| Literature DB >> 35884804 |
Stanisława Bazan-Socha1, Krzysztof Wójcik1, Magdalena Olchawa2, Tadeusz Sarna2, Jakub Pięta3, Bogdan Jakieła1, Jerzy Soja1, Krzysztof Okoń4, Jacek Zarychta1,5, Lech Zaręba6, Michał Stojak7, Daniel P Potaczek8, Jan G Bazan6, Magdalena Celińska-Lowenhoff1.
Abstract
Airway inflammation in asthma is related to increased reactive oxygen species generation, potentially leading to tissue injury and subsequent airway remodeling. We evaluated oxidative stress in peripheral blood from asthmatic subjects (n = 74) and matched controls (n = 65), using recently developed real-time monitoring of the protein hydroperoxide (HP) formation by the coumarin boronic acid (CBA) assay. We also investigated the relation of the systemic oxidative stress response in asthma to disease severity, lung function, airway remodeling indices (lung computed tomography and histology), and blood and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) inflammatory biomarkers. We documented enhanced systemic oxidative stress in asthma, reflected by 35% faster and 58% higher cumulative fluorescent product generation in the CBA assay (p < 0.001 for both). The dynamics of HP generation correlated inversely with lung function but not with asthma severity or histological measures of airway remodeling. HP generation was associated positively with inflammatory indices in the blood (e.g., C-reactive protein) and BAL (e.g., interleukin [IL]-6, IL-12p70, and neutrophil count). Bronchial obstruction, thicker airway walls, increased BAL IL-6, and citrullinated histone 3 in systemic circulation independently determined increased HP formation. In conclusion, a real-time CBA assay showed increased systemic HP generation in asthma. In addition, it was associated with inflammatory biomarkers, suggesting that proper disease control can also lead to a decrease in oxidative stress.Entities:
Keywords: CBA assay; airway remodeling; asthma; oxidative stress
Year: 2022 PMID: 35884804 PMCID: PMC9312921 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10071499
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomedicines ISSN: 2227-9059
Demographic characteristics and comorbidities in asthmatic patients and control individuals.
| Variables | Patients | Controls | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 53.5 ± 13.1 | 51.4 ± 12.3 | 0.63 |
| Male gender, | 19 (26) | 23 (35) | 0.22 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 26.9 ± 4.6 | 25.9 ± 3.4 | 0.1 |
| Past smoking, | 13 (18) | 15 (23) | 0.3 |
| Pack-years of smoking, | 0 (0–0) | 0 (0–0) | 0.59 |
| Living primarily in inner-city environments, | 39 (53) | 38 (58) | 0.57 |
| Internal medicine comorbidities | |||
| Hypertension, | 34 (46) | 25 (38) | 0.67 |
| Diabetes mellitus, | 11 (15) | 8 (12) | 0.68 |
| Hypercholesterolemia, | 21 (28) | 15 (23) | 0.52 |
Categorical variables are presented as n-numbers (percentages); continuous variables are presented as median and interquartile range, or mean and standard deviation, as appropriate.
Clinical characteristics of asthmatic patients, including airway imaging and histo(cyto)logy.
| Asthma duration, years | 10 (5–20) |
| Atopy, | 39 (53%) |
| Severe asthma, | 29 (39%) |
| Asthma severity (GINA) | |
| Mild, | 18 (24%) |
| Moderate, | 27 (36%) |
| Severe, | 29 (39%) |
| Asthma symptom control § | |
| Well-controlled asthma, | 22 (30%) |
| Not-well controlled asthma, | 33 (44%) |
| Very-poorly controlled asthma, | 19 (26%) |
| Spirometry values | |
| FEV1 before bronchodilator, % of the predicted value | 81.8 (66.6–99.4) |
| FEV1 after bronchodilator, % of the predicted value | 91.9 (73.2–104.1) |
| VC before bronchodilator, L | 3.2 (2.6–3.97) |
| VC after bronchodilator, L | 3.36 (2.7–4) |
| FEV1/VC (before bronchodilator) | 65.8 (57.4–72.6) |
| FEV1/VC (after bronchodilator) | 69.9 (63.2–77.5) |
| Computed tomography airway remodeling indices | |
|
| |
| Lumen area, mm2 | 12.5 (10–16) |
| Wall area, mm2 | 34.8 (27.9–45.4) |
| Wall thickness, mm | 1.9 (1.7–2.1) |
| Wall thickness ratio (WTR) | 24.1 ± 2.7 |
| Wall area ratio (WAR) | 73.2 ± 5.6 |
|
| |
| Lumen area, mm2 | 12.5 (9–18) |
| Wall area, mm2 | 35.1 ± 12.3 |
| Wall thickness, mm | 1.8 (1.6–2.1) |
