| Literature DB >> 35877719 |
Emma P Kozlovskaya1, Aleksandr M Popov1, Olga N Styshova1, Aleksey I Vakhrushev1, Tatyana A Rutckova1, Anna B Podvolotskaya2, Ludmila A Tekutyeva2,3.
Abstract
The global spread of the metabolic syndrome, oncological and viral diseases forces researchers to pay increased attention to the secondary metabolites of marine hydrobionts, which often have a high therapeutic potential in the treatment of these pathologies and are effective components of functional food. The flavone luteolin (LT), as one of the most widely distributed and studied plant metabolites, is distinguished by a diverse spectrum of biological activity and a pleiotropic nature of the mechanism of action at the molecular, cellular and organismal levels. However, there is still practically no information on the spectrum of biological activity of its sulfated derivatives, which are widely represented in seagrasses of the genus Zostera. In the present work, a comparative study of the pharmacological properties of LT and its 7,3'-disulfate was carried out with a brief analysis of the special role of sulfation in the pharmacological activity of flavonoids.Entities:
Keywords: flavonoids; luteolin (LT); luteolin 7,3′-disulfate (DSL); pharmacological activity; sulfated flavonoids
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35877719 PMCID: PMC9318810 DOI: 10.3390/md20070426
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 6.085
Figure 1Structural formulas of luteolin (LT) (a) and luteolin 7,3′-disulfate (DSL) (b).
Figure 2Comparative study of the protective activity of bioflavonoids against linoleic acid peroxidation. The horizontal axis indicates substances and their concentrations (μM), and the vertical axis indicates the inhibition of linoleic acid peroxidation, expressed as % of the control. The average value of the optical density in the control is 0.242 ± 0.016 (100%). The results of three experiments (1–10 µmol) performed in five replicates are presented as m ± SE (Standard Error). Abbreviations: DHAq—dihydroquercetin; LT—luteolin; DSL—luteolin 7,3′-disulfate; RA—rosmarinic acid.
Biochemical indicators of blood plasma of experimental animals with hepatitis.
| Substance/Animal Group | Intoxication | TBARs | Bilirubin | ALT | AST |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intact | − | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 32.23 ± 5.25 | 0.90 ± 0.02 | 0.17 ± 0.01 |
| CCl4 | + | 2.00 ± 0.19 | 170.09 ± 14.87 | 3.37 ± 0.19 | 4.84 ± 0.80 |
| DSL | + | 0.64 ± 0.01 | 70.18 ± 2.21 | 2.82 ± 0.10 | 3.77 ± 1.10 |
| LT | + | 1.20 ± 0.18 | 112.93 ± 18.04 | 3.58 ± 1.06 | 2.58 ± 1.20 |
Results are presented as m ± SD (Standard Deviation). Abbreviations: CCI4—carbon tetrachloride; TBARs—thiobarbituric acid-reactive products; ALT—alanine aminotransferase; AST—aspartate aminotransferase; LT—luteolin; DSL—luteolin 7,3′-disulfate.
Biochemical parameters of blood plasma of experimental animals with alloxan diabetes.
| Substance/Animal Group | Relative Weight of the Pancreas (%) | GTT | TBARs | ALT | AST | Bilirubin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intact | 8.3 ± 0.12 * | 6.93 ± 0.73 | 1.4 ± 0.03 | 62.4 ± 2.6 * | 145.0 ± 5.9 * | 44.5 ± 2.6 * |
| (−) control | 7.2 ± 0.15 | 17.5 ± 1.25 | 1.6 ± 0.18 | 67.6 ± 1.5 | 164.6 ± 13.7 | 56.6 ± 1.8 |
| DSL (0.1 mg/kg) | 7.4 ± 0.18 * | 15.7 ± 4.3 | 0.7 ± 0.05 | 174.7 ± 59.8 * | 137.0 ± 11.8 * | 34.5 ± 1.3 * |
| DSL (0.2 mg/kg) | 7.6 ± 0.17 * | 14.9 ± 1.85 * | 0.5 ± 0.04 | 83.2 ± 2.6 * | 150.9 ± 7.8 * | 45.2 ± 1.9 * |
| DSL (0.5 mg/kg) | 8.7 ± 0.04 * | 13.8 ± 3.6 * | 0.3 ± 0.05 | 78.0 ± 1.3 * | 145.0 ± 7.1 * | 61.5 ± 5.6 |
| LT (0.5 mg/kg) | 8.7 ± 0.10 * | 15.0 ± 5.6 | 1.4 ± 0.21 | 119.6 ± 7.3 * | 152.9 ± 15.7 | 60.0 ± 3.2 * |
| LT (1.0 mg/kg) | 8.2 ± 0.09 * | 13.5 ± 1.9 * | 1.2 ± 0.02 | 83.2 ± 15.6 * | 152.8 ± 2.1 * | 55.8 ± 2.2 |
| LT (2.0 mg/kg) | 7.7 ± 0.15 * | 12.9 ± 5.2 * | 0.6 ± 0.03 | 161.2 ± 28.6 * | 147.5 ± 0.9 * | 53.2 ± 1.0 * |
| Glibenclamide | 1.0 ± 0.13 * | 14.6 ± 0.57 * | 0.5 ± 0.01 | 85.8 ± 5.2 * | 135.2 ± 31.4 * | 47.9 ± 2.1 * |
* significant difference from the (−) control group at p < 0.05. Abbreviations: GTT—glucose tolerance test; TBARs—thiobarbituric acid-reactive products; ALT—alanine aminotransferase; AST—aspartate aminotransferase; LT—luteolin; DSL—luteolin 7,3′-disulfate.
