| Literature DB >> 35883363 |
Jiandong Yang1, Samuel Kumi Okyere2, Jie Zheng3, Buyuan Cao2, Yanchun Hu2.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to elucidate the prevalence of intestinal parasites in macaques at the Mt. Emei Scenic Area of Sichuan, China. A total of 168 fecal samples were collected from yellow (n = 31), black (n = 19), new (n = 57), Leidongping (n = 57) and Wuxiangang (n = 4) macaques from 2019 to 2020. The fecal samples were tested for various gastrointestinal parasites following the microscopic detection method. The results showed that the total prevalence rate of the intestinal parasite was 51.19% (86/168), whereas the intestinal parasite with the highest prevalence was Gongylonema spp. (26.79%) for helminth and Entamoeba spp. (18.45%) for protozoa. Interestingly, the highest prevalence of intestinal parasites was observed during the summer season (86.21%), and the lowest was observed during the winter season (7.14%). There was a positive correlation observed between the human contact frequency and total prevalence rate of the intestinal parasites (p < 0.05); however, there was no correlation between the human contact frequency and total prevalence of the intestinal parasites at different seasons (p > 0.05). In conclusion, the dominant parasites Gongylonema spp. and Entamoeba spp. cause various diseases that may be transmitted to humans and other animals; therefore, there is a need for a proper management system, such as parasite control measures and population protection in the Mt. Emei Scenic Area of Sichuan, China.Entities:
Keywords: Entamoeba spp.; Gongylonema spp.; macaque; parasite; prevalence rate
Year: 2022 PMID: 35883363 PMCID: PMC9311871 DOI: 10.3390/ani12141816
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Figure 1This map shows the summary of the study area (Emei Mountain scenic spot) and the geographical distribution of macaques: (1) yellow macaques group; (2) black macaques group; (3) new macaques group; (4) Leidongping macaques group; (5) Wuxiangang macaques group.
Population of monkeys during the four seasons.
| Population | Yellow Macaque Group in the Ecological Area | Black Macaque Group in the Ecological Area | New Macaque in the Ecological Area | Leidongping Macaque | Wuxiangang Macaque | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spring | 9 | 4 | 7 | 9 | 2 | 31 |
| Summer | 14 | 9 | 16 | 17 | 2 | 58 |
| Autumn | 5 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 0 | 23 |
| Winter | 3 | 3 | 28 | 22 | 0 | 56 |
| Total | 31 | 19 | 57 | 57 | 4 | 168 |
Contact frequency of different groups of macaques with humans.
| Monkeys | Number of Samples | Haunt Time Every Day | Haunt Location | Daily Exposure Time | Contact Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yellow macaque | 31 | 2.6 | Near Qingyin Pavilion | 16.1 | 6.2 |
| Black macaque | 19 | 2.9 | Suspension bridge in ecological area | 16.4 | 5.7 |
| New macaque | 57 | 3.2 | Sandaoqiao, suspension bridge in ecological area | 14.1 | 4.4 |
| Leidongping macaque | 57 | 6.1 | Leidongping stand | 19.5 | 3.2 |
| Wuxiangang macaque | 4 | 0.6 | Wuxiangang station | 0.3 | 0.5 |
Total prevalence rate of the intestinal parasites in macaques.
| Population | Yellow Macaque Group in the Ecological Area ( | Black Macaque Group in the Ecological Area | New Macaque in the Ecological Area ( | Leidongping | Wuxiangang | Total | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parasites | DN | PR | DN | PR | DN | PR | DN | PR | DN | PR | DN | PR |
|
| 2 | 6.45 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3.51 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.19 |
| 12 | 38.71 | 7 | 36.84 | 5 | 8.77 | 7 | 12.28 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 18.45 | |
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 5.26 | 3 | 5.26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2.98 | |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.75 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.60 |
| Trematoda spp. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5.26 | 2 | 3.51 | 1 | 1.75 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2.38 |
| Cestoda spp. | 5 | 16.13 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.75 | 2 | 3.51 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 4.17 |
| 13 | 41.94 | 12 | 63.16 | 6 | 10.56 | 13 | 22.81 | 1 | 25 | 45 | 26.79 | |
|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 5.26 | 3 | 5.26 | 2 | 3.51 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3.57 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.75 | 2 | 3.51 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1.79 | |
|
| 1 | 3.23 | 1 | 5.26 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.19 |
|
| 8 | 25.81 | 1 | 5.26 | 7 | 12.28 | 5 | 8.77 | 1 | 25 | 24 | 14.29 |
| Total | 25 | 80.65 | 17 | 89.47 | 20 | 35.09 | 23 | 40.35 | 1 | 25 | 86 | 51.19 |
DN—Detection number, PR—Prevalence rate.
Figure 2Gastrointestinal parasite presents in fecal samples of macaques. (a) Ascaris eggs; (b) trematoda eggs; (c) enterobius eggs; (d) physaloptera eggs; (e) ancylostoma duodenale eggs spp.; (f) cestoda egg.
Figure 3Correlation between the contact frequency and total intestinal parasite prevalence rate.
Prevalence of intestinal parasites during different seasons.
| Season/Population | Spring ( | Summer ( | Autumn ( | Winter ( | Total ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DN | PR | DN | PR | DN | PR | DN | PR | DN | PR | |
|
| 1 | 3.23 | 1 | 1.72 | 1 | 4.35 | 1 | 1.79 | 4 | 2.38 |
| 0 | 0 | 31 | 53.45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 31 | 18.45 | |
| 0 | 0 | 4 | 6.90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2.38 | |
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4.35 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0.60 |
| Trematoda spp. | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1.72 | 3 | 13.04 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4.76 |
| Cestoda spp. | 1 | 3.23 | 4 | 6.90 | 3 | 13.04 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 4.17 |
| 15 | 48.38 | 18 | 31.03 | 9 | 39.13 | 3 | 5.36 | 45 | 26.79 | |
|
| 0 | 0 | 5 | 8.62 | 1 | 4.35 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 3.57 |
| 0 | 0 | 3 | 5.17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1.79 | |
|
| 1 | 3.23 | 1 | 1.72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1.19 |
|
| 4 | 12.90 | 16 | 27.59 | 2 | 8.70 | 0 | 0 | 22 | 13.10 |
| Total | 19 | 61.29 | 50 | 86.21 | 13 | 56.52 | 4 | 7.14 | 86 | 51.19 |
DN—Detection number, PR—prevalence rate.
Figure 4Correlation between the contact frequency and seasonal intestinal parasite prevalence.