| Wall thickness ratio (WTR) | 23.6 (22–25.9) |
| Wall area ratio (WAR) | 72.3 (68.5–76.9) |
| Bronchial biopsy histology | |
| Reticular basement membrane (RBM) thickness, μm ¥ | 6.49 (5.3–7.86) |
| Collagen I staining, % of the stroma showing reactivity | 30 (20–60) |
| Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BAL) cellularity # | |
| Macrophages, % | 85 (72–93) |
| Lymphocytes, % | 8 (4–15) |
| Neutrophils, % | 3 (2–5) |
| Eosinophils, % | 1 (0.1–2) |
| Eosinophils ≥2% in BAL, | 17 (37.5%) |
| Neutrophils ≥4% in BAL, | 29 (43.3%) |
| Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid biomarkers † | |
| Periostin, ng/mL | 0.85 (0.75–0.97) |
| Interleukin-6, pg/mL | 0.75 (0.1–1.19) |
| Interleukin-12(p70), pg/mL | 0.078 (0.05–0.12) |
| Asthma therapy | |
| Oral corticosteroids | 14 (19%) |
| Inhaled corticosteroids (persistent use) | 68 (92%) |
| Long-acting β2-agonists (persistent use) | 54 (73%) |
| Antileukotrienes | 10 (14%) |
| Theophylline | 8 (11%) |
| Long-acting anticholinergics (persistent use) | 5 (7%) |
Categorical variables are presented as numbers (percentages); continuous variables are presented as median and 0.25–0.75 quartiles, or mean and standard deviation, as appropriate. Abbreviations and references: BAL—bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, FEV1—forced expiratory volume in one second, GINA—Global Initiative for Asthma, L—liter, VC—vital capacity; § asthma symptom control (assessed based on Asthma Control Test results); # BAL cell differential data available in 67 asthma subjects; † BAL fluid levels of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-17A and interferon γ were below the detection threshold (data not shown); ¥ RBM available in 45 asthma subjects.
Figure 1Representative pictures of endobronchial biopsy specimens in a control subject (a) and asthma patient (b); the reticular basement membrane (RBM) is thicker in asthma. Other abbreviations: Epi—epithelium, Sub—subepithelium.
Figure 2(a) Representative curve of fluorescent product generation in the real-time coumarin boronic acid (CBA) assay of asthma patient and control individual (K—saturating concentration). (b) Saturating concentration (K), growth velocity (R factor), and cumulative fluorescent (FL) product generation in the real-time coumarin boronic acid (CBA) assay in asthma and control subjects. Abbreviations: FL—fluorescent, FLU—fluorescent unit, K—saturating concentration, R—velocity of fluorescent product growth, ** p < 0.001.
Figure 3Hydroperoxides’ generation in the coumarin boronic acid (CBA) assay was higher in females than males in the asthma group; * p < 0.05; for other abbreviations, see legend in Figure 1.
Figure 4Inverse correlation between hydroperoxide generation in coumarin boronic acid (CBA) assay and lung function; for abbreviations, see the legend in Figure 2 and Table 2.
Multiple linear regression model for a relative increase of fluorescent product growth velocity (R factor) in the real-time CBA assay in asthma patients. Presented variables are documented as independent determinants; however, they explain only 16% of the R factor variability.
| Fluorescent Product Growth Velocity (R Factor) | ||
|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI) | R2 | |
| FEV1, % | −0.18 (−0.31 to −0.04) | 0.16 |
| Wall thickness ratio (WTR), RB1 | 0.22 (0.08 to 0.36) | |
| Interleukin 6, BAL, pg/mL | 0.28 (0.14 to 0.41) | |
| Adjustment statistics | F = 2.9, | |
The resulting standardized regression coefficient (β) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) for a factor (independent variable) indicates the increase/decrease in standard deviations (SDs) of a dependent variable (R factor) when that particular factor increases by 1 SD and all other variables in the model remain unchanged. Abbreviations: RB1—the right upper lobe apical segmental bronchus; for other abbreviations, see footnote to Table 2.
Figure 5Positive correlations between dynamics in hydroperoxide generation in the real-time coumarin boronic acid (CBA) assay and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid biomarkers (interleukin [IL]-6, IL-12, and BAL neutrophilia); for abbreviations, see the legend in Figure 2 and Table 2.
