Literature DB >> 35884207

Antibiotic Exposure during the Preceding Six Months Is Related to Intestinal ESBL-Producing Enterobacteriaceae Carriage in the Elderly.

Man Zhang1,2,3, Xiaohua Qin1,2, Baixing Ding1,2, Zhen Shen1,2,4, Zike Sheng1,2,5, Shi Wu1,2, Yang Yang1,2, Xiaogang Xu1,2, Fupin Hu1,2, Xiaoqin Wang6, Yu Zhang3, Minggui Wang1,2.   

Abstract

Intestinal carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-PE carriage) poses a health risk to the elderly. It was aimed to study the prevalence and the risk factors of intestinal ESBL-PE carriage in the elderly. An observational study of a 921-elderly cohort was examined at health checkup for intestinal ESBL-PE carriage at a tertiary medical center in Shanghai. The prevalence and risk factors of intestinal ESBL-PE carriage, especially antimicrobial use in the preceding 9 months, were studied. The prevalence of intestinal ESBL-PE carriage was 53.3% (491/921) in community-dwelling elderly people. A total of 542 ESBL-producing isolates, including E. coli (n = 484) and K. pneumoniae (n = 58), were obtained. On genotyping, the CTX-M-9 ESBL was the most prevalent for 66.0% (358/542) of all isolates. Multivariate analysis showed that antibiotic exposure, age (61-70 years), and nursing home residence were independent risk factors of the ESBL-PE carriage. The analysis on the monthly use of antimicrobials showed that antibiotic exposure during the 6 months prior to sample collection contributed to the high prevalence of ESBL-PE carriage. A single exposure to an antimicrobial increased the risk of the carriage significantly, and the risk increased with the frequency of antimicrobial exposure (RR, 1.825 to 5.255). Prior use of second or third generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and macrolides increased the risk of the carriage. The results of this study indicate the importance of using antimicrobials judiciously in clinical settings to reduce antimicrobial resistance. Further studies with multiple center surveillance and with comparison of ESBL-PE carriage in the elderly and in the general population simultaneously are needed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterobacteriaceae; elderly; extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs); infection; intestinal carriage; risk factor

Year:  2022        PMID: 35884207      PMCID: PMC9312271          DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11070953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)        ISSN: 2079-6382


1. Introduction

China had a population of 138 million people aged 65 years or older, 10.1% of the total population, at the end of 2014 [1]. This proportion surpassed the World Health Organization’s definition of an aging society, i.e., people aged 60 years or older account for at least 10% of the total population. Elderly people are highly susceptible to a variety of infections, including those of the respiratory, urinary, and intestinal tract, due to multiple underlying diseases and a compromised immune system. Bacteria belonging to the family Enterobacteriaceae are most commonly implicated in infections of the elderly [2]. Infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs)-producing gram negative bacilli have become more prevalent in recent years with the extensive use of third generation cephalosporins. A number of countries and regions have reported outbreaks of hospital infections caused by ESBL-producers [3]. ESBL-producers may also contribute to community-acquired infections [4,5]. They are challenging and expensive to treat. Reportedly, bloodstream infections caused by ESBL-producers are one of the most important risk factors for mortality among elderly patients [6]. Gut-colonizing Enterobacteriaceae constitute a reservoir of pathogens for many clinical infections, especially those related to healthcare [7]. In a recent report, for example, fecal microbiota was transplanted from a single donor to two recipients enrolled in independent clinical trials to manage recurrent or refractory Clostridioides difficile infection. The donor was not adequately screened for ESBL–producing E. coli, however, and both recipients developed bacteremia subsequent to transplantation; one recipient died. This case highlights the clinical relevance of intestinal ESBL-PE carriage and enhanced donor screening prior to fecal transplantation [8]. Intestinal ESBL-PE carriage in healthy elderly individuals has been little studied. Rather, most studies have focused on the prevalence of ESBL-PE carriage in nursing home residents. The reported prevalence was 3% to 11.2% in Sweden, Hungary, Belgium, and Germany [9,10], and 40.5% to 53% in Northern Ireland and Japan [10,11]. In 2014, intestinal ESBL-PE carriage was identified in 46.9% of 390 residents (≥65 years of age) in seven nursing homes in Shanghai, China [12]. It follows then that nursing home residence, prior antibiotic use, cardiovascular diseases, chronic renal insufficiency, solid tumor, Alzheimer’s disease, and repeated hospital admission significantly impact intestinal ESBL-PE carriage [13,14]. In summary, intestinal ESBL-PE carriage may seriously impair health of the elderly. The current study involved a relatively large cohort of healthy, community-dwelling elderly people living in Shanghai to study the prevalence of intestinal ESBL-PE carriage. The medical details in the preceding 9 months, especially the antimicrobial use, of the cohort were reviewed to study the risk factors of ESBL-PE carriage in the elderly.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Design and Cohort Enrollment

