Literature DB >> 35878507

Heterologous booster COVID-19 vaccination elicited potent immune responses in HCWs.

Neşe Saltoğlu1, Harika Öykü Dinç2, İlker İnanç Balkan1, Günay Can3, Doğukan Özbey4, Ayşe Nur Beytur1, Elif Keskin4, Beyhan Budak1, Okan Aydoğan5, Bilgül Mete1, Rıdvan Karaali1, Sevgi Ergin4, Bekir Kocazeybek6.   

Abstract

The objective of our study was to evaluate the antibody responses of health care workers (HCWs) who were vaccinated with booster dose BNT162b2 6 months after 2 doses of the CoronoVac vaccine. The study included 318 HCWs vaccinated with inactive CoronaVac SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in 2 doses. Anti-spike/RBD IgG levels were measured immediately before and 1 month after the booster dose. In the sixth month after CoronaVac vaccination, the median of antibody levels of 1212.02 AU/ML, while it was 9283 AU/mL after BNT162b2 vaccination. IgG antibody titers of over 1050 AU/mL (which is equivalent to 1:80 dilution in the plaque reduction neutralization test) were detected in HCWs 15.09% and 97.8%, respectively. Our results showed that antibody titers increased 8-fold after the booster dose. We believe that the administration of the mRNA vaccine as a booster dose can provide more effective protection against COVID-19 infection, especially in individuals with risk factors.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibody; BNT162b2; COVID-19; CoronaVac; Vaccine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35878507      PMCID: PMC9247219          DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0732-8893            Impact factor:   2.983


Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected health care systems around the globe [Dong et al., 2020,Guan et al., 2020]. Although the effectiveness of vaccines decreases due to diminishing antibody titers over time and escape mechanisms of variants from the immune system, the role of vaccines in the fight against the pandemic cannot be denied [(Planas et al., 2021)]. However, reduced antibody responses are observed over time in individuals who have been vaccinated against COVID-19 [(Widge et al., 2020)]. Due to emerging variants of concern, especially Delta and Omicron, vaccination strategies have changed worldwide. There is significant international interest in heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination to more robust immune response and longer-term protection despite its immunogenicity and reactogenicity being controversial. In light of changing recommendations regarding the use of the vaccines, several countries are advising that individuals should now receive an alternative prime-boost vaccine as their booster dose, most commonly mRNA vaccines such as the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 vaccine [(Shaw et al., 2021)]. As of November 4, 2021, the Ministry of Health recommended homologous or heterologous prime-boost at least 3 months after the last dose to people who vaccinated 2 doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccine [(n.d.)]. Despite the real-life data on the immunogenicity of mRNA vaccines as a booster after inactive vaccines being limited, there is an urgent need to determine the humoral responses following heterologous vaccination. This study aimed to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 IgG response before and after heterologous vaccination (CoronaVac/BNT162b2) in health care workers (HCWs).

Materials and methods

The study is a prospective, single-center, and observational cohort study. The study cohort comprised 620 HCWs who were vaccinated with 2 doses of inactivated CoronaVac (Sinovac Life Sciences, Beijing, China) and who preferred the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine as a prime-boost. Peripheral blood samples were obtained shortly before and 28 days after the BNT162b2 vaccination upon their informed consent. Those who's not available for blood sampling on the 28th day of prime-boost vaccination were excluded from the study. The samples were stored in microtubes at −20°C until assayed. On the assay day, serum samples were first brought to +4°C and then to room temperature (+18°C, +25°C) and made ready for use.

Immuno-serological tests

Chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) method was used to detect SARS-CoV-2 IgG titers (SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant antibody test kit; Abbott Laboratories, Chicago, USA), demonstrating the quantity of neutralizing antibodies against the receptor-binding region (RBD) of the spike protein S1 subunit of SARS-CoV-2. The antibody results of the studied sera were evaluated as Arbitrary Unit/mL (AU/mL). The antibody concentrations obtained in AU/mL were multiplied by the correlation coefficient of 0.142 and converted to the ‘‘Binding Antibody Unit (BAU/mL)” in the WHO's International Standard for Anti-SARS-CoV- 2 immunoglobulins [(n.d.)]. Accordingly, 50 AU/mL or 7.1 BAU/mL and above concentrations were considered positive. This test has been reported to be 100% compatible with the plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT), and a concentration of 1050 AU/mL was associated with a 1:80 dilution of PRNT [(n.d.)].