Laboratory parameters in asthmatic patients and control subjects.
| Patients | Controls | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic laboratory tests | |||
| Hemoglobin, g/dL | 13.5 (13–14.4) | 13.9 ± 1.28 | 0.09 |
| Red blood cell count, 106/μL | 4.61 ± 0.43 | 4.6 ± 0.38 | 0.83 |
| White blood cell count, 103/μL | 6.68 (5.6–7.96) | 5.48 (4.82–6.64) | <0.001 ** |
| Eosinophils, 103/μL | 275 (135–470) | 15 (9–80) | <0.001 ** |
| Monocytes, 103/μL | 600 (485–815) | 480 (430–670) | <0.001 ** |
| Blood platelets, 103/μL | 218 (191–247) | 232 (203–293) | 0.01 * |
| C-reactive protein, mg/L | 2.55 (0.58–8.67) | 1 (0.9–1.7) | 0.04 * |
| Immunoglobulin E, IU/mL | 71.5 (29.4–380) | 22.6 (18.5–53.5) | 0.001 * |
| Glucose, mmol/L | 5 (4.65–5.55) | 5.17 ± 0.54 | 0.63 |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 4.83 ± 0.98 | 4.8 (4.25–5.35) | 0.74 |
| Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, mmol/L | 2.61 ± 0.76 | 3.38 ± 0.96 | <0.001 ** |
| High-density lipoprotein cholesterol, mmol/L | 1.34 (1.09–1.61) | 1.58 ± 0.41 | 0.01 * |
| Triglycerides, mmol/L | 1.4 (1–2) | 1.09 (0.82–1.42) | <0.001 ** |
| Biomarkers in serum § | |||
| Interleukin-6, pg/mL | 0.78 (0.45–2.09) | 0.73 ± 0.52 | 0.31 |
| Interleukin-10, pg/mL | 0.57 (0.25–0.97) | 0.005 (0.005–0.01) | <0.001 ** |
| Interleukin-12(p70), pg/mL | 0.005 (0.005–1.3) | 0.005 (0.005–1.69) | 0.75 |
| Interleukin-17A, pg/mL | 0.005 (0.005–0.12) | 0.005 (0.005–0.06) | 0.87 |
| Interferon-γ, pg/mL | 0.005 (0.005–0.28) | 0.11 (0.005–0.27) | 0.66 |
| Citrullinated histone H3, ng/mL | 16.3 (10.7–19.8) | 12.8 (8.2–17.6) | 0.04 * |
Variables are presented as median and interquartile range, or mean and standard deviation, as appropriate. References: § all serum measurements of interleukin (IL)-4 and IL-5 were below the assay threshold (data not shown); ** p < 0.001; * p < 0.05 and p ≥ 0.001.
Figure 6Relationships between cumulative hydroperoxide generation in the real-time coumarin boronic acid (CBA) assay and red blood cell count (a) peripheral blood monocyte count (b), circulating C-reactive protein (c), and fibrinogen (d); for abbreviations, see the legend in Figure 2 and Table 2.
Multiple linear regression model for a relative increase of fluorescent product growth velocity (R factor) in the real-time CBA assay in asthma patients. Presented variables were documented as independent determinants; they explain 33% of R factor variability.
| Fluorescent Product Growth Velocity (R Factor) | ||
|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI) | R2 | |
| Monocyte count, 103/μL | 0.14 (0.02 to 0.28) | 0.33 |
| Red blood cell count, 106/μL | −0.58 (−0.73 to −0.43) | |
| Blood eosinophilia, 103/μL | −0.23 (−0.41 to −0.06) | |
| Citrulinated histone 3, ng/mL | 0.22 (0.07 to 0.37) | |
| Interleukin 17A, pg/mL | 0.26 (0.13 to 0.4) | |
| Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 0.22 (0.08 to 0.37) | |
| Adjustment statistics | F = 3.3, | |
For data interpretation, see footnote to Table 3.
Multiple linear regression model for a relative increase of fluorescent product growth velocity (R factor) in the real-time CBA assay in asthma patients, considering all study variables.
| Fluorescent Product Growth Velocity (R Factor) | ||
|---|---|---|
| β (95% CI) | R2 | |
| FEV1, % | −0.21 (−0.34 to −0.07) | 0.26 |
| Red blood cell count, 106/μL | −0.26 (−0.39 to −0.12) | |
| Citrulinated histone 3, ng/mL | 0.35 (0.23 to 0.47) | |
| Interleukin 6, BAL, pg/mL | 0.19 (0.08 to 0.31) | |
| Adjustment statistics | F = 5.04, | |
For data interpretation, see footnote to Table 3. For the abbreviations, see footnote to Table 2.