This study was designed as a cohort study in the elderly. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review board of Huashan Hospital. The subjects were informed of the study in detail and an oral informed consent was obtained from each participant. Elderly individuals (≥60 years of age) who came to Huashan Hospital, Fudan University for regular health checkups were sampled by anal swab (CE0123, COPAN Diagnostics Inc., Murrieta, CA, USA). Participants were assigned to the ESBL-PE carrier or noncarrier group based upon the isolation of ESBL-PE.

2.2. Strain Identification and Characterization

Anal swab samples were streaked onto plates composed of CHROMagar chromogenic media (CHROMagarTM Microbiology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) that contained cefotaxime (2 μg/mL) to select for ESBL-producing isolates. The red and blue colonies on chromogenic plates were Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, respectively. Species were further identified using the VITEK 2 GN ID Panel and standard methods. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 14 antimicrobial agents for the ESBL-producing isolates were determined by agar dilution. The results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing were interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute breakpoints [15]. Intermediate (I) is a category defined by a breakpoint that includes isolates with MICs within the intermediate range that approach usually attainable blood and tissue levels and/or for which response rates may be lower than for susceptible isolates. The ESBL-producing isolates were genotyped for specific antibiotic-resistant genes (including CTX-M, SHV, and TEM) using recommended PCR primers and methodology [16]. One hundred E. coli isolates were selected randomly for homology analysis by multilocus sequence typing (MLST), using databases that are available at http://mlst.warwick.ac.uk/mlst/dbs/Ecoli (accessed on 25 April 2021).

2.3. Healthcare Details

Huashan Hospital is the only hospital dedicated to the healthcare of the study participants. All their clinic visits, in-hospital care, and regular health checkups were completed at Huashan Hospital. The medical record was reviewed to collect healthcare details for each subject in the 9 months prior to anal swab sampling. These details included age, sex, body mass index, underlying diseases, antimicrobial use in the preceding 9 months, usage of gastrointestinal modulators (gastric mucosal protective agents, probiotics, laxatives, and digestive enzymes), and prior international travel and hospital admission.

2.4. Statistical Analysis

SPSS software 23.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) was used for statistical analysis. Continuous variables with normal distribution were expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and compared using Student’s t-test. A nonparametric test was used to compare the data with skewed distribution. The difference between groups was determined by the Pearson Chi-square test. Univariate logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors for ESBL-PE carriage. The significant variables in univariate analysis (p ≤ 0.05) were included in multivariate logistic regression analysis to correct for confounding factors. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Intestinal Carriage of ESBL-PE

ESBL-PE were carried by 491 (53.3%) of 921 community-dwelling elderly people; the remainder were noncarriers. A total of 542 ESBL-producing isolates, including E. coli (n = 484) and K. pneumoniae (n = 58), obtained from these 491 subjects were identified. Fifty-one subjects carried both E. coli and K. pneumoniae. Of the ESBL-producing E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates, 12.2% and 25.9%, respectively, were resistant to ceftazidime, 4.6% and 5.2%, respectively, were resistant to cefepime, and 59.5% and 55.2%, respectively, were resistant to levofloxacin; ≤1.7% of isolates were resistant to piperacillin-tazobactam or amikacin (Table 1).
Table 1

Antimicrobial susceptibility of the intestinal colonizing ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates collected from elderly study participants.

