| Literature DB >> 35880893 |
Cristian A Suárez1, Soledad T Carrasco1, Facundo N A Brandolisio1, Virginia Abatangelo1, Carina A Boncompain1, Natalia Peresutti-Bacci1, Héctor R Morbidoni1.
Abstract
Epidemiology and virulence studies of Staphylococcus aureus showed that temperate bacteriophages are one of the most powerful drivers for its evolution not only because of their abundance but also because of the richness of their genetic payload. Here, we report the isolation, genome sequencing, and bioinformatic analysis of 14 bacteriophages induced from lysogenic S. aureus strains from human or veterinary (cattle) origin. The bacteriophages belonged to the Siphoviridae family; were of similar genome size (40 to 45 kbp); and fell into clusters B2, B3, B5, and B7 according to a recent clustering proposal. One of the phages, namely, vB_SauS_308, was the most unusual one, belonging to the sparsely populated subcluster B7 but showing differences in protein family contents compared with the rest of the members. This phage contains a type I endolysin (one catalytic domain and noncanonical cell wall domain [CBD]) and a host recognition module lacking receptor binding protein, cell wall hydrolase, and tail fiber proteins. This phage also lacked virulence genes, which is opposite to what has been reported for subcluster B6 and B7 members. None of six phages, taken as representatives of each of the four subclusters, showed activity on coagulase-negative staphylococci (excepted for two Staphylococcus hominis strains in which propagation and a very slow adsorption rate were observed) nor transducing ability. Immunity tests on S. aureus RN4220 lysogens with each of these phages showed no cross immunity. IMPORTANCE To the best of our knowledge, this set of sequenced bacteriophages is the largest one in South America. Our report describes for the first time the utilization of MultiTwin software to analyze the relationship between phage protein families. Notwithstanding the fact that most of the genetic information obtained correlated with recently published information, due to their geographical origin, the reported analysis adds up to and confirms currently available knowledge of Staphylococcus aureus temperate bacteriophages in terms of phylogeny and role in host evolution.Entities:
Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus; bacteriophages; genomic evolution
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35880893 PMCID: PMC9430571 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.00334-22
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiol Spectr ISSN: 2165-0497
List of S. aureus phages isolated throughout this work
| Phages | Source | No. of phages obtained/no. of samples analyzed | Method of collection | Geographic location |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 275, 277c, | Human isolates from hands of healthy carriers (meat retail market) | 37/75 | Induction with mitomycin C | La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina |
| I72, | Cow isolates (mastitis) | 4/23 | Induction with mitomycin C | Rafaela, Santa Fe, Argentina |
| Clinical isolates (blood cultures, soft tissue infections) | 10/18 | Induction with mitomycin C | Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina | |
| Mat_A, Mat_B, Mat_C, Mat_CB, Mat_D, Mat_E, Mat_F, Mat_G, Mat_H, Mat_I, Mat_J, Mat_K, Mat_L, Mat_N, Mat_T, Mat_Y, Mat_W, Mat_X, Mat_Z, Mat_13, Mat_25, Mat_29, Mat_33 | Nasal swabs from health care workers | 23/320 | Spontaneous release | Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina |
Phages analyzed in detail are shown in bold.
FIG 1Genomic organization of phages isolated during this work. ORFs were colored according to the assigned modules.
FIG 2Phylogenetic network of the Siphoviridae phages of S. aureus. An all-against-all genome comparison was performed using fragmented alignment by Gegenees (61); afterward, the network was calculated by Splitstree 4.0 using the Neighbor-Net algorithm (62). The majority of phages belong to the subclusters B2, B3, B5, B6, and B7 in accordance with Oliveira et al. (11). Phages described in this work are highlighted in bold.
MultiTwin analysis at 35% of similarity
| Twin id | Host(s) ( | Gene family id | Function | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 129 | B2 (29/29) | 255 | Tape measure chaperone | |
| 237 | Portal protein | |||
| 246 | Head-to-tail connector | |||
| 240 | Head morphogenesis protein | |||
| 254 | Tail assembly | |||
| 141 | B5 (35/35) | 92 | Terminase small subunit | |
| 66 | Transcriptional regulator | |||
| 108 | Major capsid protein | |||
| 166 | Tail tube protein | |||
| 338 | B3 (36/36)/B4 (2/2) | 467 | Tail assembly chaperone | |
| 463 | Head tail connector | |||
| 465 | Tail completion protein | |||
| 464 | Tail protein | |||
| 431 | Head morphogenesis | |||
| 466 | Major tail protein | |||
| 160 | B6 (18/18) | 306 | Terminase small subunit | |
| 307 | Portal protein | |||
| 94 | Terminase large subunit | |||
| 175 | B7 (14/14) | 620 | Tail assembly chaperone | |
| 631 | MazG_like_nucleotide_pyrophosphohydrolase | |||
| 98 | Portal protein |
The twins with the highest number of gene family members are listed (core twins).
id, identity.
The number of phages of S. aureus subclusters for each twin is indicated.
