Literature DB >> 35882902

Protecting infrastructure performance from disinformation attacks.

Saeed Jamalzadeh1, Kash Barker2, Andrés D González1, Sridhar Radhakrishnan3.   

Abstract

Disinformation campaigns are prevalent, affecting vaccination coverage, creating uncertainty in election results, and causing supply chain disruptions, among others. Unfortunately, the problems of misinformation and disinformation are exacerbated due to the wide availability of online platforms and social networks. Naturally, these emerging disinformation networks could lead users to engage with critical infrastructure systems in harmful ways, leading to broader adverse impacts. One such example involves the spread of false pricing information, which causes drastic and sudden changes in user commodity consumption behavior, leading to shortages. Given this, it is critical to address the following related questions: (i) How can we monitor the evolution of disinformation dissemination and its projected impacts on commodity consumption? (ii) What effects do the mitigation efforts of human intermediaries have on the performance of the infrastructure network subject to disinformation campaigns? (iii) How can we manage infrastructure network operations and counter disinformation in concert to avoid shortages and satisfy user demands? To answer these questions, we develop a hybrid approach that integrates an epidemiological model of disinformation spread (based on a susceptible-infectious-recovered model, or SIR) with an efficient mixed-integer programming optimization model for infrastructure network performance. The goal of the optimization model is to determine the best protection and response actions against disinformation to minimize the general shortage of commodities at different nodes over time. The proposed model is illustrated with a case study involving a subset of the western US interconnection grid located in Los Angeles County in California.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35882902      PMCID: PMC9325778          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16832-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  8 in total

Review 1.  Networks and epidemic models.

Authors:  Matt J Keeling; Ken T D Eames
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Evaluating and Visualizing the Economic Impact of Commercial Districts Due to an Electric Power Network Disruption.

Authors:  Andrea Garcia Tapia; Mildred Suarez; Jose E Ramirez-Marquez; Kash Barker
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 4.000

3.  Measuring the news and its impact on democracy.

Authors:  Duncan J Watts; David M Rothschild; Markus Mobius
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Traffic networks are vulnerable to disinformation attacks.

Authors:  Marcin Waniek; Gururaghav Raman; Bedoor AlShebli; Jimmy Chih-Hsien Peng; Talal Rahwan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The spread of true and false news online.

Authors:  Soroush Vosoughi; Deb Roy; Sinan Aral
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Immunization against the Spread of Rumors in Homogenous Networks.

Authors:  Laijun Zhao; Jiajia Wang; Rongbing Huang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Epidemic model for information diffusion in web forums: experiments in marketing exchange and political dialog.

Authors:  Jiyoung Woo; Hsinchun Chen
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-01-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.