Antimicrobial AgentMIC (μg/mL)%
MIC RangeMIC50MIC90SusceptibleIntermediateResistant
E. coli (n = 484)
Ampicillin32–>128>128>12800100
Cefotaxime2–>12832>12801.099.0
Ceftazidime0.125–>12843276.011.812.2
Cefepime0.06–>12841686.88.64.6
Cefoxitin0.5–>12841686.64.49.0
Meropenem0.06–0.50.060.0610000
Imipenem0.06–0.50.060.510000
Piperacillin-tazobactam1–642499.20.80
Levofloxacin0.06–6421636.44.159.5
Amikacin1–>1282499.200.8
K. pneumoniae (n = 58)
Ampicillin32–>128>128>12800100
Cefotaxime0.125 –>12832>12803.496.6
Ceftazidime0.25–>12843265.58.625.9
Cefepime0.06–>12841686.28.65.2
Cefoxitin2–>1284>12874.16.919.0
Meropenem0.06–0.50.060.0610000
Imipenem0.06–0.50.060.510000
Piperacillin-tazobactam1–642498.31.70
Levofloxacin0.06–6421634.510.355.2
Amikacin1–>1282498.301.7
Fosfomycin0.125–320.25810000

MIC = minimum inhibitory concentration.

On genotyping, the CTX-M-9 β-lactamase group was the most prevalent for both E. coli and K. pneumoniae, accounting for 66.0% (358/542) of all isolates. The CTX-M-9 group accounted for 66.7% (323/484) of the ESBL-producing E. coli isolates, followed by the CTX-M-1 group (34.9%, 169/484), the CTX-M-2 group (3.7%, 18/484), and SHV types (0.4%, 2/484). The CTX-M-9 group accounted for 60.3% (35/58) of the ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae isolates, followed by the CTX-M-1 (29.3%, 17/58) and CTX-M-2 (10.3%, 6/58) groups. Two isolates of ESBL-producing E. coli isolates but no K. pneumoniae isolates expressing the SHV ESBL genotype were identified, and all the isolates were detected TEM-1 positive. MLST analysis of 100 randomly selected E. coli isolates identified 26 different ST types. A total of 20 isolates expressed ST131, 16 expressed ST648, 14 expressed ST1193, 7 expressed ST10, 5 expressed ST69, and 5 expressed ST48; 3 or fewer isolates expressed the other ST types.

3.2. Risk Factors for Intestinal ESBL-PE Carriage in the Elderly

The clinical variables of ESBL-PE carriers (n = 491) and noncarriers (n = 430) were compared (Table 2). Univariate analysis revealed that relevant to noncarriers, intestinal ESBL-PE carriage was more prevalent in the 61–70 age group than the 71–80 and ≥81 groups. In addition, antibiotic exposure, sex (female), nursing home residence, and prior international travel were risk factors for intestinal ESBL-PE carriage. Multivariate analysis showed that antibiotic exposure, age (61–70 years), and nursing home residence were independent risk factors associated with intestinal ESBL-PE carriage.
Table 2

Univariate and multivariate analyses of the risk factors for intestinal carriage of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in the elderly.

