| Literature DB >> 35886192 |
Christine E Merrilees1, Laura K Taylor2, Marcie C Goeke-Morey3, Peter Shirlow4, E Mark Cummings5.
Abstract
Identifying how, when, and under what conditions exposure to political conflict is associated with youth mental health problems is critical to developing programming to help youth exposed to various forms of political violence. The current study uses Time Varying Effects Modeling (TVEM) to examine how relations between exposure to ethno-politically motivated antisocial behavior and mental health problems change as a function of age in a sample of youth from Belfast, Northern Ireland. Young people (N = 583, Mage 16.51 wave 1, 17.23 wave 2) self-reported their exposure to sectarian antisocial behavior, nonsectarian antisocial behavior, and mental health problems as part of a longitudinal study of youth across multiple neighborhoods in Belfast. The results suggest mental health problems and associations with exposure to sectarian antisocial behavior change in nonlinear patterns throughout adolescence, with the strongest links between exposure to political conflict and mental health between ages 16 and 19. Significant relations between nonsectarian antisocial behavior and mental health problems were not indicated for the full sample but the results suggested a relation emerged in later adolescence for Protestant youth, the historical majority group. The value of this exploratory approach to examining relations between key context and psychological variables for youth in contexts of political tension and violence is discussed.Entities:
Keywords: TVEM; developmental psychopathology; dynamic change; political violence
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35886192 PMCID: PMC9317634 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19148339
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 4.614
Means, standard deviations and possible ranges for main study variables.
| Age | SAB | NAB | GHQ |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | 0.38 (1.06) | 0.86 (1.21) | 6.00 (0) |
| 12 | 3.44 (9.96) | 0.71 (1.25) | 6.22 (2.77) |
| 13 | 0.97 (3.13) | 2.51 (2.45) | 7.43 (3.78) |
| 14 | 1.52 (4.07) | 2.56 (3.29) | 7.16 (4.20) |
| 15 | 2.18 (5.60) | 3.29 (3.47) | 6.30 (2.98) |
| 16 | 3.48 (6.91) | 4.41 (4.25) | 6.65 (3.81) |
| 17 | 2.69 (6.38) | 4.68 (4.47) | 7.14 (4.44) |
| 18 | 1.66 (4.82) | 5.30 (4.66) | 5.62 (2.91) |
| 19 | 1.58 (4.82) | 5.78 (4.27) | 5.50 (3.26) |
| 20 | 1.51(3.90) | 5.55 (4.19) | 6.68 (5.07) |
| 21 | 1.19 (2.68) | 6.25 (4.64) | 5.75(2.70) |
| Possible Range | 0–36 | 0–28 | 0–48 |
Figure 1Change in GHQ scores through adolescence for the whole sample.
Figure 2Changes in relations between SAB and GHQ through adolescence.
Figure 3Changes in relations between NAB and GHQ through adolescence.
Figure 4Changes in GHQ scores through adolescence for Catholics (a) and Protestants (b).
Figure 5Changes in relations between SAB and GHQ scores through adolescence for Catholics (a) and Protestants (b).
Figure 6Changes in relations between NAB and GHQ scores through adolescence for Catholics (a) and Protestants (b).