| Literature DB >> 35883494 |
Tingting Li1,2, Na Pang2,3, Lian He4, Yuan Xu3, Xinyu Fu5, Yinjie Tang4, Yair Shachar-Hill3, Shulin Chen2.
Abstract
The microalga Chlorella sorokiniana has attracted much attention for lipid production and wastewater treatment. It can perform photosynthesis and organic carbon utilization concurrently. To understand its phototrophic metabolism, a biomass compositional analysis, a 13C metabolic flux analysis, and metabolite pool size analyses were performed. Under dark condition, the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (OPP) was the major route for glucose catabolism (88% carbon flux) and a cyclic OPP-glycolytic route for glucose catabolism was formed. Under light condition, fluxes in the glucose catabolism, tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, and anaplerotic reaction (CO2 fixation via phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase) were all suppressed. Meanwhile, the RuBisCO reaction became active and the ratio of its carbon fixation to glucose carbon utilization was determined as 7:100. Moreover, light condition significantly reduced the pool sizes of sugar phosphate metabolites (such as E4P, F6P, and S7P) and promoted biomass synthesis (which reached 0.155 h-1). In addition, light condition increased glucose consumption rates, leading to higher ATP and NADPH production and a higher protein content (43% vs. 30%) in the biomass during the exponential growth phase.Entities:
Keywords: 13C-MFA; Chlorella sorokiniana; heterotrophic; microalgae; mixotrophic; pool size
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35883494 PMCID: PMC9313030 DOI: 10.3390/biom12070939
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1The growth of C. sorokiniana in batch cultures supplied with glucose under aerobic conditions. The cultures were grown mixotrophically (●) and heterotrophically (○). The arrows indicate the time points of sampling for the isotopic labeling patterns of proteinogenic amino acids. (A) The growth curves of C. sorokiniana under mixotrophic and heterotrophic conditions; (B) Glucose levels in mixotrophic and heterotrophic cultures; (C) Nitrogen consumption()n in mixotrophic and heterotrophic cultures. The error bars represent the standard deviations for the biological triplicates.
Figure 2The biomass composition and FAMEs profile of C. sorokiniana when cultured mixotrophically and heterotrophically. (A) Biomass composition; (B) FAMEs profile. M-M, mid-exponential phase in mixotrophy; M-L, late exponential phase in mixotrophy; H-M, mid-exponential phase in heterotrophy; H-L, late exponential phase in heterotrophy.
Figure 3Flux distribution in the central metabolism of C. sorokiniana. (A) Heterotrophically cultured C. sorokiniana cells; (B) mixotrophically cultured C. sorokiniana cells. All estimated relative flux rates are shown next to the pathways, which are normalized to the glucose uptake rate. The standard deviation of each flux is shown, which was calculated based on the 95% confidence intervals (Supplementary Materials, File S3). The solid arrows represent the directions of the net fluxes and the wider arrows show higher flux rates. The open arrows represent the fluxes to the biomass.
Figure 4The relative pool size of C. sorokiniana normalized to E. coli K-12 under mixotrophic (M) and heterotrophic (H) conditions. A ratio of 1 indicates the same metabolite concentrations (normalized to gram biomass) in C. sorokiniana and E. coli.
Figure 5Changes in the fatty acids of C. sorokiniana at different growth phases under mixotrophic and heterotrophic conditions. Fatty acids were analyzed from this and a previous study: (A) mixotrophic cells at the exponential phase (this study); (B) heterotrophic cells at the exponential phase (this study); (C) mixotrophic cells at the stationary phase (Li et al., 2014); (D) heterotrophic cells at the stationary phase (Li et al., 2014).
A comparison of the energy molecule production and consumption from different pathways.
| M | H | M | H | M | H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pathway | ATP | NADH | NADPH | |||
| Glycolysis | −4 | 4 | 37 | 112 | n/a | n/a |
| TCA Cycle | 7 | 30 | 113 | 167 | n/a | n/a |
| OPP/Calvin Cycle | −42 | 0 | n/a | n/a | 61 | 175 |
| Anaplerotic Pathway | n/a | n/a | n/a | n/a | 5 | 16 |
| Biomass | −382 | −274 | 28 | 20 | −284 | −191 |
| Overall Balance | −421 | −240 | 178 | 298 | −219 | 0 |
Note: all values are normalized to a glucose uptake rate of 100 mol h−1 in both mixotrophic cells (M) and heterotrophic cells (H).