Statistical analysis

The Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) software version 21 (IBM Corp.; Armonk, NY) was used to evaluate the data. Qualitative data are presented as numbers and percentages, and quantitative data are presented as median and IQR25-75. χ2 test and Fisher's exact test were used in the evaluation of qualitative data, Student's t-test, Mann Whitney U test, and Kruskal Wallis test were used in the comparison of quantitative data. Spearman analysis was used for the correlation analysis, and the P < 0.05 value was considered significant in all analyses.

Results

HCWs (n = 318) in the study had a mean age of 40.31 ± 11.92 years (range between 21−66) of whom 186 were female (58.5%), and 132 (41.5%) were male. Of the 60 participants with prior history of COVID-19 at least 4 months ago, 23 (45.9%) were male, and 37 (54.1%) were female, with a mean age of 38.1 ± 11.9 years. Of the infection-naïve group, 110 (42.63%) were male, 148 (57.36%) were female, and the mean age was 40.87 ± 11.89. No significant difference was detected between SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity in individuals according to gender, comorbidities, and blood groups (P > 0.05). SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity was found to be significantly higher in the group under 40 years of age compared to the group aged 40 years and over (P = 0.035). SARS-CoV-2 IgG seropositivity was also significantly higher in participants with a prior history of COVID-19 (P = 0.035) (Table 1 ).
Table 1

Demographic and clinical data according to SARS-COV-2 IgG seropositivity.

<50 AU/mL≥50 AU/mLP
n (%)n (%)
Gender
 Male10 (7,6)122 (92,4)0,207
 Female8 (4,3)178 (95,7)
Age
 <404 (2,7)143 (97,3)0,035*
 ≥4014 (8,2)157 (91,8)
Body-Mass Index (BMI)
 Normal9 (6,0)141 (94,0)0,939
 Overweight6 (5,2)109 (94,8)
 Obese3 (6,5)43 (93,5)
Department
 Basic Medical Sciences0 (0,0)9 (100,0)0,844
 Internal Medical Sciences7 (8,3)77 (91,7)
 Surgical Medical Sciences3 (7,5)37 (92,5)
 Administrative Staff2 (7,1)26 (92,9)
Allergy
 Absent17 (5,6)285 (94,4)0,568
 Present1 (7,1)13 (92,9)
Autoimmune Disorder
 Absent17 (5,5)292 (94,5)0,398
 Present1 (12,5)7 (87,5)
Neurological Disorder
 Absent18 (5,7)298 (94,3)-
 Present0 (0)0 (0)
Malignity
 Absent17 (5,4)298 (94,6)0,111
 Present1 (50)1 (50)
Diabetes Mellitus (DM)
 Absent17 (5,6)286 (94,4)0,567
 Present1 (7,1)13 (92,9)
Hypertension (HT)
 Absent17 (5,7)279 (94,3)1,000
 Present1 (4,8)20 (95,2)
Hypothyroidism
 Absent18 (5,9)286 (94,1)1,000 f
 Present0 (0,0)13 (100,0)
Chronic Cardiovascular Disease
 Absent18 (5,8)293 (94,2)1,000 f
 Present0 (0,0)5 (100,0)
Chronic Lung Disease
 Absent18 (5,7)299 (94,3)-
 Present0 (0,0)0 (0,0)
Prior History of COVID-19
 Absent18 (7,0)240 (93,0)0,035*
 Present0 (0,0)60 (100,0)
Blood Type
 O (Neg or Pos)5 (5,6)85 (94,4)0,949
 A (Neg or Pos)9 (6,5)129 (93,5)
 B (Neg or Pos)2 (3,9)49 (96,1)
 AB (Neg or Pos)2 (6,7)28 (93,3)
Demographic and clinical data according to SARS-COV-2 IgG seropositivity. In the 6th month after CoronaVac vaccination, the median antibody level of 1212.02 AU/ML, while it was 9283 AU/mL after BNT162b2 vaccination. When the median antibody titers were compared before and after the third dose, a significantly higher antibody titer was found after the booster dose (P < 0.0001) (Table 2 ). The rate of IgG antibody titers above 1050 AU/mL (equivalent to 1:80 dilution in the plaque reduction neutralization test) before the third dose was 15.09%, while it was 97.8% after the third dose.
Table 2

SARS-CoV-2 IgG median levels in blood samples taken before and after the booster dose from HCWs who participated in the study.

