| Literature DB >> 35883031 |
Ruyi Zhang1, Zhiying Zhang1, Yingchun Peng2, Shaoqi Zhai1, Jiaojiao Zhou3, Jingjing Chen4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Currently, population aging has been an obstacle and the spotlight for all countries. Compared with developed countries, problems caused by China's aging population are more prominent. Beijing, as a typical example, is characterized by advanced age and high disability rate, making this capital city scramble to take control of this severe problem. The main types of care for the disabled elderly are classified as home care, institutional care, and community care. With the obvious shortage of senior care institutions, most disabled elderly people are prone to choose home care. This kind of elderly care model is in line with the traditional Chinese concept and it can save the social cost of the disabled elderly to the greatest extent. However, home care for the disabled elderly is facing bumps from the whole society, such as lack of professional medical care, social support and humanistic care, and the care resources provided by a single subject cannot meet the needs of the disabled elderly.Entities:
Keywords: Disability; Elderly; Home care; Multiple subjects; Qualitative research
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35883031 PMCID: PMC9327313 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-022-01777-w
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Prim Care ISSN: 2731-4553
Demographic characteristics of the disabled elderly
| Items | Number of interviewees (%) |
|---|---|
| Rural area | 55 (46.6) |
| Urban area | 63 (53.4) |
| Male | 59 (50.0) |
| Female | 59 (50.0) |
| 60 ~ | 18 (15.3) |
| 70 ~ | 26 (22.0) |
| 80 ~ | 44 (37.3) |
| 90 ~ | 30 (25.4) |
| Elementary school or below | 49 (41.5) |
| Secondary school | 44 (37.3) |
| Junior college | 18 (15.3) |
| University or above | 7 (5.9) |
| Mild disability | 12 (10.2) |
| Moderate disability | 20 (16.9) |
| Severe disability | 86 (72.9) |
| < 1 | 24 (20.3) |
| 1 ~ | 79 (66.9) |
| 10 ~ | 15 (12.7) |
| Not have | 13 (11.0) |
| Have | 105 (89.0) |
| Medical insurance for urban and rural residents | 76 (64.4) |
| Urban employee medical insurance | 36 (30.5) |
| Low-budget medical assistance | 1 (0.8) |
| Public medical | 5 (4.2) |
| 118 (100) | |
The main reasons resulting in the disability
| The main reasons | Number of interviewees(%) |
|---|---|
| Old age | 11 (9.3) |
| Cerebral infarction | 36 (30.5) |
| Myocardial infarction | 7 (5.9) |
| Malignant tumor | 9 (7.6) |
| Other diseases | 43 (36.4) |
| External force damage | 12 (10.2) |
| Total | 118 (100.0) |
The primary caregiver of the disabled elderly in home
| Primary caregiver | Number of interviewees(%) |
|---|---|
| Wife or husband | 42 (35.6) |
| Son | 18 (15.3) |
| Daughter | 12 (10.2) |
| Daughter-in-law | 13 (11.0) |
| Son-in-law | 1 (0.8) |
| Nanny | 21 (17.8) |
| Other relatives | 5 (4.2) |
| No fixed caregiver (children’s shift) | 6 (5.1) |
| Total | 118 (100.0) |
The analysis process of the different subjects from the interviews
| Subject | Code | Category | Subcategory |
|---|---|---|---|
| Government | G1 | Subsidy | Financial support, allowance, money |
| G2 | Service | Volunteer service, mutual aid services | |
| G3 | Standard | Service content, service standards | |
| G4 | Policy | Disability assessment, laws, regulations | |
| G5 | Consideration | Care, spiritual concern | |
| Family Doctor | D1 | Basic service | Medical service scope, basic medical care |
| D2 | Education | Health education, health messages | |
| D3 | Personal service | Family hospital beds, door-to-door service | |
| D4 | Concern | Care, concern, release stress | |
| D5 | Convenience | Green channel, convenience | |
| Family Member | M1 | Financial support | Financial support, money, economic |
| M2 | Company | Care, company, psychological concern | |
| M3 | Patience | Patience, careful, kind | |
| M4 | Skill | Knowledge, professional skill | |
| Society | S1 | Free service | Voluntary service, free service |
| S2 | Respect | Harmony, respect, approve | |
| S3 | Paid service | Professional platform, nanny | |
| S4 | Community help | Neighborhood help, community mutual aid, committee care | |
| S5 | Financial aid | Financial, money | |
| The Elderly | E1 | Disability | Incapable, no responsibility |
| E2 | Behavior | Receive advice, adopt behaviors | |
| E3 | Attitude | Kind, nice, temper less |
Fig. 1Schematic diagram of the relationships among multiple subjects which involved in the service supply process of home care for the disabled elderly. Note a: The dotted line represents that the subjects have not yet formed a close cooperative relationship
The functions of multiple subjects in home care of the disabled elderly
| Subject | Government | Family Doctor | Family Member | Society | The Disabled Elderly | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-profit, Organization | For-profit, Market | |||||
| Role | Supplier, Policymaker; Supervisor | Supplier | Supplier, Consumer, Supervisor | Supplier, Supervisor | Supplier | Supplier, Consumer, Supervisor |
| Motivation | Government, Responsibility, Public Interests | Duty, Responsibility | Responsibility, Family Interests | Spontaneity, Public, Interests | Profit | Independence, Health Rights |
| Aim | Promote Health Equity | Protect Health | Maximize Self-utility | Maximize Social Benefits | Maximize Benefits | Maximize Self-Health Rights |
| Mechanism | Bureaucracy | Job duty | Family Mutual Aid | Voluntary | Market | Autonomous Participation |
| Advantage | Authoritative Guidance | Professional Assistance | Emotional, Support | Free Supplement | Diversified Services | Proactive Cooperation |
| Disadvantage | Government Dysfunction | Low Responsibility | Weak Support | Voluntary Dysfunction | Market Dysfunction | Capability Limitations |
Fig. 2A collaborative framework of multiple subjects involved in home care for the disabled elderly