Risk FactorCarriers (n = 491)no. (%)Noncarriers (n = 430)no. (%)Univariate AnalysisMultivariate Analysis
p ValueOR (95% CI)p ValueOR (95% CI)
Age, years
61–70100 (20.4)41 (9.5) 1
71–80190 (38.7)158 (36.7)0.0010.493 (0.324, 0.751)0.0010.419 (0.249, 0.706)
≥81201 (40.9)231 (53.7)<0.0010.357 (0.237, 0.537)<0.0010.312 (0.186, 0.522)
Sex (male/female)431/60387/430.0010.427 (0.259, 0.704)0.5330.847 (0.503, 1.427)
Hypertension308 (62.7)275 (64.0)0.7010.949 (0.725, 1.241)
Coronary artery disease101 (20.6)98 (22.8)0.4140.877 (0.640, 1.201)
Respiratory tract diseases a90 (18.3)85 (19.8)0.5790.911 (0.655, 1.267)
Diabetes mellitus136 (27.7)95 (22.1)0.0501.351 (0.999, 1.827)0.1161.348 (0.929, 1.956)
Benign prostatic hyperplasia55 (11.2)48 (11.2)0.9851.004 (0.666, 1.514)
Constipation27 (5.5)19 (4.4)0.4531.259 (0.690, 2.298)
Prior surgery95 (19.4)81 (18.8)0.8441.034 (0.743, 1.437)
Tumor31 (6.3)22 (5.1)0.4361.250 (0.712, 2.193)
Thyroid disease7 (1.4)16 (3.7)0.0260.374 (0.152, 0.918)0.280.604 (0.242, 1.506)
Prostate disease80 (16.3)80 (18.6)0.3560.852 (0.605, 1.198)
Peptic ulcer29 (5.9)35 (8.1)0.1840.708 (0.425, 1.180)
Liver disease29 (5.9)26 (6.1)0.9290.975 (0.565, 1.684)
Use of gastric mucosal protective agent104 (21.2)85 (19.8)0.5961.091 (0.791, 1.504)
Oral probiotics62 (12.6)60 (14.0)0.5540.891 (0.609, 1.305)
Laxatives85 (17.3)83 (19.3)0.4350.875 (0.626, 1.223)
Oral digestive enzymes48 (9.8)59 (13.7)0.0620.681 (0.454, 1.022)
Long-term steroid use7 (1.4)9 (2.1)0.4390.677 (0.250, 1.832)
Self-care deficit13 (2.7)10 (2.3)0.7551.142 (0.496, 2.632)
Nursing home residence166 (33.8)32 (7.4)<0.0016.353 (4.234, 9.532)<0.0019.13 (5.526, 15.085)
International travel67 (13.7)8 (1.9)<0.0018.335 (3.955, 17.566)0.0882.112 (0.896, 4.982)
Antibiotic exposure415 (84.5)157 (36.5)<0.0019.495 (6.939, 12.992)<0.00111.12 (7.734, 15.989)
Hospital admission40 (8.2)29 (6.7)0.4201.226 (0.746, 2.015)

a Includes chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchiectasis, and lung cancer. OR denotes odds ratio and CI denotes confidence interval.

3.3. Effect of Antibiotic Exposure on Intestinal ESBL-PE Carriage

The monthly use of antimicrobials during the 9-month period prior to sample collection was analyzed retrospectively to explore the relationship between time of antibiotic exposure and intestinal ESBL-PE carriage. Comparing use in ESBL-PE carriers and noncarriers, the p values for each of the 6 months just prior to sampling were <0.001 with RR values of 2.014–3.979 (Table 3). No statistical difference between carriers and noncarriers was observed for individuals exposed to antibiotics 7- to 9-months prior to sampling. The results indicated that intestinal ESBL-PE carriage increased markedly in people exposed to antibiotics during the 6 months prior to sample collection.
Table 3

Time of prior antimicrobial use and intestinal ESBL-PE carriage in the elderly.

Month Prior to SamplingAntimicrobial Exposure
Carriers (n = 780)no. (%)Noncarriers (n = 492)no. (%)p ValueRR (95% CI)
No exposure76 (9.7)273 (55.5)<0.0010.176 (0.140, 0.221)
1st month60 (7.7)11 (2.2)<0.0013.441 (1.827, 6.479)
2nd month108 (13.8)28 (5.7)<0.0012.433 (1.631, 3.630)
3rd month95 (12.2)18 (3.7)<0.0013.329 (2.037, 5.440)
4th month110 (14.1)23 (4.7)<0.0013.017 (1.953, 4.661)
5th month99 (12.7)31 (6.3)<0.0012.014 (1.368, 2.967)
6th month82 (10.5)13 (2.6)<0.0013.979 (2.241, 7.064)
7th month56 (7.2)31 (6.3)0.5451.139 (0.746, 1.741)
8th month45 (5.8)28 (5.7)0.9531.014 (0.641, 1.603)
9th month49 (6.3)36 (7.3)0.4720.859 (0.567, 1.300)

n, total episodes of antimicrobial exposure during the 9 months prior to sampling; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.

A single exposure to an antimicrobial during the 9 months prior to sample collection increased the risk of intestinal ESBL-PE carriage significantly compared to no exposure (p < 0.001) (Table 4). Moreover, the risk of intestinal ESBL-PE carriage increased with the frequency of antimicrobial exposure (RR, 1.825 to 5.255).
Table 4

Correlation between the frequency of intestinal ESBL-PE carriage and antimicrobial exposure during the 9 months prior to sample collection.

