Literature DB >> 35880843

Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus accumulation in the phloem inhibits callose and reactive oxygen species.

Chiara Bernardini1, Donielle Turner1, Chunxia Wang1, Stacy Welker1, Diann Achor1, Yosvanis Acanda Artiga1, Robert Turgeon2, Amit Levy1,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35880843      PMCID: PMC9516723          DOI: 10.1093/plphys/kiac346

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Physiol        ISSN: 0032-0889            Impact factor:   8.005


× No keyword cloud information.
Dear Editor, Huanglongbing (HLB) is a severe disease in citrus that is associated with Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas). The study of CLas–phloem interaction has been hampered because of the low and unequal distribution of CLas inside trees, and the difficulty in isolating vasculature from trees. Previous studies reached the conclusion that infection increases sieve pores callose levels and the production of H2O2, blocking the phloem and causing a toxic build-up leading to programmed death (Achor et al., 2010; Pitino et al., 2017; Deng et al., 2019; Welker et al., 2021; Ma et al., 2022), but even so the bacteria can still move in the phloem. To better understand CLas–phloem interactions, we used the isolated vasculatures of “Hamlin” sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) and “Duncan” grapefruit (Citrus paradisi) seeds, which highly accumulate CLas (Figure 1A). We show that CLas inhibits plant cellular defense responses to allow its movement through the sieve pores.
Figure 1

CLas accumulates in seed vasculature and reduces phloem plugging. A, CLas accumulates in the seed coat vasculature (i–ii; iv–v): Transmission electron microscope (TEM) micrographs of seed vasculature of “Hamlin” Sweet Orange (i; iv) and “Duncan” grapefruit (ii; vi) from HLB trees (infected) or trees grown under protective screen (healthy). triangles = CLas. (iii; vi): fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) micrographs of healthy and infected seed vasculatures of “Duncan” grapefruit (iii–vii). Nuclei are labeled with 4′,6-diamidine-2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) and CLas labeled with a FISH probe. Bars in i, ii =0.6 µm; iv, v = 0.5 µm; iii = 10 µm, and vi = 7.5 µm. B, Micrographs of healthy (i and ii) and infected (iii and iv) seed vasculatures of “Hamlin” sweet orange (bar = 1, 0.6, 1, and 1 µm, respectively) and micrographs of healthy (v and vi) and infected (vii and viii) seed vasculatures of “Duncan” grapefruit (bar = 1, 0.6, 2, and 0.8 µm, respectively). Arrows = sieve pores, triangles = CLas. C, Sieve plate pore size in “Hamlin” sweet orange and “Duncan” grapefruit. The lower end of the whiskers shows the minimum value and the upper end of the whiskers shows the maximum value. The lower bottom of the box represents the 25 percentile of data from the smallest, the horizontal line in the box the median and the upper bottom the 75th percentile. Larger points are outliers. Asterisk expresses significant differences among the means (n = 85 and 83 sieve pores of healthy and infected “Duncan” Grapefruit, respectively, and 102 and 87 of healthy and infected “Hamlin” Sweet Orange, respectively), with P ≤ 0.05 (Student’s t test). D, Relative abundance of CsCalS gene transcripts in healthy and infected seed vasculature of “Duncan” grapefruit. E, Relative abundance of CsPP2-B10 gene transcripts in healthy and infected seed vasculature of “Duncan” grapefruit. Data are expressed as mean ± SE of four independent biological replicates (total four trees, each replicate is a pool of seed vasculatures from one tree). Differences among healthy and infected means were evaluated with Student’s t test. Asterisks represent significant differences at P ≤ 0.05.

