| Literature DB >> 35879996 |
Abstract
Islands are broadly recognized as hotspots of ecology, biological and geophysical diversity with unique plant species. The present study aimed to address the floristic composition in the Az Zakhnuniyah Island along the Arabian Gulf of Saudi Arabia. A total of 21 quadrats, of 100 m2 each were sampled, and both relative density and cover were determined. Classification (Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering {AHC} and ordination [Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) and Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA)] were applied to identify vegetation clusters and their correlation to the underlying soil factors. Fifty plant species belonging to 21 families were recorded. Amaranthaceae (22.9%), Poaceae (12.5%), Asteraceae and Zygophyllaceae (8.33% each) were the largest represented families. Therophytes and chamaephytes were the most represented life-forms, indicating saline-desert vegetation. Most of the surveyed plant species are used for medicinal purposes and grazing. AHC and DCA allowed identifying three vegetation clusters within three distinct habitats: cluster (A): Halopeplis perfoliata- Suaeda vermiculata in wet salt-marsh habitat, cluster (B): Limonium axillare- Zygophyllum mandaville in sabkha, and cluster (C): Heliotropium bacciferum- Panicum turgidum in sand dune habitat within the island. The CCA results imply strong relationships between floristic composition and salinity measures (CaCO3, electric conductivity, Mg+2, Na+, K+, Cl- and SO4) and soil texture. The current vegetation pattern in Zakhnuniyah Island reflects a salinity gradient with variations in soil texture. Knowledge of the floristic composition and its correlation to the environmental factors within islands should guide future conservation strategy and management efforts.Entities:
Keywords: Biodiversity; Cluster analysis; Conservation; Halophytes; Ordination; Salt marshes
Year: 2022 PMID: 35879996 PMCID: PMC9307451 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09996
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Location map and distribution of quadrats (1-21) within the Zakhnuniyah Island, Saudi Arabia.
Floristic composition of Zakhnuniyah Island.
| Species | Family | Life-form | Growth-form | Chorotype | Use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poaceae | G | Grass | IT + SA | Grazing | |
| Amaranthaceae | Ch | Shrub | SA | Medicinal & grazing | |
| Amaranthaceae | Ch | Shrub | ME + IT | Grazing | |
| Fabaceae | Ch | Shrub | SA | Medicinal | |
| Amaranthaceae | Ch | Shrub | SA + SU | Medicinal& grazing | |
| Poaceae | H | Grass | SA + SU | Grazing | |
| Convolvulaceae | H | Shrub | ME + IT | Medicinal& grazing | |
| Cyperaceae | G | Herb | SA | Medicinal& grazing | |
| Zygophyllaceae | Ch | Herb | SA | Medicinal | |
| Amaranthaceae | Ch | Shrub | ME + IT | Medicinal | |
| Amaranthaceae | Ch | Shrub | ME + IT | Other use | |
| Amaranthaceae | Ch | Shrub | IT | Medicinal& grazing | |
| Boraginaceae | Ch | Herb | SA | Medicinal | |
| Juncaceae | G | Grass | IT + SA | Medicinal& grazing | |
| Poaceae | G | Grass | SU | Grazing | |
| Apocynaceae | Ph | Shrub | SA + SU | Medicinal | |
| Plumbaginaceae | H | Shrub | SA | Medicinal | |
| Poaceae | H | Grass | SA + SU | Grazing | |
| Amaranthaceae | Ch | Shrub | SA | Grazing | |
| Amaranthaceae | Ch | Shrub | SA | Medicinal | |
| Zygophyllaceae | Ch | Shrub | SA | Medicinal | |
| Zygophyllaceae | Ch | Shrub | SA | Medicinal | |
| Aizoaceae | Th | Herb | ME + SA | Grazing | |
| Amaranthaceae | Th | Herb | COSM | Medicinal | |
| Brassicaceae | Th | Herb | SA | Medicinal | |
| Poaceae | Th | Grass | TR + SA | Medicinal& grazing | |
| Brassicaceae | Th | Herb | ME + IT | Grazing | |
| Convolvulaceae | Th | Herb | TR + SA | Other use | |
| Cleomaceae | Th | Herb | SA + SU | Medicinal& grazing | |
| Amaranthaceae | Th | Herb | COSM | Medicinal | |
| Geraniaceae | Th | Herb | ME + IT | Medicinal | |
| Euphorbiaceae | Th | Herb | COSM | Medicinal | |
| Poaceae | Th | Grass | ME + IT | Grazing | |
| Asteraceae | Th | Herb | ME + SA | Medicinal& grazing | |
| Fabaceae | Th | Herb | ME + SA | Grazing | |
| Malvaceae | Th | Herb | ME + IT | Medicinal &food | |
| Fabaceae | Th | Herb | PAL | Medicinal | |
| Boraginaceae | Th | Herb | SA | Medicinal | |
| Neuradaceae | Th | Herb | COSM | Medicinal& grazing | |
| Caryophyllaceae | Th | Herb | SA | Grazing | |
| Plantaginaceae | Th | Herb | COSM | Grazing | |
| Poaceae | Th | Grass | COSM | Grazing | |
| Resedaceae | Th | Herb | SA | Other use | |
| Polygonaceae | Th | Herb | SA | Medicinal | |
| Asteraceae | Th | Herb | SA | Grazing | |
| Caryophyllaceae | Th | Herb | SA | Other use | |
| Asteraceae | Th | Herb | COSM | Medicinal | |
| Amaranthaceae | Th | Herb | SA | Medicinal | |
| Zygophyllaceae | Th | Herb | ME + SU | Medicinal& grazing | |
| Fabaceae | Th | Herb | SA | Medicinal | |
Th: therophyte; Ch: chamaephyte; H: hemicryptophytes; Ph: phanerophytes; G: geophytes; COSM: cosmopolitan; ME: Mediterranean; IT: Irano-Turanian; PAL: Palaeotropical; SA = Saharo-Arabian; SU: Sudano; TR: Tropical.
