| Literature DB >> 35883735 |
Cristina Moliner1, Guillermo Cásedas1,2, Lillian Barros3, Tiane C Finimundy3, Carlota Gómez-Rincón1,2, Víctor López1,2.
Abstract
The flowers of Borago officinalis L. (Boraginaceae), commonly known as borage, are widely used as a culinary ingredient. The aim of this study was to assess the potential benefits of fresh borage flower extract related to antioxidant, neuroprotective and anti-aging properties. The extract was obtained by Soxhlet extraction with ethanol as a solvent, and fatty acids were detected by GC-FID. The antioxidant activity was evaluated in vitro through the DPPH, FRAP and ORAC assays. Regarding the fatty acid (FA) composition, the extract showed high amounts of polyunsaturated FA. The Neuro-2a cell line was used to determine the cytoprotective capacity of the extract subjected to oxidative stress (H2O2). Moreover, the model organism Caenorhabditis elegans was used to assess antioxidant activity, delayed ageing as well as cytoprotection and reduced β-amyloid toxicity. Cells treated with the extract and H2O2 showed a better response to oxidative stress than the control group, particularly in terms of mitochondrial activity (MTT assay), redox state (ROS formation) and the activity of antioxidant enzymes (catalase and superoxide dismutase). B. officinalis flower extract showed promising antioxidant activity in the selected models, without causing toxicity. Hence, the results obtained support the antioxidant properties of borage flowers in different bioassays using living organisms.Entities:
Keywords: Borago officinalis; C. elegans; Neuro-2a; PUFA; antioxidant; functional foods; neuroprotection
Year: 2022 PMID: 35883735 PMCID: PMC9312273 DOI: 10.3390/antiox11071244
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antioxidants (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3921
Fatty acid composition of B. officinalis flower extract.
| Fatty Acids | Shorthand Nomenclature | Relative Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Caproic acid | 6:0 | 0.24 ± 0.04 |
| Caprylic acid | 8:0 | 0.0802 ± 0.0001 |
| Capric acid | 10:0 | 0.041 ± 0.003 |
| Docosanoic acid | 22:0 | 1.39 ± 0.001 |
| Dodecanoic acid | 12:0 | 0.114 ± 0.002 |
| Heptadecanoic acid | 17:0 | 0.48 ± 0.01 |
| Lignoceric acid | 24:0 | 0.732 ± 0.001 |
| Myristic acid | 14:0 | 0.45 ± 0.04 |
| Pentadecanoic acid | 15:0 | 2.48 ± 0.03 |
| Palmitic acid | 16:0 | 17.17 ± 0.04 |
| Stearic acid | 18:0 | 3.8 ± 0.1 |
| Tricosylic acid | 23:0 | 0.32 ± 0.01 |
| Eicosenoic acid | 20:1 | 0.49 ± 0.02 |
| Erucic acid | 22:1 ω 9 | 0.16 ± 0.01 |
| Myristoleic acid | 14:1 | 0.24 ± 0.01 |
| Nervonic acid | 24:1 | 1.05 ± 0.01 |
| Oleic acid | 18:1 ω 9 | 15.93 ± 0.04 |
| Palmitoleic acid | 16:1 | 0.19 ± 0.01 |
| Eicosadienoic acid | 20:2 | 0.42 ± 0.04 |
| Eicosatrienoic acid | 20:3 ω 3 + 21:0 | 0.276 ± 0.004 |
| Eicosapentaenoic acid | 20:5 ω 3 | 0.12 ± 0.01 |
| γ-Linolenic acid | 18:3 ω 6 | 0.13 ± 0.01 |
| α-Linolenic acid | 18:3 ω 3 | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
| Linoleic acid | 18:2 ω 6 | 53.7 ± 0.2 |
| Σ Saturated fatty acids (SFA) | 27.27 | |
| Σ Monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) | 18.05 | |
| Σ Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) | 54.68 | |
| Σ ω 6 | 53.83 | |
| Σ ω 3 | 0.59 | |
| Cox value | 5.73 | |
| Atherogenicity Index ( | 0.26 | |
Antioxidant activity of B. officinalis flower extract. The results are presented as mean ± SEM.
| DPPH | FRAP | ORAC | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 646 ± 35 | 4 ± 2 | 0.54 ± 0.03 |
Abbreviation: TE = Trolox equivalent.
Figure 1Mitochondrial activity in Neuro-2a cell culture (MTT assay). Cytoprotective effects of Borago officinalis flower extract versus hydrogen peroxide (300 µM). Note: * p < 0.05 versus H2O2; ** p < 0.01 versus H2O2; *** p < 0.005 versus H2O2; ### p < 0.0005 versus control.
Figure 2Production of ROS in Neuro-2a cells treated with hydrogen peroxide and Borago officinalis flower extract (15.62–250 µg/mL). Data are expressed as percentage over control cells. Note: # p < 0.05 versus control; ## p < 0.01 versus control; ### p < 0.0005 versus control; #### p < 0.0001 versus control; ns: no significant; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01. Borage co-treatment did not show any difference until 40 min (125 µg/mL; p < 0.05). From this point, ROS species were diminishing for all extract treatments and significant differences were increased. At the end of the experiment, only 15.62 µg/mL did not achieve any significant differences. Borago officinalis flower extract (125 µg/mL) reduced ROS production almost to basal levels (control cells).
Figure 3Neuro-2a endogenous antioxidant enzymes exerted by Borago officinalis flower extract treatments (15.62-250 µg/mL). (A) Catalase activity. (B) Superoxide dismutase activity. Note: * p < 0.05 versus H2O2; # p < 0.05 versus control; ## p < 0.01 versus control.
Figure 4Effect of B. officinalis flower extract on the response to lethal oxidative stress induced by juglone (150 μM) on C. elegans N2. Differences compared to control group were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05 (*) and p ≤ 0.0001 (****).
Figure 5Lifespan of C. elegans SS104 subjected to Borago officinalis flower extract. The mean lifespan was 14 days in control group and 17 days for all treatment groups. Result were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier survival model and for significance by using a log-rank pairwise comparison test between the control and treatment groups.
Figure 6Effect of B. officinalis flower extract on Aβ-induced paralysis on transgenic C. elegans CL4176. The PT50 were 48 h for the control group and 72 h for 50 and 100 µg/mL treated group. The PT50 was not achieved in the group treated with 250 µg/mL. Statistical significance of the difference between the experiments was analyzed by a log-rank (Kaplan–Meier) statistical test, which compared the survival distributions between the control and treated groups. Differences in survival tests between treatment and the control group were p ≤ 0.0001.