CLas accumulates in seed vasculature and reduces phloem plugging. A, CLas accumulates in the seed coat vasculature (i–ii; iv–v): Transmission electron microscope (TEM) micrographs of seed vasculature of “Hamlin” Sweet Orange (i; iv) and “Duncan” grapefruit (ii; vi) from HLB trees (infected) or trees grown under protective screen (healthy). triangles = CLas. (iii; vi): fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) micrographs of healthy and infected seed vasculatures of “Duncan” grapefruit (iii–vii). Nuclei are labeled with 4′,6-diamidine-2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride (DAPI) and CLas labeled with a FISH probe. Bars in i, ii =0.6 µm; iv, v = 0.5 µm; iii = 10 µm, and vi = 7.5 µm. B, Micrographs of healthy (i and ii) and infected (iii and iv) seed vasculatures of “Hamlin” sweet orange (bar = 1, 0.6, 1, and 1 µm, respectively) and micrographs of healthy (v and vi) and infected (vii and viii) seed vasculatures of “Duncan” grapefruit (bar = 1, 0.6, 2, and 0.8 µm, respectively). Arrows = sieve pores, triangles = CLas. C, Sieve plate pore size in “Hamlin” sweet orange and “Duncan” grapefruit. The lower end of the whiskers shows the minimum value and the upper end of the whiskers shows the maximum value. The lower bottom of the box represents the 25 percentile of data from the smallest, the horizontal line in the box the median and the upper bottom the 75th percentile. Larger points are outliers. Asterisk expresses significant differences among the means (n = 85 and 83 sieve pores of healthy and infected “Duncan” Grapefruit, respectively, and 102 and 87 of healthy and infected “Hamlin” Sweet Orange, respectively), with P ≤ 0.05 (Student’s t test). D, Relative abundance of CsCalS gene transcripts in healthy and infected seed vasculature of “Duncan” grapefruit. E, Relative abundance of CsPP2-B10 gene transcripts in healthy and infected seed vasculature of “Duncan” grapefruit. Data are expressed as mean ± SE of four independent biological replicates (total four trees, each replicate is a pool of seed vasculatures from one tree). Differences among healthy and infected means were evaluated with Student’s t test. Asterisks represent significant differences at P ≤ 0.05. Callose is a polymer of β-1,3 glucan, synthetized by callose synthases, that forms structural components of plant cells (Ellinger and Voigt, 2014). In infected leaves callose accumulated in the sieve pores, the expression of C. sinensis CalS and phloem protein 2 (CsPP2) genes increased, and the phloem pore opening decreased, but these sieve elements (SEs) had very low levels of CLas (Granato et al., 2019; Achor et al., 2020). We examined SEs in infected leaves, and observed CLas, on average, in only ∼7.76% of the SEs (Supplemental Table S1). While we cannot rule out the presence of CLas in more SEs because of the thinness of the sections, these results indicate that CLas levels in leaves are low and suggest that the extensive callose and H2O2 accumulation are mainly plant immune responses. In sink tissues, CLas was present in higher numbers (suggesting CLas predominantly traffics along with phloem translocation) and callose levels were lower (Achor et al., 2020). In seed vasculatures sieve plate (SP) pores were not occluded by callose (Achor et al., 2020; this study). To determine whether this resulted from a lack of callose deposition in the seeds, or from the presence of CLas, we compared infected and uninfected seed vasculature (Supplemental materials and methods). Thick deposits of callose were present at the SPs of healthy sweet orange and grapefruit seed vasculatures (Figure 1B). In infected seeds, SEs lumen was filled by bacteria and no callose layer was visible inside the pores. Pore opening increased significantly (Figure 1C) and the expression of CsCalS and CsPP2 genes was downregulated (Figure 1, D and E). To assess if the lack of callose is related with the seed vasculature or is a general activity of the pathogen, we examined the sieve pores in young leaf midribs from infected trees (Figure 2A). In the cells that contained CLas, the pore diameter increased compared to the cells without CLas (Figure 2, A and B). These results indicate that CLas either inhibits the deposition of callose or induces its removal in both leaves and seeds. The reduction of the callose layer increased the available cytoplasmic space in the sieve pores and consequently we could observe CLas crossing the SPs (Supplemental Figure S1). This activity resembles the movement protein of viruses that also inhibit the deposition of callose to facilitate movement through plasmodesmata (Rojas et al., 1997; Guenoune-Gelbart et al., 2008; Wang, 2021).
Figure 2

