Literature DB >> 35885661

Unexpected Movement of the Esophagus across the Aorta.

Hyun Ho Choi1, Soo-Yoon Sung2, Yoon Ho Ko3.   

Abstract

Tumor regression throughout treatment would induce organ movement, but little is known of this in the esophagus. To achieve successful tumor regression, radiation therapy requires several weeks of radiation to be delivered accurately to the tumor. Usually, a 5-10 mm margin is allowed for set-up error and internal organ motion. Our case exhibited an unexpectedly large movement of the esophagus across the aorta with tumor regression that extended outside the margin and thus outside the radiotherapy field. These movements may affect subsequent invasive procedures or treatment during cancer therapy. After the unexpected large movement of the esophagus due to tumor regression, we revised the radiotherapy plan to reflect the new esophageal position. This implied that regular imaging and close monitoring are required during treatment of esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  esophagus; movement; tumor regression

Year:  2022        PMID: 35885661      PMCID: PMC9317508          DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-4418


A 79-year-old man was diagnosed with esophageal cancer during an evaluation of dysphagia. Upper endoscopy revealed a lumen-encircling mass 32 cm from the incisors (Figure 1); a biopsy specimen revealed squamous cell carcinoma. Distal esophageal wall thickening and multiple metastatic lymph nodes were observed upon computed tomography (CT) of the chest and abdomen (Figure 2A,B). The esophageal cancer stage was T4N2M0.
Figure 1

Endoscopic finding of the esophageal lesion.

Figure 2

Distal esophageal wall thickening (arrow) was found on axial view (A) and coronal view (B) of initial computed tomography (CT) scan. Metastatic lymph nodes were not seen on these CT slices. Follow-up computed tomography revealed that the esophagus had moved from the right of the aorta to the left on axial view (C) and coronal view (D) (arrow).

Definitive concurrent chemoradiation was scheduled. The radiation dose was 50.4 Gy/28 fractions over 5.5 weeks. The patient had received continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2) on days 1 through 4 and days 22 through 25 and cisplatin (75 mg/m2) was given on days 1 and 22. By 3 weeks after commencement of chemoradiation, the esophagus was outside of the radiotherapy field during image-guided radiotherapy. Follow-up CT revealed that the esophagus had moved from the right of the aorta to the left (Figure 2C,D). Fusion of the radiation plan and follow-up CT showed that prescription dose did not cover the entire esophagus (Figure 3).
Figure 3

(A) Initial radiation plan. Esophagus (red line) is covered with 95% of prescription dose. (colored area). (B) Radiation plan with moved esophagus (red line). Part of esophagus was outside radiation field.

Rumor regression throughout treatment would induce organ movement [1,2,3]. To achieve successful tumor regression, radiation therapy requires several weeks of radiation to be delivered accurately to the tumor [4]. Usually, a 5–10 mm margin is allowed for set-up error and internal organ motion. However, this case exhibited an unexpectedly large movement of the esophagus across the aorta with tumor regression that extended outside the margin and thus outside the radiotherapy field. Though organ movement with tumor regression is usually shown in the uterus, rectum and lung, little known of this in the esophagus [2,5]. These movements may affect subsequent invasive examinations or treatment during cancer therapy. In this case of unexpected large movement of the esophagus due to tumor regression, we revised the radiotherapy plan to reflect the new esophageal position. This implied that regular imaging and close monitoring are required during the treatment of esophageal cancer, especially for large esophageal lesions. Metal markers or clips would be helpful in monitoring the movement of the esophagus because they can be localized on a plain radiograph.
  5 in total

1.  Tumor regression and positional changes in non-small cell lung cancer during radical radiotherapy.

Authors:  Gerald Lim; Andrea Bezjak; Jane Higgins; Doug Moseley; Andrew J Hope; Alex Sun; John B C Cho; Anthony M Brade; Clement Ma; Jean-Pierre Bissonnette
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 15.609

2.  Neoadjuvant Carboplatin/Paclitaxel versus 5-Fluorouracil/Cisplatin in Combination with Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Multicenter Comparative Study.

Authors:  Xing Gao; Ping-Chung Tsai; Kai-Hao Chuang; Chu-Pin Pai; Po-Kuei Hsu; Shau-Hsuan Li; Hung-I Lu; Joseph Jan-Baptist van Lanschot; Yin-Kai Chao
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 6.575

3.  Cervix regression and motion during the course of external beam chemoradiation for cervical cancer.

Authors:  Beth M Beadle; Anuja Jhingran; Mohammad Salehpour; Marianne Sam; Revathy B Iyer; Patricia J Eifel
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Analysis of motion of the rectum during preoperative intensity modulated radiation therapy for rectal cancer using cone-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Hideomi Yamashita; Ryousuke Takenaka; Akira Sakumi; Akihiro Haga; Kuni Otomo; Keiichi Nakagawa
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Retrospective feasibility study of simultaneous integrated boost in cervical cancer using Tomotherapy: the impact of organ motion and tumor regression.

Authors:  Fernanda G Herrera; Sharon Callaway; Ela Delikgoz-Soykut; Mehtap Coskun; Laetitia Porta; Jean-Yves Meuwly; Joao Soares-Rodrigues; Leonie Heym; Raphael Moeckli; Mahmut Ozsahin
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 3.481

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.