| Literature DB >> 35883873 |
Mona Gruenwald1,2, Fangfang Chen2,3, Heike Bähre4, Frank Pessler2,3.
Abstract
The naturally occurring isomers itaconate, mesaconate and citraconate possess immunomodulatory, antioxidative and antimicrobial properties. However, it is not known whether they occur in commonly consumed human foods. Considering that they can arise as a result of heat conversion, we tested whether they occur in bread, representing a commonly consumed baked good. Using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, we measured concentrations of the three isomers and their potential precursors, citrate and cis-aconitate, in unbaked sourdough and dough, and in crumb and crust of baked bread. All three isomers were detected at low concentrations (<20 pmol/mg dry weight) in sourdough, dough, crumb and crust. Concentrations of itaconate and citraconate were substantially higher in crust than in crumb of wheat and rye bread, and a modest increase in mesaconate was observed in crust of rye bread. In contrast, cis-aconitate concentrations were considerably lower in crust, which was consistent with the conversion of cis-aconitate to itaconate isomers due to higher temperature of the dough surface during baking. Based on data on the average consumption of bread and related baked goods in Germany, the daily intake of itaconate isomers was estimated to be roughly 7-20 µg. Thus, baked goods constitute a regular dietary source of low amounts of itaconate isomers. In order to enable studies on the impact of dietary intake of itaconate isomers on human health, their concentrations should be assessed in other foods that are subjected to high heating.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidants; baking; citraconic acid; dicarboxylic acids; diet; food; itaconic acid; mesaconic acid; nutrients; nutrition
Year: 2022 PMID: 35883873 PMCID: PMC9312323 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11071382
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Figure 1Structures of itaconic, mesaconic and citraconic acids. The isomers differ only by the arrangement of the internal double bond (marked blue), which is an important determinant of electrophilicity and antioxidative potential.
Figure 2Comparison of analyte concentrations (pmol/mg dry weight) in crumb and crust of commercial wheat and rye bread (A–E) and in sourdough, dough, crumb and crust of homemade whole-grain wheat and rye bread (F–J). The data are a pool of three independent experiments, each comprising 3 non-technical replicates (individual sample aliquots) per sample, i.e., 9 data points per bar. Two-way ANOVA with Tukey test for multiple testing. * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.001, **** p ≤ 0.0001.
Figure 3Crust vs. crumb: comparison of moles of itaconate isomers in crust gained vs. moles of cis-aconitate in crust lost. The difference in cis-aconitate concentration (moles/mg dry weight) between crust and crumb was subtracted from the difference in concentration of itaconate isomers (sum of the 3 isomers) between crust and crumb. A positive value indicates that the gain in itaconate isomers concentration is larger than the loss of cis-aconitate concentration. Based on the same data underlying Figure 2.
Comparison of calculated amounts of all analytes per slice of bread (g × 10−6 ± SD).
| Bread Type | Itaconate | Citraconate | Mesaconate | Citrate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wheat | Commercial | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 2.7 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.04 | 96.0 ± 6.6 | 15.0 ± 0.2 |
| Homemade | 3.4 ± 0.3 | 3.7 ± 1.0 | 0.3 ± 0.4 | 14.0 ± 7.2 | 46.4 ± 4.3 | |
| Rye | Commercial | 2.8 ± 0.2 | 4.8 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 72.0 ± 4.0 | 26.7 ± 0.6 |
| Homemade | 2.7 ± 0.6 | 3.1 ± 0.5 | 4.1 ± 2.4 | 83.0 ± 53.6 | 86.9 ± 8.5 | |
Estimated daily intake of itaconate isomers in bread.
| Estimated Mean Intake (Adult/Day) g × 10−6 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference | Average Bread Intake | Itaconate | Citraconate | Mesaconate | All |
| [ | 45.3 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 1.8 | 7.0 |
| [ | 134.5 c | 6.2 | 8.6 | 3.9 | 19 |
a EPIC Potsdam: whole-grain bread. b German National Nutrition Survey II: bread and related baked goods. Mean of intake by men and women (in g).
Citrate and cis-aconitate concentrations in wheat seedlings (pmol/mg wet weight) a.
| Citrate | ||
|---|---|---|
| Seed leaves | 477 ± 187 | 189 ± 21 |
| Mature leaves | 202 ± 61 | 218 ± 7 |
an = 3 samples of each leaf type. Mean ± SD.