| Literature DB >> 35884148 |
Giovani Marco Stingelin1, Marina Lopes Mechler-Dreibi1, Gabriel Yuri Storino1, Karina Sonalio1, Henrique Meiroz de Souza Almeida1, Fernando Antônio Moreira Petri1, Luís Guilherme de Oliveira1.
Abstract
Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae is the primary agent of Swine Enzootic Pneumonia (SEP). Vaccines reduce the clinical manifestation of the disease but do not prevent infection. The present study aimed to evaluate the use of antimicrobial drugs to minimize the impact of M. hyopneumoniae. For this, 32 pregnant female pigs and their litters were selected and then followed from birth to slaughter. The study involved three experimental groups that received metaphylactic treatment with different protocols involving tilmicosin, valnemulin, tulathromycin, and a control group to compare the effect of treatments against M. hyopneumoniae infection throughout the phases. Performance data were recorded, and the piglets were evaluated for the occurrence of cough. Nasal swab and blood collection was conducted periodically to detect M. hyopneumoniae shedding and anti-M. hyopneumoniae IgG, respectively. At slaughter, the lungs of animals from all groups were evaluated, and samples were collected for histopathological examination and qPCR for M. hyopneumoniae detection. All protocols promoted a reduction in consolidation lung lesions when compared to the control group. Individuals treated with valnemulin showed increased performance results, lower mortality, and low bacterial load in the lung. The results are promising and may indicate an alternative in the strategic control of M. hyopneumoniae infection in pigs.Entities:
Keywords: enzootic pneumonia; metaphylaxis; piglets; respiratory diseases
Year: 2022 PMID: 35884148 PMCID: PMC9311983 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11070893
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
Mean S/P value for IgG anti-Mhyo between groups over time for each time point (T) from T1 to T6 (151 days of age for G1, G2 and G3 pigs and 145 days of age for G4 pigs).
| Points | Group | Mean * | Median Standard Error | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 (24 days) | G1 | 0.32 a | 0.14 | 2.35 × 10−1 |
| G2 | 0.10 a | 0.04 | ||
| G3 | 0.05 a | 0.04 | ||
| G4 | 0.26 a | 0.14 | ||
| T2 (45 days) | G1 | 0.07 a | 0.03 | 2.7 × 10−1 |
| G2 | 0.07 a | 0.02 | ||
| G3 | 0.09 a | 0.03 | ||
| G4 | 0.24 a | 0.13 | ||
| T3 (63 days) | G1 | 0.19 b | 0.05 | 2.3 × 10−5 |
| G2 | 0.10 a | 0.15 | ||
| G3 | 0.18 b | 0.05 | ||
| G4 | 0.60 ab | 0.18 | ||
| T4 (93 days) | G1 | 0.52 a | 0.17 | 1.5 × 10−1 |
| G2 | 1.04 a | 0.19 | ||
| G3 | 0.53 a | 0.19 | ||
| G4 | 0.68 a | 0.16 | ||
| T5 (123 days) | G1 | 1.09 a | 0.22 | 6.4 × 10−1 |
| G2 | 1.36 a | 0.22 | ||
| G3 | 1.15 a | 0.19 | ||
| G4 | 1.39 a | 0.15 | ||
| T6 (151 days) | G1 | 1.46 a | 0.21 | 2.9 × 10−1 |
| G2 | 1.86 a | 0.11 | ||
| G3 | 1.69 a | 0.20 | ||
| G4 | 1.45 a | 0.14 |
* For each time point, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different by Tukey’s parametric test (p < 0.05).
Figure 1Mean value and percentage of serologically positive animals in the different groups (ELISA S/P value) for IgG anti-M. hyopneumoniae and prevalence of positive animals in nasal swab qPCR.