MultiTwin analysis at 95% of similarity
| Twin id | Host | Subcluster | Gene family id | Function |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 375 |
| B6 (18/18) | 543 | Clp_protease_like_protein |
| 1705 | rinA | |||
| 1712 | Portal_protein | |||
| 516 | Terminase_large_subunit | |||
| 1711 | Terminase small subunit | |||
| 192 |
| B2 (28/29) | 1390 | Tape measure chaperone |
| 1152 | Minor capsid protein | |||
| 1130 | Portal protein | |||
| 365 |
| B3 (19/36) | 2191 | Tail assembly protein |
| 1513 | Phage tail protein | |||
| 2172 | Putative major tail protein | |||
| 2167 | Head tail protein | |||
| 2186 | Major tail protein | |||
| 1524 | Minor structural protein | |||
| 2181 | Tail completion protein | |||
| 50 |
| B6 (17/18) | 1731 | MTP |
| 1728 | HP | |||
| 1713 | Major capsid protein | |||
| 80 |
| B7 (13/14) | 2463 | Nucleoside triphosphate pyrophosphohydrolase family protein |
| 538 | Portal protein | |||
| 510 | HNH endonuclease | |||
| 2428 | Terminase small | |||
| 2450 | HK97 protein family | |||
| 156 |
| B5 (35/35) | 699 | RBP |
| 542 | Clp_protease_like_protein | |||
| 544 | Major capsid protein | |||
| 513 | Terminase small | |||
| 611 | Major tail protein | |||
| 691 | Tail endopeptidase | |||
| 606 | Major tail protein | |||
| 463 |
| B3 (17/36) | 2194 | Tail assembly chaperone |
| 2185 | DUF3168 protein | |||
| 1523 | Tail endopeptidase |
The twins with the highest numbers of gene family members are listed (core twins).
The numbers of phages of S. aureus subclusters for each twin are indicated.
FIG 3Analysis of gene sharing using a bipartite network display. The network was calculated by the program MultiTwin (63), and a graph was generated using Cytoscape (64). The graph is composed by two types of nodes, namely, the genomes (colored) and the gene families (gray). (A) Displays the bipartite network colored by host, left at 35% of identity and right 95% of identity. (B) Shows the bipartite network colored by the S. aureus subcluster at 35% and 95% of identity (left and right, respectively). Genome distribution was grouped into modules (black circles).
FIG 4Phylogenetic analysis of the S. aureus phage integrases. The classification of integrases in different groups (Sa1 to Sa12) was made on the basis of the nucleotide sequence comparison using ClustalW (65). The evolutionary history was inferred by means of the NJ algorithm, and the phylogenetic tree graph was made with iTOL (67). The integrases of phages reported in this work are shown in bold.
FIG 5Prediction of the packaging strategy. (A) The phylogenetic relationships of the TerL proteins were obtained through protein sequence alignment using the MAFFT program (68) with the iterative method G-INS-i and FastTree program (72). (B) Scheme of the genetic organization of the DNA packing module of the 14 phages characterized during this work. HP, hypothetical protein; TerS, terminase small subunit; TerL, terminase large subunit; MCP, major capsid protein; HNH, homing endonuclease.
FIG 6Endolysin domain organization. CHAP, cystine histidine amidopeptide hydrolase; Ami_2 and Ami_3, Amidase_2 and Amidase_3, respectively; I_CBD, V_CBD and SH3_5, cell wall binding domains.
FIG 7Host recognition module organization. The organization of proteins hypothetically involved in the host recognition of phages of different subclusters is shown. For simplicity, only one representative phage of each subcluster was included. The figure was made using the EasyFig 2.0 program (72). MTP, major tail protein; TMP, tape measure protein; Dit, distal protein; Tal, tail associate lysin; RBP, receptor binding protein; FibL, tail fiber protein; Hyd, cell wall hydrolase; FibU, collagen-like fiber protein; PTT, phage tail tube protein.
FIG 8Phylogenetic analysis of tape measure proteins (TMPs). The amino acid sequences of 169 TMPs were aligned using MAFFT (68), and the phylogenetic tree was estimated by applying the maximum likelihood algorithm with the PhyML program (70). The representation of the tree was made with iTOL. The outermost bars represent the length (amino acids) of each TMP protein. S. aureus subclusters or other non-S. aureus Staphylococcus hosts are identified with different colors as shown on the right side of the figure. TMPs of phages described in this work are marked by red dots.
Analysis of the correlation of endolysin type, holin length, and integrase
| Type_endoysin | Holin length (nt | Integrase group | Phage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Group_I | 255 | Sa3 | 13, 42e, N315, phiNM3, tp310-3 |
| Sa5 | 187, PV83 | ||
| Sa6 |
| ||
| Group_III | 438 | Sa1 | 55 |
| Sa5 | 11, 29, 88, phiMR25, | ||
| Sa6 | 52a, 80 | ||
| Sa7 | 92, phiNM2, | ||
| Sa9 |
| ||
| Sa12 | MR11 | ||
| Sa7 |
| ||
| Sa7 | X2 | ||
| Sa7 | 85 | ||
| Sa8 | IPLA88 | ||
| 423 | Sa10 | 37 | |
| 435 | Sa11 | EW | |
| Group_IV | 303 | Sa2 | 47, phi2958PVL, PhiPVL-CN125, phiSLT, PVL, PVL108, tp310-1, |
| Sa4 | IPLA35, | ||
| Sa5 | phiNM1 | ||
| Sa6 | 77, phiNM4, ROSA, TP310-2 | ||
| Sa7 | 53, 80-alfa, | ||
| Sa9 | 96 | ||
| Group_V | 276 | Sa1 | 71, phiETA, phiETA2, phiETA3, |
nt, nucleotides.
Phages isolated throughout this work are shown in bold.