CLas Inhibits plant defense response. A, Percentage of cells without CLas- or with CLas in midrib of HLB-infected plant, and micrograph of sieve plates in CLas-free (i; bars = 0.8 µm) or CLas-containing (ii; bars = 0.8 and 0.6 µm) cells, all from infected trees. Arrows = sieve pores, triangles =CLas, CC = companion cells. B, Pore opening value in CLas-free and CLas-containing cells. The boxplot reports the pore opening in nm. Asterisk expresses significant differences among the means (n = 106 sieve pores of CLas-free SEs and 92 pores in SE with CLas), with P ≤ 0.05 (Student’s t test). The lower end of the whiskers shows the minimum value and the upper end of the whiskers shows the maximum value. The lower bottom of the box represents the 25th percentile of data from the smallest, the horizontal line in the box the median and the upper bottom the 75th percentile. Larger points are outliers. Picture created with BioRender software (BioRender.com, 2022). C, “Duncan” grapefruit leaves stained with DAB from healthy and infected plants (i). Bar = 5 cm. Optical density of healthy and infected leaves (five healthy and five infected trees; at least six leaves were randomly selected in each plant) (ii). Asterisk expresses significant differences among the means (Student’s t test, P ≤ 0.05). CsRBOH leaf expression level in “Duncan” grapefruit (iii), expressed as mean ± SE of four independent biological replicates (each replicate is a pool of three leaf midribs from one tree). Asterisk expresses significant differences among the means (Student’s t test, P ≤0.05). D, “Duncan” grapefruit vasculatures stained with DAB (i) from healthy and infected seeds. Bar = 4 mm. Optical density of healthy and infected seed vasculatures (ii). Asterisk expresses significant differences among the means (at least 10 seed vasculatures were extracted from 3 fruits chosen randomly from each of 5 healthy and 5 infected trees) (Student’s t test, P ≤ 0.05). CsRBOH seed vasculature expression level (iii) in “Duncan” grapefruit seed vasculatures expressed as mean ± se of four independent biological replicates (each replicate is a pool of seed vasculatures from one tree). Asterisk denotes significant differences among the means (Student’s t test, P ≤ 0.05). E, Model for CLas–phloem interaction in HLB-infected trees. In healthy SEs, a physiological level of ROS , salicylic acid (SA), and Ca2+ is present in the phloem sap. Around the sieve pores, a normal physiological layer of callose ensures proper transport of substances through the phloem. In infected SE cells without CLas, the ROS and SA contents increase. Ca2+ may increase as well. Callose completely occludes the sieve pores. In CLas-containing SE cells, ROS concentration decreases. The concentration of Ca2+ and SA probably decrease as well. Sieve pore callose is completely absent, allowing the movement of the bacteria. Ca2+ = calcium ions. Picture created with BioRender software (BioRender.com, 2022).