Before booster dose of BNT162b2 Median (%25−75 IQR)After booster dose of BNT162b2 Median (%25−75 IQR)P
SARS-CoV-2 IgG, AU/mL1212.02 (123.5−556.5)9283.4 (6196.9−14264.9)0,000*
SARS-CoV-2 IgG median levels in blood samples taken before and after the booster dose from HCWs who participated in the study. The evaluated median antibody titers in terms of gender, age, and BMI, did not differ significantly in before and after the booster dose (P > 0.05) (Table 3 ). A significant difference was detected between median antibody titers in HCWs who have hypothyroidism when evaluated for comorbidities (P < 0.05) (Table 3). The median antibody titer was found to be significantly higher in individuals without cardiovascular disease than in patients with cardiovascular disease (P < 0.05). Median antibody titers were significantly higher in patients with a history of COVID-19 prior to the booster dose (P < 0.001). After the booster dose, there was no significant difference between the median antibody titers in the participants according to the comorbidities (P > 0.05) (Table 3).
Table 3

Evaluation of antibody titers in HCWs according to demographic and clinical data before and after the booster dose.

Before booster dose of BNT162b2After booster dose of BNT162b2
Median (IQR 25%IQR 75%)PMedian (IQR 25%IQR 75%)P

Gender
 MaleFemale210,20 (117,30−530,90)219,05 (127,95−615,575)0,4739419,70 (5681,90−14264,90)9275,05 (6488,45−14134,60)0,727
Age
 <40≥40228,00 (129,90−481,30)207,50 (121,90−695,00)0,6109165,60 (6491,40−14067,00)9551,00 (5502,20−14385,00)0,883
Body Mass Index (BMI)
 NormalOverweightObese207,00 (122,50−485,20)247,00 (134,30−643,10)171,40 (114,95−348,375)0,2429129,65 (6007,75−14324,55)9235,70 (6504,50−14078,00)11055,55 (6505,30−16010,58)0,606
Autoimmune Disorder
 AbsentPresent216,90 (123,35−542,45)435,60 (124,73−1583,530,6459333,70 (6262,45−14284,65)8445,00 (6064,55−12433,40)0,815
Malignity
 AbsentPresent221,20 (123,80−556,50)--9333,70 (6298,90−14264,90)--
Allergy
 AbsentPresent213,55 (123,08−532,83)304,85 (138,05−800,68)0,5689376,70 (6325,25−14274,78)7095,30 (4271,60−13310,50)0,267
Diabetes Mellitus
 AbsentPresent221,20 (123,20−546,30)165,50 (121,95−642,93)0,6589329,10 (6298,90−14236,80)9311,25 (5732,18−15500,80)0,860
Hypertension
 AbsentPresent227,50 (123,35−571,43)146,10 (118,90−325,15)0,1529331,40 (6302,98−14295,53)8828,70 (4507,90−13397,00)0,612
Hypothyroidism
 AbsentPresent208,65 (122,63−552,30)442,40 (191,95−1585,20)0,035*9376,70 (6206,05−14257,88)8739,20 (6595,55−15228,20)0,938
Chronic Cardiovascular Disease
 AbsentPresent224,70 (124,10−556,50)110,80 (77,25−130,75)0,018*9329,10 (6298,90−14264,90)9093,70 (4582,20−11087,75)0,389
Other Conditions
 AbsentPresent226,15 (125,75−554,85)189,30 (94,25−603,75)0,2829251,20 (6325,25−14274,78)11254,30 (5447,80−14646,35)0,894
Prior History of COVID-19
 AbsentPresent184,60 (115,45−354,45)1162,80 (325,10−2713,95)*<0,0019860,90 (6343,90−14975,80)8783,95 (5683,50−11703,80)0,138
Evaluation of antibody titers in HCWs according to demographic and clinical data before and after the booster dose.

