| Literature DB >> 35881173 |
Carla Harkin1, Karl W Smith2,3, C Logan MacKay4, Tara Moore5, Simon Brockbank6, Mark Ruddock6, Diego F Cobice7.
Abstract
Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is the leading cause of end-stage renal disease. Limitations in current diagnosis and screening methods have sparked a search for more specific and conclusive biomarkers. Hyperglycemic conditions generate a plethora of harmful molecules in circulation and within tissues. Oxidative stress generates reactive α-dicarbonyls and β-unsaturated hydroxyhexenals, which react with proteins to form advanced glycation end products. Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) enables the detection and spatial localization of molecules in biological tissue sections. Here, for the first time, the localization and semiquantitative analysis of "reactive aldehydes" (RAs) 4-hydroxyhexenal (4-HHE), 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE), and 4-oxo-2-nonenal (4-ONE) in the kidney tissues of a diabetic mouse model is presented. Ionization efficiency was enhanced through on-tissue chemical derivatization (OTCD) using Girard's reagent T (GT), forming positively charged hydrazone derivatives. MSI analysis was performed using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) coupled with Fourier-transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR). RA levels were elevated in diabetic kidney tissues compared to lean controls and localized throughout the kidney sections at a spatial resolution of 100 µm. This was confirmed by liquid extraction surface analysis-MSI (LESA-MSI) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). This method identified β-unsaturated aldehydes as "potential" biomarkers of DN and demonstrated the capability of OTCD-MSI for detection and localization of poorly ionizable molecules by adapting existing chemical derivatization methods. Untargeted exploratory distribution analysis of some precursor lipids was also assessed using MALDI-FT-ICR-MSI.Entities:
Keywords: Diabetic nephropathy; Mass spectrometry imaging; Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization; On-tissue chemical derivatization; Reactive aldehydes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35881173 PMCID: PMC9411223 DOI: 10.1007/s00216-022-04229-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Anal Bioanal Chem ISSN: 1618-2642 Impact factor: 4.478
Fig. 1MSI workflow denoting sample preparation for analysis of reactive aldehydes using LESA-MSI and MALDI-FT-ICR-MSI (green arrows) and untargeted lipid analysis using MALDI-FT-ICR-MSI (red arrows)
Fig. 2a Representative optical, MSI and H&E-stained (adjacent section) images from control (n = 6) (left) and diabetic time points (TP) (right) (n = 6/per TP). Rows top-down, MSI images obtained for 4-hydroxyhexenal (4-HHE) derivative (m/z 228.17035 ± 0.0014 Da), 4-oxo-2-nonenal (4-ONE) derivative (m/z 268.20169 ± 0.0014 Da), and 4-hydroxynonenal (4-HNE) derivative (m/z 270.21708 ± 0.0014 Da). Data normalized by root mean square (RMS) and calibrated using a CHCA peak (m/z 417.04830) and ISTD (p-anisaldehyde) at m/z 266.14991. b Data obtained from MALDI-FT-ICR-MSI experiment with control and diabetic tissues for RAs: normality of the data distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and through inspection of histograms and Q-Q plots. Normally distributed data followed parametric testing (analysis of variance (ANOVA)) and results were expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined from a p value of < 0.05 (*), p value of < 0.01 (**), and p value of < 0.001 (***). Analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 25) (SPSS, IBM Analytics, New York, USA). c Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained kidney Sects. (8 µm). Rows: top, diabetic kidney sections (db/db), bottom, control kidney sections. Columns (l-r) TP1 = time point 1, TP2 = time point 2, TP3 = time point 3. Yellow arrows indicate possible carbonylated by-product deposition observed in diabetic tissues. Bottom, panel, MSI images of 4HNE at higher spatial resolution (45 μm)