Weight at weaning (T1), at the end of nursery (T2), and at slaughter time (T3) for the four different groups.
| Points | Group | Mean * | Standard Error | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1 (weight at 25 days) | G1 | 6.20 b | 0.17 | 1 × 10−5 |
| G2 | 7.05 a | 0.14 | ||
| G3 | 6.01 b | 0.14 | ||
| G4 | 6.47 b | 0.14 | ||
| T2 (weight at 63 days) | G1 | 20.64 b | 0.42 | 7 × 10−6 |
| G2 | 22.42 a | 0.40 | ||
| G3 | 20.66 b | 0.48 | ||
| G4 | 23.35 a | 0.43 | ||
| T3 (G1, G2 and G3 weight at 151 days, G4 weight at 145 days) | G1 | 107.18 b | 1.50 | 8 × 10−5 |
| G2 | 113.33 a | 1.28 | ||
| G3 | 104.95 b | 1.47 | ||
| G4 | 103.42 b | 1.86 | ||
| T3 (G4 estimated weight at 151 days) | G1 | 107.18 ab | 1.50 | 8 × 10−3 |
| G2 | 113.33 a | 1.28 | ||
| G3 | 104.95 b | 1.47 | ||
| G4 | 108.29 ab | 2.34 |
* For each time point, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different by Tukey’s parametric test (p < 0.05).
Figure 2Weight histograms for G1, G2, G3 at 151 days and for G4 at 145 days of age.
Average daily weight gain (ADWG) of the four groups in the nursery, finishing phase, and weaning to slaughter phase.
| ADWG (kg) | Group | Mean * | Standard Error | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nursery | G1 | 0.39 b | 0.01 | 4 × 10−6 |
| G2 | 0.41 b | 0.01 | ||
| G3 | 0.39 b | 0.01 | ||
| G4 | 0.45 a | 0.01 | ||
| Finishing | G1 | 1.01 b | 0.01 | 3 × 10−3 |
| G2 | 1.07 a | 0.01 | ||
| G3 | 0.99 b | 0.01 | ||
| G4 | 1.01 b | 0.01 | ||
| Between 25d and 151d, considering the G4 up to 145d | G1 | 0.82 b | 0.01 | |
| G2 | 0.87 a | 0.01 | 1 × 10−2 | |
| G3 | 0.81 b | 0.01 | ||
| G4 | 0.84 ab | 0.01 |
* For each phase, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different by Tukey’s parametric test (p < 0.05).
Feed conversion of the four groups in the nursery, finishing, and weaning to slaughter phases.
| Food Conversion (FC) (kg) | Group | Mean * | Standard Error | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nursery | G1 | 2.01 a | 0.05 | 5 × 10−9 |
| G2 | 1.76 b | 0.05 | ||
| G3 | 2.11 a | 0.06 | ||
| G4 | 1.69 b | 0.04 | ||
| Finishing | G1 | 2.12 a | 0.03 | 4 × 10−2 |
| G2 | 2.02 b | 0.03 | ||
| G3 | 2.12 ab | 0.03 | ||
| G4 | 2.03 ab | 0.03 | ||
| Between 25d and 151d, considering the G4 up to 145d | G1 | 2.12 a | 0.03 | 3 × 10−4 |
| G2 | 1.97 b | 0.02 | ||
| G3 | 2.14 a | 0.03 | ||
| G4 | 1.97 b | 0.03 |
* For each phase, means followed by the same letter are not significantly different by Tukey’s parametric test (p < 0.05).
Mean quantification of M. hyopneumoniae DNA (copies/µL) in lung tissue at slaughter for the four different groups.
| Molecular Quantification of | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Mean * | Standard Error | |
| G1 | 1.34 × 105 a | 4.84 × 104 | 4 × 10−2 |
| G2 | 6.74 × 104 ab | 2.90 × 104 | |
| G3 | 3.15 × 104 b | 9.72 × 103 | |
| G4 | 2.41 × 104 b | 1.06 × 104 | |
* Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different by Tukey’s parametric test (p < 0.05).
Mean quantification of M. hyopneumoniae DNA (copies/µL) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid at slaughter in the four different groups.
| Molecular Quantification of | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Group | Mean * | Standard Error | |
| G1 | 2.32 × 106 a | 9.33 × 105 | 4 × 10−1 |
| G2 | 5.67 × 106 a | 2.23 × 106 | |
| G3 | 3.57 × 106 a | 1.05 × 106 | |
| G4 | 3.33 × 106 a | 9.55 × 105 | |
* Means followed by the same letter are not significantly different by Tukey’s parametric test (p < 0.05).
Figure 3Degrees of injury among groups in the histopathological analysis. In the figure, individual values of each of the observations were represented as dots for G1, triangles for G2, squares for G3 and crosses for G4.
Figure 4Schematics of medication protocols used in animals from G1 to G4.