Literature DB >> 35879987

Pareto domain: an invaluable source of process information.

Geraldine Cáceres Sepúlveda1, Silvia Ochoa2, Jules Thibault1.   

Abstract

Due to the highly competitive market and increasingly stringent environmental regulations, it is paramount to operate chemical processes at their optimal point. In a typical process, there are usually many process variables (decision variables) that need to be selected in order to achieve a set of optimal objectives for which the process will be considered to operate optimally. Because some of the objectives are often contradictory, Multi-objective optimization (MOO) can be used to find a suitable trade-off among all objectives that will satisfy the decision maker. The first step is to circumscribe a well-defined Pareto domain, corresponding to the portion of the solution domain comprised of a large number of non-dominated solutions. The second step is to rank all Pareto-optimal solutions based on some preferences of an expert of the process, this step being performed using visualization tools and/or a ranking algorithm. The last step is to implement the best solution to operate the process optimally. In this paper, after reviewing the main methods to solve MOO problems and to select the best Pareto-optimal solution, four simple MOO problems will be solved to clearly demonstrate the wealth of information on a given process that can be obtained from the MOO instead of a single aggregate objective. The four optimization case studies are the design of a PI controller, an SO2 to SO3 reactor, a distillation column and an acrolein reactor. Results of these optimization case studies show the benefit of generating and using the Pareto domain to gain a deeper understanding of the underlying relationships between the various process variables and performance objectives.
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.

Entities:  

Keywords:  decision variables; objective functions; pareto domain; process optimization

Year:  2020        PMID: 35879987      PMCID: PMC9028026          DOI: 10.1515/cppm-2020-0012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Prod Process Model        ISSN: 1934-2659


  6 in total

1.  Combining convergence and diversity in evolutionary multiobjective optimization.

Authors:  Marco Laumanns; Lothar Thiele; Kalyanmoy Deb; Eckart Zitzler
Journal:  Evol Comput       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.277

2.  Multicriteria optimization of gluconic acid production using net flow.

Authors:  H Halsall-Whitney; D Taylor; J Thibault
Journal:  Bioprocess Biosyst Eng       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  Rolling the dice: multidimensional visual exploration using scatterplot matrix navigation.

Authors:  Niklas Elmqvist; Pierre Dragicevic; Jean-Daniel Fekete
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.579

4.  Diversity Assessment in Many-Objective Optimization.

Authors:  Handing Wang; Yaochu Jin; Xin Yao
Journal:  IEEE Trans Cybern       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 11.448

5.  A tutorial on multiobjective optimization: fundamentals and evolutionary methods.

Authors:  Michael T M Emmerich; André H Deutz
Journal:  Nat Comput       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 1.690

6.  A Pareto approach to resolve the conflict between information gain and experimental costs: Multiple-criteria design of carbon labeling experiments.

Authors:  Katharina Nöh; Sebastian Niedenführ; Martin Beyß; Wolfgang Wiechert
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 4.475

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.