Frequency of Antimicrobial ExposureESBL-PE Carriers (n = 491)n (%)ESBL-PE Noncarriers (n = 430)n (%)p ValueRR (95% CI)
076 (15.5)273 (63.5)<0.0010.244 (0.196, 0.303)
1250 (50.9)120 (27.9)<0.0011.825 (1.532, 2.173)
277 (15.7)18 (4.2)<0.0013.746 (2.280, 6.155)
352 (10.6)13 (3.0)<0.0013.503 (1.934, 6.344)
≥436 (7.3)6 (1.4)<0.0015.255 (2.236, 12.349)

ESBL-PE = ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae; CI = confidence interval; RR = relative risk.

Prior use of second generation cephalosporins (p = 0.001), third generation cephalosporins (p < 0.001), fluoroquinolones (p < 0.001), and macrolides (p = 0.013) increased the risk of intestinal ESBL-PE carriage (Table 5). Treatment with third generation cephalosporins had the most prominent effect (RR = 2.557).
Table 5

Correlation between intestinal ESBL-PE carriage and antimicrobial exposure during the 9 months prior to sample collection.

AntimicrobialsAntimicrobials Exposure
ESBL-PE Carriers (n = 780)n (%)ESBL-PE Noncarriers (n = 492)n (%)p ValueRR (95%CI)
No exposure76 (9.7)273 (55.5)<0.0010.176 (0.140, 0.221)
1st generation cephalosporins37 (4.7)24 (4.9)0.9131.822 (1.269, 2.617)
2nd generation cephalosporins104 (13.3)36 (7.3)0.0012.048 (1.662, 2.525)
3rd generation cephalosporins289 (37.1)89 (18.1)<0.0012.557 (1.947, 3.359)
Fluoroquinolones223 (28.6)55 (11.2)<0.0012.334 (1.171, 4.650)
Macrolides37 (4.7)10 (2.0)0.0131.766 (0.640, 4.873)
Others14 (1.8)5 (1.0)0.2651.822 (1.269, 2.617)

ESBL-PE = ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae; n = sum of antimicrobial exposures during the 9 months prior to sampling; RR = relative risk.

4. Discussion

The present study found that intestinal ESBL-PE carriage is high (53%) in community-dwelling elderly residents. The results of this study demonstrate that antimicrobial exposure during the preceding 6 months significantly increased the risk of intestinal ESBL-PE colonization. This is a much longer period than reported in previous studies that showed antibiotic exposure only within the past 3 months or less influenced the intestinal carriage of ESBL-PE [10,11,12]. Similarly, the guidelines for hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia states that the previous intravenous antibiotic used within the past 3 months was one of the risk factors of multi-drug resistant pathogen infections [17]. Recently, the guidance for treatment of antibiotic-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections states that clinicians should consider antibiotic exposures in the past 30 days when prescribing empiric treatment for a given patient [18]. An earlier study showed a median duration of 6.6 months (3.4–13.4-month range) for ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae carriage in inpatients [19]. Based upon the results of both the current and a few previous studies, it is recommended that infectious diseases only be treated with antimicrobials not used in the past 6 months, rather than the past 3 months. In our previous study with a small number of participants in 2013, the intestinal ESBLs-producing E. coli isolates were detected in 7% (3/41) of healthy volunteers [20]. Overall prevalence of ESBLs-PE carriage in the general population in Netherland from 2013 to 2017 was 4.3% (260/5983) [21]. Therefore, it is likely the ESBL-PE carriage in the elderly is much higher than that of the general population based on this study and previous reports [10,11]. This might be attributed to more antibiotics exposure in the elderly. The results of this study document the importance of using antimicrobials judiciously in clinical settings. Prudent antimicrobial use is the key to containing the following vicious cycle: (1) induction of multiple drug resistant (MDR) bacteria such as ESBL-PE carriage by overusing antimicrobials [10]; (2) followed by challenging, inappropriate, and long-term antimicrobial treatment of subsequent infections; and (3) emergence of more extensively drug-resistant pathogens. This study documents the influence of antimicrobial exposure on the carriage of MDR bacteria; use of antimicrobials in the prior 6 months influences MDR bacteria carriage. There are several limitations in this study. This study was limited to a single center. The prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae was only carried out in the elderly, but not in the general population simultaneously to compare the variability of ESBL-PE carriage in difference populations. Moreover, the MLST typing was performed with 100 randomly selected isolates, but not in all the 484 ESBL-producing E. coli isolates. It is better to identify the specific CTX-M type of all the ESBL-producing isolates rather than just the CTX-M grouping. Future studies will be undertaken to elucidate further the relevance of ESBL-PE carriage to clinical practice.
  20 in total

