| Literature DB >> 35886211 |
Kun Wang1,2, Xiaoyuan Feng1, Hongbo Li1, Yilong Ren1,2.
Abstract
When traffic collisions occur on urban expressways, the consequences, including injuries, the loss of lives, and damage to properties, are more serious. However, the existing research on the severity of expressway traffic collisions has not been deeply explored. The purpose of this research was to investigate how various factors affect the severity of urban expressway collisions. The severity of urban expressway collisions was set as the dependent variable, which could be divided into three categories: slight collisions, severe collisions, and fatal collisions. Ten variables, including individual characteristics, collision characteristics, and road environment conditions, were selected as independent factors. Based on 975 valid urban expressway collisions, an ordered logistic regression model was established to evaluate the impacts of influence factors on the severity of these crashes. The results show that gender, collision modality, road pavement conditions, road surface conditions, and visibility are significant factors that affect the severity of urban expressway collisions. Females were more likely to be involved in more severe urban expressway collisions than males. For collisions involving pedestrians and non-motorized vehicles, the risk of more severe injury was 7.508 times higher than that associated with vehicle-vehicle collisions. The probability of more severe collisions on urban expressways with poor pavement conditions and wet surface conditions is greater than that on urban expressways with good pavement conditions and dry surface conditions. In addition, as visibility increases, the probability of more severe collisions on urban expressways gradually decreases. These results provide more effective strategies to reduce casualties as a result of urban expressway collisions.Entities:
Keywords: collision severity; ordered logistic model; traffic safety; urban expressway
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35886211 PMCID: PMC9317156 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148362
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Sample characteristics.
| Attribute | Range | Traffic Collision | Percent of | Death | Percent of Death (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | male | 903 | 92.615 | 82 | 78.095 |
| female | 72 | 7.385 | 23 | 21.905 | |
| Collision modality | vehicle–pedestrian/cyclist collision | 101 | 10.359 | 39 | 37.143 |
| vehicle–vehicle collision | 874 | 89.641 | 66 | 62.857 | |
| Collision time | daytime | 622 | 63.795 | 41 | 39.048 |
| nighttime | 353 | 36.205 | 64 | 60.952 | |
| Road pavement conditions | good | 959 | 98.359 | 99 | 94.286 |
| bad | 16 | 1.641 | 6 | 5.714 | |
| Road surface conditions | dry | 887 | 90.974 | 85 | 80.952 |
| wet | 88 | 9.026 | 20 | 19.048 | |
| Road alignment | linear section | 810 | 83.077 | 85 | 80.952 |
| nonlinear section | 165 | 16.923 | 20 | 19.048 | |
| Presence of roadside protection | no | 173 | 17.744 | 12 | 11.429 |
| yes | 802 | 82.256 | 93 | 88.571 | |
| Traffic sign and marking | complete | 936 | 96.000 | 93 | 88.571 |
| incomplete | 39 | 4.000 | 12 | 11.429 | |
| Visibility (meter) | <50 | 62 | 6.359 | 5 | 4.762 |
| 50–100 | 113 | 11.590 | 31 | 29.524 | |
| 100–200 | 297 | 30.462 | 32 | 30.476 | |
| >200 | 503 | 51.590 | 37 | 35.238 | |
| Weather | sunny | 754 | 77.333 | 82 | 78.095 |
| cloudy | 72 | 7.385 | 7 | 6.667 | |
| rainy | 149 | 15.282 | 16 | 15.238 |
Example of coding profession variable.
| Visibility | Parameter Coding | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Visibility 1 (<50) | Visibility 2 (50~100) | Visibility 3 (100~200) | |
| Visibility 1 (<50) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Visibility 2 (50~100) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Visibility 3 (100~200) | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| Visibility 4 (>200) | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Result of multicollinearity test.
| Attribute | Collinear Statistics | Attribute | Collinear | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tolerance | VIF | Tolerance | VIF | ||
| Gender | 0.985 | 1.016 | Road alignment | 0.520 | 1.923 |
| Collision modality | 0.910 | 1.098 | Presence of a roadside protection | 0.542 | 1.846 |
| Collision time | 0.883 | 1.132 | Traffic sign and marking | 0.945 | 1.058 |
| Road pavement conditions | 0.959 | 1.043 | Visibility | 0.784 | 1.276 |
| Road surface conditions | 0.671 | 1.491 | Weather | 0.692 | 1.445 |
Parameter estimation result.
| Independent Variables | B | Exp (B) | Sig. | 95% Confidence Interval | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||||
| Gender (base: female) | −1.197 | 0.302 | 0.002 | −1.938 | −0.456 |
| Collision modality (base: vehicle–vehicle collision) | 2.016 | 7.508 | <0.000 | 1.384 | 2.648 |
| Collision time (base: nighttime) | −0.210 | 0.811 | 0.459 | −0.767 | 0.346 |
| Road pavement conditions (base: bad) | −2.255 | 0.105 | <0.000 | −3.479 | −1.03 |
| Road surface conditions (base: wet) | −0.926 | 0.396 | 0.009 | −1.619 | −0.233 |
| Road alignment (base: nonlinear section) | 0.935 | 2.547 | 0.067 | −0.065 | 1.936 |
| Presence of a roadside protection (base: yes) | −0.89 | 0.411 | 0.085 | −1.902 | 0.122 |
| Traffic sign and marking (base: incomplete) | 0.957 | 2.604 | 0.156 | −0.364 | 2.279 |
| Visibility (base: >200 m. unit: meters) | |||||
| <50 | 1.535 | 4.641 | 0.005 | 0.455 | 2.615 |
| 50–100 | 1.282 | 3.604 | 0.001 | 0.492 | 2.071 |
| 100–200 | 0.813 | 2.255 | 0.013 | 0.168 | 1.458 |
| Weather (base: rainy) | |||||
| Sunny | 0.476 | 1.610 | 0.357 | −0.538 | 1.490 |
| Cloudy | −0.666 | 1.514 | 0.366 | −2.111 | 0.779 |
| Intercepts (base: fatal collision) | |||||
| Slight collisions | 0.946 | 2.575 | 0.431 | −1.409 | 3.302 |
| Severity collisions | 1.233 | 3.432 | 0.305 | −1.124 | 3.59 |
|
| |||||
| Log-likelihood at zero | 603.880 | ||||
| Log-likelihood at convergence | 494.223 | ||||
| Nagelkerke R2 | 0.230 | ||||
| AIC | 518.223 | ||||
| Overall prediction accuracy | 92.205% | ||||
Comparison between the findings of this study and previous studies.
| Factor Attribute | This Study | Previous Studies on the Severity of Urban Expressway Collision | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (reference: female) | − | − | Ye et al., 2021 [ |
| Collision modality (reference: vehicle–vehicle collision) | + | Rarely attempted | |
| Road pavement conditions (reference: bad) | − | Rarely attempted | |
| Road surface conditions (reference: wet) | − | − | Lee and Li, 2014 [ |
| + | Zhu and Srinivasan, 2011 [ | ||
| Visibility | − | − | Shi and Deng, 2019 [ |
Notes: + indicates that variables are positively correlated with the severity of traffic collisions; − indicates that variables are negatively correlated with the severity of traffic collisions.