CI: 0.492–0.661, p = 0.08). Panel (B): AUCROC 0.593 (95% CI: 0.507–0.678, p = 0.035). Panel (C): AUCROC 0.603 (95% CI: 0.519–0.688, p = 0.018).