1.  Epidemiology and risk factors for faecal extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (ESBL-E) carriage derived from residents of seven nursing homes in western Shanghai, China.

Authors:  S-Y Zhao; J Zhang; Y-L Zhang; Y-C Wang; S-Z Xiao; F-F Gu; X-K Guo; Y-X Ni; L-Z Han
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.451

2.  Duration of colonization by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae after hospital discharge.

Authors:  Gabriel Birgand; Laurence Armand-Lefevre; Isabelle Lolom; Etienne Ruppe; Antoine Andremont; Jean-Christophe Lucet
Journal:  Am J Infect Control       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.918

3.  Management of Adults With Hospital-acquired and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia: 2016 Clinical Practice Guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society.

Authors:  Andre C Kalil; Mark L Metersky; Michael Klompas; John Muscedere; Daniel A Sweeney; Lucy B Palmer; Lena M Napolitano; Naomi P O'Grady; John G Bartlett; Jordi Carratalà; Ali A El Solh; Santiago Ewig; Paul D Fey; Thomas M File; Marcos I Restrepo; Jason A Roberts; Grant W Waterer; Peggy Cruse; Shandra L Knight; Jan L Brozek
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  Dynamics of Intestinal Carriage of Extended-Spectrum Beta-lactamase-Producing Enterobacteriaceae in the Dutch General Population, 2014-2016.

Authors:  Gerrita van den Bunt; Ad C Fluit; Martin C J Bootsma; Engeline van Duijkeren; Jelle Scharringa; Wilfrid van Pelt; Marc J M Bonten
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Asymptomatic faecal carriage of ESBL producing enterobacteriaceae in Hungarian healthy individuals and in long-term care applicants: A shift towards CTX-M producers in the community.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ebrahimi; Julianna Mózes; Júlia Mészáros; Ágnes Juhász; László Majoros; Krisztina Szarka; Gábor Kardos
Journal:  Infect Dis (Lond)       Date:  2016-03-16

6.  Rectal Colonization by Drug Resistant Bacteria in Nursing Home Residents in Crete, Greece.

Authors:  Aikaterini Moschou; Petros Ioannou; Eleni Moraitaki; Dimitra Stafylaki; Sofia Maraki; George Samonis; Diamantis P Kofteridis
Journal:  Trop Med Infect Dis       Date:  2021-07-05

7.  Comparison of adhesin genes and antimicrobial susceptibilities between uropathogenic and intestinal commensal Escherichia coli strains.

Authors:  Xiaohua Qin; Fupin Hu; Shi Wu; Xinyu Ye; Demei Zhu; Ying Zhang; Minggui Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in a nursing home setting compared with elderly living at home: a cross-sectional comparison.

Authors:  Andreas Blom; Jonas Ahl; Fredrik Månsson; Fredrik Resman; Johan Tham
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 3.090

9.  Risk factors of fecal colonization with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in special nursing homes in Japan.

Authors:  Kumi Yokoyama; Yuki Uehara; Takashi Sasaki; Keiichi Hiramatsu
Journal:  J Gen Fam Med       Date:  2018-03-23

10.  Seasonality in carriage of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in the general population: a pooled analysis of nationwide cross-sectional studies.

Authors:  C C H Wielders; E Van Duijkeren; G Van Den Bunt; A P Meijs; C M Dierikx; M J M Bonten; W Van Pelt; E Franz; S C De Greeff
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 2.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.