Mass accuracies (ppm) obtained from representative slides analyzed using MALDI-FT-ICR-MSI for the matrix-matched standard and the kidney sections
| Matrix-matched standard | Kidney section | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyte | Theoretical | Slide no | Mass error (ppm) | Mass error (ppm) | ||
| 4-HHE | 228.17065 | C | 228.17035 | 1.31 | 228.17052 | 0.57 |
| TP1 | 228.17018 | 2.06 | 228.17022 | 1.88 | ||
| TP2 | 228.17052 | 0.57 | 228.17035 | 1.31 | ||
| TP3 | 228.17022 | 1.88 | 228.17024 | 1.80 | ||
| 4-ONE | 268.20195 | C | 268.20147 | 1.79 | 268.20171 | 0.89 |
| TP1 | 268.20173 | 0.82 | 268.20194 | 0.04 | ||
| TP2 | 268.20182 | 0.48 | 268.20178 | 0.63 | ||
| TP3 | 268.20171 | 0.89 | 268.20180 | 0.56 | ||
| 4-HNE | 270.21760 | C | 270.21732 | 1.04 | 270.21737 | 0.85 |
| TP2 | 270.21732 | 1.04 | 270.21731 | 1.07 | ||
| TP2 | 270.21732 | 1.04 | 270.21755 | 0.19 | ||
| TP3 | 270.21726 | 1.26 | 270.21728 | 1.18 | ||
Fig. 3Data obtained from representative MALDI-FT-ICR-MSI experiment with control and diabetic tissues for RAs: a 4-HHE, b 4-ONE, and c 4-HNE. Spectral overlay of theoretical simulated peaks with those of matrix-matched standard and kidney sections (data normalized by root mean square and calibrated using a CHCA peak (m/z 417.04830) and the ISTD (p-anisaldehyde) at m/z 266.14991 Scale and intensity bars inset)
Fig. 4Concentrations of RAs (ng/mL) in serum samples a and b kidney homogenate samples for control and diabetic mice at three time points (TP) n = 6/per TP. Normality of the data distribution was assessed using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test and through inspection of histograms and Q-Q plots. Normally distributed data followed parametric testing (analysis of variance (ANOVA)) and results were expressed as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined from a p value of < 0.05 (*), p value of < 0.01 (**), and p value of < 0.001 (***). Analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 25) (SPSS, IBM Analytics, New York, USA
p values for RAs detected in mouse serum, kidney homogenate, and MSI. p value obtained through Mann–Whitney U comparison of control vs diabetic tissues for each time point using IBM Statistics for Windows (Version 25) (SPSS, IBM Analytics, New York, USA)
| Aldehyde | Serum | Tissue H | Tissue MSI |
|---|---|---|---|
| C TP1 vs. D TP1 | 0.003** | 0.052 | 0.787 |
| D TP1 vs. D TP2 | 0.021* | 0.997 | 0.908 |
| D TP1 vs. D TP3 | 0.13 | 0.163 | 0.999 |
| C TP2 vs. D TP2 | 0.128 | 0.027* | 0.387 |
| D TP2 vs. D TP3 | 0.042* | 0.111 | 0.988 |
| C TP3 vs. D TP3 | 0.0001*** | 0.971 | 0.977 |
| C TP1 vs. D TP1 | 0.002** | 0.0001*** | 0.009** |
| D TP1 vs. D TP2 | 0.026* | 0.0001*** | 0.154 |
| D TP1 vs. D TP3 | 0.069 | 0.0002*** | 0.041* |
| C TP2 vs. D TP2 | 0.0001*** | 0.491 | 0.344 |
| D TP2 vs. D TP3 | 0.726 | 0.061 | 0.487 |
| C TP3 vs. D TP3 | 0.008** | 0.110 | 0.241 |
| C TP1 vs. D TP1 | < 0.0001*** | 0.0001*** | 0.04* |
| D TP1 vs. D TP2 | 0.025* | 0.0008*** | 0.03* |
| D TP1 vs. D TP3 | 0.016* | 0.0004*** | 0.02* |
| C TP2 vs. D TP2 | 0.001* | 0.0034** | 0.05* |
| D TP2 vs. D TP3 | > 0.999 | 0.0063** | 0.292 |
| C TP3 vs. D TP3 | 0.079 | 0.961 | 0.981 |