CLas Inhibits plant defense response. A, Percentage of cells without CLas- or with CLas in midrib of HLB-infected plant, and micrograph of sieve plates in CLas-free (i; bars = 0.8 µm) or CLas-containing (ii; bars = 0.8 and 0.6 µm) cells, all from infected trees. Arrows = sieve pores, triangles =CLas, CC = companion cells. B, Pore opening value in CLas-free and CLas-containing cells. The boxplot reports the pore opening in nm. Asterisk expresses significant differences among the means (n = 106 sieve pores of CLas-free SEs and 92 pores in SE with CLas), with P ≤ 0.05 (Student’s t test). The lower end of the whiskers shows the minimum value and the upper end of the whiskers shows the maximum value. The lower bottom of the box represents the 25th percentile of data from the smallest, the horizontal line in the box the median and the upper bottom the 75th percentile. Larger points are outliers. Picture created with BioRender software (BioRender.com, 2022). C, “Duncan” grapefruit leaves stained with DAB from healthy and infected plants (i). Bar = 5 cm. Optical density of healthy and infected leaves (five healthy and five infected trees; at least six leaves were randomly selected in each plant) (ii). Asterisk expresses significant differences among the means (Student’s t test, P ≤ 0.05). CsRBOH leaf expression level in “Duncan” grapefruit (iii), expressed as mean ± SE of four independent biological replicates (each replicate is a pool of three leaf midribs from one tree). Asterisk expresses significant differences among the means (Student’s t test, P ≤0.05). D, “Duncan” grapefruit vasculatures stained with DAB (i) from healthy and infected seeds. Bar = 4 mm. Optical density of healthy and infected seed vasculatures (ii). Asterisk expresses significant differences among the means (at least 10 seed vasculatures were extracted from 3 fruits chosen randomly from each of 5 healthy and 5 infected trees) (Student’s t test, P ≤ 0.05). CsRBOH seed vasculature expression level (iii) in “Duncan” grapefruit seed vasculatures expressed as mean ± se of four independent biological replicates (each replicate is a pool of seed vasculatures from one tree). Asterisk denotes significant differences among the means (Student’s t test, P ≤ 0.05). E, Model for CLas–phloem interaction in HLB-infected trees. In healthy SEs, a physiological level of ROS , salicylic acid (SA), and Ca2+ is present in the phloem sap. Around the sieve pores, a normal physiological layer of callose ensures proper transport of substances through the phloem. In infected SE cells without CLas, the ROS and SA contents increase. Ca2+ may increase as well. Callose completely occludes the sieve pores. In CLas-containing SE cells, ROS concentration decreases. The concentration of Ca2+ and SA probably decrease as well. Sieve pore callose is completely absent, allowing the movement of the bacteria. Ca2+ = calcium ions. Picture created with BioRender software (BioRender.com, 2022). Previous research demonstrated that reactive oxygen species (ROS) were also elevated in CLas-infected leaves (Pitino et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2022). We measured the intensity of 3,3'-diaminobenzidine (DAB) staining (which turns red in the presence of H2O2) in leaves and seed vasculatures from healthy and infected samples (Supplemental materials and methods). Infected leaves had more stained areas, indicating the production of H2O2 (Figure 2C). In the seed vasculatures, H2O2 levels were lower in infected samples compared to the healthy ones (Figure 2D). The RBOH protein is the provider of ions, a ROS (Pitino et al., 2017). In the seed vasculature, the CsRBOH gene was downregulated in case of infection (Figure 2D (iii)), while no significant modulation of CsRBOH occurred in the leaves (Figure 2C (iii)). The contrasting results between leaves and seed vasculatures (in which CLas is present at much higher numbers) indicate that CLas inhibits H2O2 production inside cells. Results from this work are summarized in Figure 2E. Healthy plant SEs have a normal layer of callose around the sieve pore and physiological level of ROS. In infected SEs that do not contain bacteria, there is an increase of callose and ROS. In cells where CLas accumulates, callose and ROS are reduced, allowing the bacteria to survive and move. We hypothesize that the callose and ROS accumulation may result from increased Ca2+ and SA (Nehela et al., 2018; Liu et al., 2019). The pathogen may locally subtract Ca2+ (Liu et al., 2019), reduce ROS toxicity (Jain et al., 2015), and hydrolyze SA (Li et al., 2017). CLas-secreted peroxiredoxin was shown to suppress the plant immune response, including callose and ROS (Jain et al., 2018). HLB disease symptoms appear to result from a failed strategy on the part of the citrus host, where the cost of defense outweighs the damage done by the pathogen itself. Analysis of the CLas genome reveals an organism with largely defensive capabilities, making sense for an obligate parasite (Duan et al., 2009). Blocking the attempts of CLas to bypass the plant defenses can provide a strategy for eliminating the bacteria and establish resistant varieties. Paradoxically, the bacterial activities that counteract the host defenses may also alleviate some disease symptoms. Plants which have less callose expression have shown better resistance to powdery mildew (Jacobs et al., 2003; Nishimura et al., 2003). This phenomenon has not been studied in the context of phloem bacterial pathogens. Considering this information, a “non-confrontational” strategy for the development of HLB-tolerant citrus might also be considered. Citrus stocks which naturally exhibit low callose and ROS responses to CLas seem to remain free from the symptoms (Deng et al., 2019; Curtolo et al., 2020). This strategy might also be examined in other plant–pathogen interactions which involve bacteria inhabiting the vascular system. Future work is required to explore this possibility.

