Literature DB >> 35884765

Correction: Dagan et al. A Lifespan Development Theory of Insecure Attachment and Internalizing Symptoms: Integrating Meta-Analytic Evidence via a Testable Evolutionary Mis/Match Hypothesis. Brain Sci. 2021, 11, 1226.

Or Dagan1, Ashley M Groh2, Sheri Madigan3, Kristin Bernard1.   

Abstract

In the original article [...].

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35884765      PMCID: PMC9312824          DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12070820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Sci        ISSN: 2076-3425


Error in Table

In the original article [1], there was a mistake in Table 1 as published. The confidence interval reported for the comparison between insecure-dismissing and secure attachment adolescence and adulthood classification groups was wrong. The corrected Table 1 appears below. The authors apologize for any inconvenience caused and state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. The original article has been updated.
Table 1

List of meta-analyses assessing the magnitude of the links between insecure attachment patterns and internalizing symptoms.

Author (Year)Attachment MeasuresMost Prevalent Symptoms MeasuresAttachment Group Comparison k N Cohen’s d(95% CI)Heterogeneity
CHILDHOOD
Groh et al. (2012) [60]SSPCBCLA versus B+C+D2231190.17 (0.03, 0.31)Q(21) = 32.82 *
C versus B+A+D2130780.03 (−0.11, 0.17)Q(20) = 26.05
Madigan et al. (2013) [53]SSPCBCL, TRFA versus B2118520.29 (0.12, 0.45)Q(20) = 33.78 *
C versus B2118230.10 (−0.12, 0.32)Q(20) = 30.11 *
A versus C19664−0.17 (−0.41, 0.06)Q(18) = 48.35 **
ADOLESCENCE AND ADULTHOOD
Dagan et al. (2018) [61]AAIBDI, CES-DDs versus F4328810.09 (−0.03, 0.22)Q(42) = 90.68 ***
E versus F3820790.48 (0.30, 0.65)Q(37) = 71.90 ***
E versus Ds3712850.34 (0.19, 0.50)Q(36) = 47.65
Dagan et al. (2020) [62]AAIBSI, SCL-90-RDs versus F504376−0.02 (−0.10, 0.05)Q(49) = 68.09 *
E versus F4232710.35 (0.19, 0.50)Q(41) = 99.53 ***
E versus Ds4121840.31 (0.15, 0.47)Q(40) = 88.99 ***

Bolded letters represent the attachment classification groups associated with significantly more reported symptoms compared with the other group(s). k = Number of studies; N = Number of participants; AAI = Adult Attachment Interview; SSP = Strange Situation Procedure; BDI = Beck Depression Inventory (self-report); BSI = Brief Symptom Inventory (self-report); CBCL = Child Behavior Checklist (parent report); CES-D = Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (self-report); SCL-90-R = Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (self-report); TRF = Teacher’s Report Form; A = Insecure-Avoidant; B = Secure; C = Insecure-Resistant; Ds = Insecure-Dismissing; E = Insecure-Preoccupied; F = Secure-Autonomous. * p < 0.05. ** p < 0.01. *** p < 0.001.

  1 in total

Review 1.  A Lifespan Development Theory of Insecure Attachment and Internalizing Symptoms: Integrating Meta-Analytic Evidence via a Testable Evolutionary Mis/Match Hypothesis.

Authors:  Or Dagan; Ashley M Groh; Sheri Madigan; Kristin Bernard
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-09-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.