Discussion

In this study, antibody responses were evaluated in HCWs vaccinated with 2 doses of CoronaVac (Sinovac) who were vaccinated with mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) as a booster dose. We demonstrated booster dose of BNT162b2 mRNA vaccines leads to enhanced humoral immune responses in participants after 2 doses of inactivated vaccine. Due to the stimulation of both humoral and cell-mediated immunity, it is expected that higher antibody titers will be detected in individuals with inactivated vaccines and a history of COVID-19 [(Dinc et al., 2022)]. Heterologous prime-boost has been recommended for may offer immunologic advantages to extend the breadth and longevity of protection provided by the currently available vaccines [(Atmar et al., 2022)]. In Turkey, an optional third dose of the mRNA vaccine was administered to health personnel. In our study, an approximately 8-fold increase in median antibody titers was observed after heterologous booster vaccination with BNT162b2. However, unlike in health care workers who were vaccinated with 2 doses of CoronaVac, similar results were obtained between titers between subjects with and without a history of COVID-19 in this study. We believe that the differences between antibody titers in these studies result from the different vaccines, such as inactivated and mRNA vaccines, and their stimulation mechanism of the immunity [(Dinc et al., 2022)]. As the debate over booster vaccines heats up, concerns are mounting about the duration of vaccine-based immunity. Some studies showed that the emergence of new variants of concern has resulted in the reduced effectiveness of available vaccines against COVID-19 [[14], [11], [12], [13]]. Similarly, studies from Israel reported that after 2 doses of BNT162b2, vaccine efficacy and antibody titers reduced within 6 months [[16], [15]]. Hence, many countries administered new strategies named mix-and-match. The mix-and-match strategy, using heterologous vaccines in the first, second, third doses, might successfully solve the efficacy struggles. Moreover, this strategy has been associated with higher cellular and humoral immune responses without significantly increasing the adverse reactions. A study reported from China showed that heterologous boosting with recombinant viral vector vaccine Convidecia (Ad5-nCov) elicited significantly increased mean titers of neutralizing antibody against SARS-CoV-2 than homologous boosting with CoronaVac in participants who had previously vaccinated 1 or 2 doses of CoronaVac. The study was suggested that heterologous boosting with Convidecia following initial vaccination with CoronaVac is safe and more immunogenic than homologous boosting [(Li et al., 2022)]. Pérez-Then et al. [(Pérez-Then et al., 2022)] reported that a CoronaVac prime vaccination of 2 doses followed by a BNT162b2 booster induces elevated virus-specific antibody levels and potent neutralization activity against the ancestral virus (wild-type) and the Delta variant, resembling the titers obtained after 2 doses of mRNA vaccines. In a study reported from Turkey, a decrease in antibody titers was found third month of vaccination with CoronaVac and an increase in antibody titers with both homologous and heterologous booster doses administered 4.5 months later [(Çağlayan et al., 2022)]. In addition, the administration of the BNT162b2 as a heterologous booster had a significant increase in antibody response compared to the administration of a homologous booster with CoronaVac. According to the method we used in the study IgG antibody titers of over 1050 AU/mL which is equivalent to 1:80 dilution in the plaque reduction neutralization test were detected in is quite high (97.8%) after the booster dose. While according to our study showed a significant increase in antibody titers after the heterologous vaccination, data are based on a short follow-up period. EMA and ECDC stated that 6 months after heterologous vaccination might be a decrease in protection against symptomatic infection [(n.d.)]. Concordantly, an extended follow-up period may offer a new perspective on booster dose intervals. Real-life data regarding SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies following inactivated COVID-19 vaccine are limited. IgG positivity after 2 doses of inactivated vaccination is reported to be between 77.3% and 99.4% [Dinc et al., 2022, [22], [23], [21]]. Especially, the long-term protection of the inactivated vaccine is uncertain. In this study, antibody titers were assessed sixth month of 1 dose of mRNA booster in those vaccinated with 2 doses of CoronaVac. This study presents real-life data regarding antibody levels changes with heterologous mRNA booster 6 months after 2 doses of the inactivated CoronaVac vaccine. We believe that the study will make a significant contribution to the literature. In previous studies reported from our hospital, antibody titers were decreased third month after administering 2 doses of CoronaVac compared to the first month [(Balkan et al., 2022)]. We only included HCWs who preferred the mRNA-BNT162b2 vaccine over CoronaVac as a booster dose, and this may have caused bias. In addition, although the humoral immune responses were assessed with the SARS-CoV-II IgG test, which is 100% compatible with PRNT, the specific T-cell responses could not be assessed. This study is crucial in that showed a parallel increase in antibody titers when an mRNA booster is administered 6 months after the administration of 2 doses of CoronaVac in HCWs with or without a prior history of COVID-19. Our results showed that the heterologous prime-boost regimen was safe and significantly immunogenic. We believe that the administration of the mRNA vaccine as a booster dose can provide more effective protection against COVID-19 infection, especially in individuals with risk factors.

