| Literature DB >> 35880096 |
Abstract
With the continuous improvement of people's living standards, the requirements of music majors for their training standards are also increasing, which leads to the development of music training in the direction of intelligence. This paper discusses the problems of breathing, coordination, and muscle control ability in vocal training and puts forward a vocal training method based on dynamic adjustment factor and Monte Carlo algorithm to solve the difficult problem of vocal training for college students and understand the relationship between vocal training and exercise. Firstly, the sports training set and vocal pronunciation training set are constructed in the form of clustering, and the samples in the set are analyzed discretely to ensure that the samples conform to normal distribution; then, using the Monte Carlo algorithm analyzes the two sample sets and finds out the relationship between exercise and vocal training. Finally, according to breathing, coordination, muscle control ability, and other indicators, calculate the impact of exercise on vocal sound. MATLAB simulation shows that the method proposed in this paper can analyze the influence of exercise on vocal vocalization from the perspective of breathing, coordination, muscle control ability, and other indicators. The accuracy of judgment results is more than 95%, and the time is less than 1 min. All indicators are better than traditional vocal training methods (90%, 2 min), which shows the effectiveness of the method proposed in this paper.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35880096 PMCID: PMC9308556 DOI: 10.1155/2022/3443404
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Contents of vocal training for college students.
| Type | Exercise | Vocal training | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Exercise time (months) | Exercise content ( | Breath (ml) | Muscle strength ( | |
| Folk music | 4.2 | 31 | 16.11 | 4.73 |
| Popular | 3.2 | 71 | 18.32 | 7.96 |
| Jazz | 3.5 | 23 | 31.11 | 2.68 |
| Rock and roll | 5.2 | 12 | 22.38 | 2.58 |
| Opera | 3.2 | 22 | 19.13 | 1.13 |
| Others | 4.2 | 81 | 29.15 | 1.98 |
Evaluation of traditional training results.
| Indicators | Evaluation criteria | Score | Exercise combination |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| … |
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 1Dynamic adjustment of exercise content to vocal training.
Figure 2Steps for improving the vocal training method.
Judgment results of different functions.
| Function | Sports content | Content quantity | Optimal scheme number | Number of policies | Optimization success degree | Degree of conformity with standards | Standard number |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breath | Running | 3 | 2 | 3 | 90.2 | 95.4 | 4 |
| Skipping rope | 2 | 2 | 7 | 92.3 | 92.6 | 2 | |
|
| |||||||
| Coordination | Push-ups | 3 | 3 | 4 | 95.7 | 98.9 | 3 |
| Sit-ups | 2 | 2 | 9 | 91.8 | 95.3 | 4 | |
|
| |||||||
| Strength | Shot put | 2 | 1 | 5 | 89.3 | 94.7 | 2 |
| Shot put | 4 | 2 | 4 | 85.7 | 96.8 | 3 | |
|
| |||||||
| Final result | Javelin | 2 | 1 | 3 | 92.4 | 92.4 | 11 |
| Long jump | 3 | 3 | 6 | 93.6 | 90.1 | 4 | |
Figure 3Vocal training effect of the breath test.
Figure 4Vocal training effect of the coordination test.
Figure 5Coordination test effect of the strength test.
Figure 6Overall training effect of vocal music training.
Collection of the types and proportion of exercise content.
| Group | Training content | Training score | Training results |
|---|---|---|---|
| The improved method proposed in this paper | Bel canto | 23 ± 1.12 | Excellent |
| Folk music | 12 ± 0.23 | Excellent | |
| Popular | 81 ± 0.47 | Excellent | |
|
| |||
| Traditional training method | Bel canto | 22 ± 0.72 | Good |
| Folk music | 9 ± 0.42 | Good | |
| Popular | 73 ± 0.21 | Good | |
Note: compared with traditional training methods, P < 0.05.
Figure 7Composition of the data set.
Figure 8Comparison of fitness schemes of different methods.
Recognition accuracy of different analysis methods.
| Scheme type | Improved vocal training methods | Traditional analysis method | Qualitative analysis method | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breath | Strength | Breath | Strength | Breath | Strength | |
| Strength type | 96.91 | 97.94 | 94.85 | 95.88 | 98.97 | 96.91 |
| Aerobic type | 91.03 | 95.88 | 92.78 | 93.81 | 97.94 | 91.03 |
| Anaerobic type | 93.81 | 80.03 | 96.91 | 90.00 | 91.03 | 93.81 |
| Comprehensive type | 97.94 | 91.03 | 95.88 | 90.00 | 95.88 | 97.94 |