Figure 2Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering (AHC) using Pearson-similarity coefficient among sampled quadrats (1-21). Letters (A, B and C) are coded for the vegetation clusters.
Floristic features of the three identified vegetation clusters (A, B and C). The numbers in brackets represent the importance value (out of 200) of each species.
| Feature | Vegetation cluster | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | |
| No. of quadrats | 10 | 8 | 3 |
| Total number of species | 31 | 38 | 25 |
| Dominant and co-dominant species | |||
| Important associated species | |||
| Habitat-type | Salt marshes | Sabkhas | Sand dunes |
Figure 3Detrended Correspondence Analysis (DCA) of the three vegetation clusters (A, B and C). Numbers represent the quadrat numbers (Q1-Q21).
Physical and chemical properties of soil in the three vegetation clusters (A, B and C).
| Soil parameter | Vegetation cluster | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | ||
| Sand (%) | 87.40 ± 8.94a | 97.25 ± 1.92a | 91.33 ± 3.17a | 0.066 |
| Silt (%) | 0.40 ± 0.10a | 0.50 ± 0.30a | 3.33 ± 0.67b | 0.008∗ |
| Clay (%) | 3.20 ± 1.08a | 2.25 ± 1.44a | 5.33 ± 3.33a | 0.246 |
| CaCO3 (%) | 15.99 ± 3.69a | 7.34 ± 1.06a | 3.37 ± 0.31a | 0.054 |
| pH | 6.69 ± 0.14a | 6.56 ± 0.21a | 6.89 ± 0.18a | 0.213 |
| EC (dS cm−1) | 88.68 ± 20.05b | 46.76 ± 11.44ab | 3.59 ± 0.73a | 0.045∗ |
| Ca++ (meq/L) | 1195.22 ± 185.67a | 934.94 ± 202.76a | 154.66 ± 19.40a | 0.054 |
| Mg++ (meq/L) | 1727.16 ± 489.54b | 766.22 ± 188.96ab | 51.27 ± 14.04a | 0.026∗ |
| Na+ (meq/L) | 17659.40 ± 4750.40a | 7856.62 ± 1917.96a | 275.38 ± 79.41a | 0.040∗ |
| K+ (meq/L) | 845.85 ± 215.68b | 342.69 ± 79.12ab | 22.23 ± 4.29a | 0.040∗ |
| Cl− (meq/L) | 38657.20 ± 10005.36b | 16295.30 ± 4228.38ab | 311.13 ± 89.29a | 0.031∗ |
| SO4-- (meq/L) | 4546.43 ± 656.80a | 2954.65 ± 574.21a | 464.28 ± 118.40a | 0.040∗ |
| Fe (meq/L) | 0.16 ± 0.03a | 0.06 ± 0.01a | 0.05 ± 0.01a | 0.062 |
| Cu (meq/L) | 6.28 ± 1.45a | 7.01 ± 1.19a | 9.50 ± 2.70a | 0.613 |
| Zn (meq/L) | 13.11 ± 1.24a | 19.63 ± 3.17a | 20.82 ± 7.91a | 0.161 |
| Mn (meq/L) | 226.83 ± 29.94a | 412.04 ± 93.62a | 237.99 ± 68.92a | 0.139 |
| Ni (meq/L) | 30.06 ± 4.45a | 35.49 ± 5.29a | 41.63 ± 16.73a | 0.530 |
| Pb (meq/L) | 0.99 ± 0.28a | 0.40 ± 0.22a | 1.19 ± 0.59a | 0.363 |
Values are mean ± standard errors. EC: electrical conductivity. Superscript letters within each row showed significant variation at p < 0.05 (Kruskal-Wallis’s test) at df = 2. ∗ significant at p < 0.05.
Figure 4Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA) shows the correlation between the soil factors (arrows) and dominant, codominant and important associated species (red triangles) representing the three vegetation clusters (A, B and C). EC: electric conductivity. The species are Hal per: Halopeplis perfoliata, Su aver: Suaeda vermiculata, Hal sal: Haloxylon salicornicum, Sal dru: Salsola drummondii, Lim axi: Limonium axillare, Zyg man: Zygophyllum mandaville, Ana lac: Anabasis lachnantha, Zyg qat: Zygophyllum qatarense, Hel bac: Heliotropium bacciferum, Pan tur: Panicum turgidum, Cyp con: Cyperus conglomeratus, Pen div: Pennisetum divisum, Ast sie: Astragalus sieberi, Art mac: Arthrocnemum macrostachyum, Ael lag: Aeluropus lagopoides, Cre cri: Cressa cretica, Jun rig: Juncus rigidus, Lep pyr: Leptadenia pyrotechnica.