Supplemental data

The following materials are available in the online version of this article. CLas passage through open sieve pores in seed vasculatures. Percentage of SE containing CLas in young leaves (2-year observation). Click here for additional data file.
  16 in total

1.  Prophage-Encoded Peroxidase in 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' Is a Secreted Effector That Suppresses Plant Defenses.

Authors:  Mukesh Jain; Laura A Fleites; Dean W Gabriel
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 4.171

2.  A Secreted 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' Peroxiredoxin Simultaneously Suppresses Both Localized and Systemic Innate Immune Responses In Planta.

Authors:  Mukesh Jain; Alejandra Munoz-Bodnar; Shujian Zhang; Dean W Gabriel
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 4.171

Review 3.  Cell-to-cell movement of plant viruses via plasmodesmata: a current perspective on potyviruses.

Authors:  Aiming Wang
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2021-03-27       Impact factor: 7.090

4.  Capsid protein and helper component-proteinase function as potyvirus cell-to-cell movement proteins.

Authors:  M R Rojas; F M Zerbini; R F Allison; R L Gilbertson; W J Lucas
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1997-10-27       Impact factor: 3.616

5.  Phloem transport limitation in Huanglongbing-affected sweet orange is dependent on phloem-limited bacteria and callose.

Authors:  Stacy Welker; Myrtho Pierre; James P Santiago; Manjul Dutt; Christopher Vincent; Amit Levy
Journal:  Tree Physiol       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.196

6.  Molecular mechanisms behind the accumulation of ATP and H2O2 in citrus plants in response to 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' infection.

Authors:  Marco Pitino; Cheryl M Armstrong; Yongping Duan
Journal:  Hortic Res       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 6.793

7.  An Arabidopsis Callose Synthase, GSL5, Is Required for Wound and Papillary Callose Formation.

Authors:  Andrew K Jacobs; Volker Lipka; Rachel A Burton; Ralph Panstruga; Nicolai Strizhov; Paul Schulze-Lefert; Geoffrey B Fincher
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2003-10-10       Impact factor: 11.277

8.  Loss of a callose synthase results in salicylic acid-dependent disease resistance.

Authors:  Marc T Nishimura; Monica Stein; Bi-Huei Hou; John P Vogel; Herb Edwards; Shauna C Somerville
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Complete genome sequence of citrus huanglongbing bacterium, 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' obtained through metagenomics.

Authors:  Yongping Duan; Lijuan Zhou; David G Hall; Wenbin Li; Harshavardhan Doddapaneni; Hong Lin; Li Liu; Cheryl M Vahling; Dean W Gabriel; Kelly P Williams; Allan Dickerman; Yijun Sun; Tim Gottwald
Journal:  Mol Plant Microbe Interact       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.171

10.  Phloem Regeneration Is a Mechanism for Huanglongbing-Tolerance of "Bearss" Lemon and "LB8-9" Sugar Belle® Mandarin.

Authors:  Honghong Deng; Diann Achor; Ed Exteberria; Qibin Yu; Dongliang Du; Daniel Stanton; Guolu Liang; Fred G Gmitter
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.