| Literature DB >> 35879704 |
Lihong Zeng1, Qirong Chen2, Sisi Fan3, Qifeng Yi4, Wenhong An5, Huan Liu4, Wei Hua1, Rong Huang4, Hui Huang6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Improving the professional identity of nursing intern is significant for enhancing the number of new registered nurses and easing the shortage of nursing personnel. The clinical internship is a key period for the formulation of professional identity. However, we know little about the factors influencing the nursing interns' professional identity during clinical internship. Therefore, this study explore the influencing factors of nursing interns' professional identity during clinical internship. This study will provide evidence and suggestions for generating effective strategies contributing to professional identity improvement of nursing interns.Entities:
Keywords: Clinical internship; Nursing interns; Professional identity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35879704 PMCID: PMC9310353 DOI: 10.1186/s12912-022-00983-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Nurs ISSN: 1472-6955
Demographic characteristics and single factor analysis of Professional Identity in clinic nursing students (N = 389)
| Variables | Professional Identity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professional identity | 4.02 ± 0.63 | |||
| Gender | ||||
| Male | 38 (9.55) | 4.02 ± 0.10 | 0.30 | 0.58 |
| Female | 360 (90.45) | 4.02 ± 0.03 | ||
| Education level | ||||
| Diploma level | 208 (52.26) | 4.16 ± 0.04 | 5.23 | 0.02 |
| Baccalaureate level | 190 (47.74) | 3.87 ± 0.05 | ||
| Only child in family | ||||
| Yes | 105 (26.38) | 3.88 ± 0.07 | 7.85 | 0.01 |
| No | 293 (73.62) | 4.07 ± 0.03 | ||
| Residential status | ||||
| Rural | 187 (46.98) | 4.16 ± 0.04 | 10.60 | 0.00 |
| Urban | 211 (53.02) | 3.87 ± 0.05 | ||
| First major choice | ||||
| Yes | 276 (69.35) | 4.15 ± 0.04 | 4.44 | 0.04 |
| No | 122 (30.65) | 3.73 ± 0.06 | ||
| Academic grade in school | ||||
| Excellent | 197 (49.50) | 4.08 ± 0.04 | 2.02 | 0.13 |
| Medium | 188 (47.24) | 3.97 ± 0.05 | ||
| Poor | 13 (3.26) | 3.82 ± 0.16 | ||
| School level | ||||
| Junior college | 208 (52.26) | 4.16 ± 0.04 | 15.35 | 0.00 |
| Second level university | 92 (23.12) | 4.01 ± 0.06 | ||
| First level university | 98 (24.62) | 3.74 ± 0.07 | ||
Correlation between nursing students’ professional identity and dimensions of the environment evaluation scale for clinical nursing internship
| Professional identity | Teaching method | Teacher capacity | Learning opportunities | Interpersonal relationships | Working atmosphere | Organizational support | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Professional identity | 1 | 0.34** | 0.40** | 0.35** | 0.39** | 0.41** | 0.30** |
| Teaching method | 1 | 0.77** | 0.71** | 0.61** | 0.68** | 0.62** | |
| Teacher capacity | 1 | 0.70** | 0.73** | 0.76** | 0.62** | ||
| Learning opportunities | 1 | 0.73** | 0.74** | 0.72** | |||
| Interpersonal relationships | 1 | 0.85** | 0.70** | ||||
| Working atmosphere | 1 | 0.72** | |||||
| Organizational support | 1 |
Results of the multiple linear regression analysis for predicting nursing students’ professional identity
| Variables | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constant | 2.65 | 0.27 | 9.73 | 0.00 | |
| Demographic characteristics | |||||
| Residential status | 0.15 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 2.72 | 0.01 |
| Education | −0.15 | 0.06 | −0.12 | −2.60 | 0.01 |
| First major choice | −0.31 | 0.06 | −0.23 | −5.05 | 0.00 |
| Nursing clinical learning environment | |||||
| Working atmosphere | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.22 | 3.31 | 0.00 |
| Teacher capacity | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.17 | 2.52 | 0.01 |
R = 0.52, R = 0.27, Adjusted R = 0.26, P < 0.001