Ethics Approval

This study was approved by the Republic of Turkey Ministry of Health General Directorate of Health Services Scientific Research Studies Commission (Date: September 18, 2021), Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Scientific Research and Evaluation Commission (Date: February 17, 2022, and Number: 314719), and Bezmialem Vakıf University Clinical Research Ethics Committee approval (Date: April 5, 2022).

Data Sharing Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Funding

The authors declare that this study has been supported by IU-Cerrahpaşa Scientific Research Projects Unit (Project ID: 35900).

Author Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material and method preparation were performed by N.S, İ.İ.B., G.C., S.E., B.K. Data collection and analysis were performed by H.Ö.D., D.Ö., B.M., R.K., A.N.B, E.K., O.A. B.B. Statistical analysis and interpretation were performed by G.C. The first draft of the manuscript was written by N.S. and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
  20 in total

1.  Effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 Vaccine 6 Months after Vaccination among Patients in Large Health Maintenance Organization, Israel.

Authors:  Jennifer Kertes; Sharon Baruch Gez; Yaki Saciuk; Lia Supino-Rosin; Naama Shamir Stein; Miri Mizrahi-Reuveni; Anat E Zohar
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 6.883

2.  Heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccination: initial reactogenicity data.

Authors:  Robert H Shaw; Arabella Stuart; Melanie Greenland; Xinxue Liu; Jonathan S Nguyen Van-Tam; Matthew D Snape
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Intensified antibody response elicited by boost suggests immune memory in individuals administered two doses of SARS-CoV-2 inactivated vaccine.

Authors:  Yun Liao; Ying Zhang; Heng Zhao; Jing Pu; Zhimei Zhao; Dandan Li; Shengtao Fan; Li Yu; Xingli Xu; Lichun Wang; Guorun Jiang; Longding Liu; Qihan Li
Journal:  Emerg Microbes Infect       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 7.163

4.  Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Guan; Zheng-Yi Ni; Yu Hu; Wen-Hua Liang; Chun-Quan Ou; Jian-Xing He; Lei Liu; Hong Shan; Chun-Liang Lei; David S C Hui; Bin Du; Lan-Juan Li; Guang Zeng; Kwok-Yung Yuen; Ru-Chong Chen; Chun-Li Tang; Tao Wang; Ping-Yan Chen; Jie Xiang; Shi-Yue Li; Jin-Lin Wang; Zi-Jing Liang; Yi-Xiang Peng; Li Wei; Yong Liu; Ya-Hua Hu; Peng Peng; Jian-Ming Wang; Ji-Yang Liu; Zhong Chen; Gang Li; Zhi-Jian Zheng; Shao-Qin Qiu; Jie Luo; Chang-Jiang Ye; Shao-Yong Zhu; Nan-Shan Zhong
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Homologous and Heterologous Covid-19 Booster Vaccinations.

Authors:  Robert L Atmar; Kirsten E Lyke; Meagan E Deming; Lisa A Jackson; Angela R Branche; Hana M El Sahly; Christina A Rostad; Judith M Martin; Christine Johnston; Richard E Rupp; Mark J Mulligan; Rebecca C Brady; Robert W Frenck; Martín Bäcker; Angelica C Kottkamp; Tara M Babu; Kumaravel Rajakumar; Srilatha Edupuganti; David Dobrzynski; Rhea N Coler; Christine M Posavad; Janet I Archer; Sonja Crandon; Seema U Nayak; Daniel Szydlo; Jillian A Zemanek; Clara P Dominguez Islas; Elizabeth R Brown; Mehul S Suthar; M Juliana McElrath; Adrian B McDermott; Sarah E O'Connell; David C Montefiori; Amanda Eaton; Kathleen M Neuzil; David S Stephens; Paul C Roberts; John H Beigel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 176.079

6.  Waning immunity to inactive SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in healthcare workers: booster required.

Authors:  İlker İnanc Balkan; Harika Oyku Dinc; Gunay Can; Rıdvan Karaali; Dogukan Ozbey; Bilge Caglar; Ayşe Nur Beytur; Elif Keskin; Beyhan Budak; Okan Aydogan; Bilgül Mete; Sevgi Ergin; Bekir Kocazeybek; Nese Saltoglu
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time.

Authors:  Ensheng Dong; Hongru Du; Lauren Gardner
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 25.071

8.  Comparative immunogenicity of mRNA and inactivated vaccines against COVID-19.

Authors:  Wey Wen Lim; Loretta Mak; Gabriel M Leung; Benjamin J Cowling; Malik Peiris
Journal:  Lancet Microbe       Date:  2021-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.