| Literature DB >> 35883323 |
Magdalena Senderska-Płonowska1, Natalia Siwińska2, Agnieszka Zak-Bochenek1, Marta Rykała2, Malwina Słowikowska2, Jan P Madej1, Katarzyna Kaleta-Kuratewicz3, Artur Niedźwiedź2.
Abstract
Obesity is a common problem in horses. The associations between obesity and equine metabolic syndrome (EMS) and between EMS and laminitis are known. However, there is a lack of data on whether obesity itself can affect hoof lamellae. Forelimbs and blood from 12 draft horses (six obese and six lean) from a slaughterhouse were acquired. To exclude laminitis and EMS horses, insulin concentration was measured, and hooves were radiographed. Histological evaluation was performed. The shape of the primary and secondary epidermal lamellae (PEL and SEL) was evaluated, and the length of the keratinized and total primary epidermal lamellae was measured (KPEL and TEL). All horses showed pathological changes in lamellae. In the lean group, the changes were longer SELs, more proliferated and separated PDLs, and less standard PDLs. In the obese group, the changes were a lower number of club-shaped and standard SELs and significantly more tapered SELs. No difference in the shape of PELs and the length of KPELs was noticed. The research did not confirm the effects of obesity on lamellar failure. The measurements taken indicate that the lamellae are much longer compared to other research studies; this could indicate that the length of the PEL depends on the hoof size.Entities:
Keywords: draft horses; equine metabolic syndrome; horses; laminitis; obesity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35883323 PMCID: PMC9311632 DOI: 10.3390/ani12141774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 3.231
Figure 1Mean length (±SD) of primary epidermal lamellae (PEL) and keratinized epidermal lamellae (KPEL) in the hooves of lean and obese horses. The difference in PEL length between groups is significant (p < 0.001).
Shapes of PELs.
| Shape of PEL | Groups |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lean | Obese | ||
| Standard | 15% (9) | 5.4% (3) | 0.088 |
| Tapered | 58.3% (35) | 60.7% (34) | 0.794 |
| Sharp | 26.7% (16) | 33.9% (19) | 0.394 |
| Bifurcated 1 | 0% (0) | 1.8% (1) | 0.482 |
1 Since bifurcation could happen in standard, tapered, or sharp shape, it is shown separately. The number of lamellae is shown in brackets.
Figure 2Images show PELs in examined horses. PELs did not differ between groups: (A)—sharp PELs in obese horse; (B)—sharp PELs in lean horse; (C)—standard PELs in obese horse; (D)—standard PELs in lean horse. Scale bar = 200 μm.
Shapes of PDLs.
| Shape of PDL ( | Groups | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lean | Obese |
| |
| Standard |
|
|
|
| Sharp | 1.7% (1) | 0% (0) | 0.522 |
| Proliferative |
|
|
|
| Separated |
|
|
|
| Keratinized | 3.3% (2) | 8.8% (5) | 0.215 |
| Bifurcated | 3.3% (2) | 1.7% (1) | 0.589 |
The number of lamellae is shown in brackets. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were bolded.
Figure 3Images show PDLs in examined horses. (A)—separated (lean); (B)—proliferative (lean); (C)—standard (obese); (D)—keratinized (obese). Scale bar = 200 μm.
Shapes of SELs in examined groups of horses.
| Shape of SEL | Groups/localization | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lean | Obese | |||||
| Axial | Middle | Abaxial | Axial | Middle | Abaxial | |
| Standard |
|
| 3.3% (2) |
|
| 0% (0) |
|
|
|
| 0.247 | |||
| Tapered |
| 41.7% (25) | 56.6% (34) |
| 58.3% (35) | 65% (39) |
|
|
| 0.067 | 0.349 | |||
| Club-shaped | 11.7% (7) |
| 0% (0) | 5% (3) |
| 0% (0) |
| 0.186 |
| - | ||||
| Suprabasal layer hyperplasia | 16.7% (10) | 10% (6) |
| 13.2% (8) | 3.3% (2) |
|
|
| 0.609 | 0.143 | 0.0001 | |||
| Fused | 13.2% (8) | 5% (3) |
| 21.7% (13) | 5% (3) |
|
|
| 0.229 | 1.000 |
| |||
| Separated | 16.7% (10) |
|
| 16.7% (10) |
| 25% (15) |
|
| 1.000 |
| 0.122 | |||
| Keratinized | 0% (0) | 0% (0) | 1.7% (1) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) | 0% (0) |
|
| - | - | 0.504 | |||
| Bifurcated | 1.7% (1) | 0% (0) | 1.7% (1) | 1.7% (1) | 0% (0) | 1.7% (1) |
|
| 1.000 | - | 1.000 | |||
A comparison was made between the same part of lamellae. The number of lamellae is shown in brackets. Significant differences (p < 0.05) are bolded.
Figure 4Types of SELs noted in the study: (A)—suprabasal layer hyperplasia (lean); (B)—tapered (lean); (C)—tapering and suprabasal layer hyperplasia (obese); (D)—fused and standard (lean); (E)—separated (lean); (F)—tapered (obese). Scale bar = 100 μm.