Biochemical parameters of blood plasma of experimental animals in the treatment of hyperlipidemia.
| Substance/Animal Group | TG | Ch (mol/L) | HDL (mol/L) | VLDL (mol/L) | MDA (µmol/L) | ALT (µmol/L) | AST (µmol/L) | Bilirubin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (−) control | 4.9 ± 0.20 | 4.1 ± 0.96 | 2.6 ± 0.32 * | 4.5 ± 0.11 | 2.8 ± 0.10 | 52.0 ± 7.8 | 162.3 ± 14.8 | 25.1 ± 5.8 |
| DSL (0.1 mg/kg) | 4.1 ± 0.11 | 3.9 ± 0.05 | 2.5 ± 0.97 | 4.0 ± 0.24 | 1.7 ± 0.98 * | 44.2 ± 7.8 * | 159.3 ± 11.8 | 27.9 ± 2.3 |
| DSL (1 mg/kg) | 4.1 ± 0.09 * | 3.9 ± 0.12 * | 2.6 ± 0.05 | 3.0 ± 1.20 | 0.9 ± 0.01 * | 44.2 ± 2.6 * | 179.9 ± 11.8 * | 25.4 ± 1.4 |
| LT (0.1 mg/kg) | 3.3 ± 0.21 * | 2.9 ± 0.08 | 2.2 ± 0.0 * | 3.7 ± 0.02 * | 1.1 ± 0.97 * | 44.2 ± 7.8 | 159.3 ± 5.9 | 30.7 ± 2.2 * |
| LT (1 mg/kg) | 3.8 ± 0.12 * | 3.2 ± 0.15 | 1.9 ± 0.09 | 3.5 ± 0.55 * | 1.8 ± 0.12 * | 44.2 ± 15.6 | 188.9 ± 2.9 * | 23.0 ± 2.8 |
| LT (10 mg/kg) | 4.3 ± 1.03 | 3.7 ± 0.77 | 2.09 ± 0.01 | 4.0 ± 0.98 * | 1.3 ± 0.03 * | 41.6 ± 2.6 * | 162.5 ± 10.8 | 19.9 ± 1.1 * |
* significant difference from the (−) control group at p < 0.05. Abbreviations: TG—triglycerides; Ch—cholesterol; HDL—cholesterol of high-density lipoproteins; VLDL—cholesterol of very-low-density lipoproteins; MDA—malondialdehyde; ALT—alanine aminotransferase; AST—aspartate aminotransferase; LT—luteolin; DSL—luteolin 7,3′-disulfate.
Anti-inflammatory activity of the studied substances in the mouse carrageenan model.
| Substance/Animal Group | Inhibition of Inflammation (%) |
|---|---|
| Indomethacin | 21.06 ± 3.8 |
| RA | 8.97 ± 0.01 * |
| LT | 3.68 ± 0.2 * |
| DSL | 12.75 ± 0.01 * |
* significant difference from the animals treated with Indomethacin group at p < 0.01. Abbreviations: RA—rosmarinic acid; LT—luteolin; DSL—luteolin 7,3′-disulfate.
Therapeutic effect of the studied ointments on the process of wound healing.
| Substance/Animal Group | Treatment Time (day) | 7th Day | 9th Day | 14th Day |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wound Healing (% of Control) | Wound Healing (% of Control) | Wound Healing | ||
| Sinaflan (control) | 5 | 11.2 ± 4.5 | 64.17 ± 2.3 | 100 ± 1.4 * |
| Ointment | 5 | 70.7 ± 3.6 | 70.31 ± 2.3 | 99.43 ± 1.1 * |
| Ointment LT 1%, | 5 | 70.5 ± 5.2 | 65.8 ± 4.3 | 100 ± 0.98 * |
Results are presented as m ± SD (Standard Deviation). * significant difference from the control group at p < 0.05. Abbreviations: LT—luteolin; DSL—luteolin 7,3′-disulfate.
Comparative study of the antitumor activity of LT and DSL on the Ehrlich solid tumor.
| Substance/Animal Group | Dose (mg/kg)/Interval (h) × Number | ITG |
|---|---|---|
| CP | 20/24 × 5 | 58.69 ± 5.9 |
| LT | 1/24 × 10 | 66.13 ± 5.8 * |
| DSL | 1/24 × 10 | 52.77 ± 4.1 * |
| LT + CF | 1/24 × 10; 20/24 × 5 | 46.65 ± 10.6 * |
| DSL + CF | 1/24 × 10; 20/24 × 5 | 56.96 ± 9.7 |
* significant difference from the group of animals treated with CP at p < 0.05. Abbreviations: CP—cyclophosphamide, ITG—inhibition of tumor growth; LT—luteolin; DSL—luteolin 7,3′-disulfate.
Virus-inhibiting effects of LT and DSL in PEKC culture.
| Substance | Concentration (µg/mL) | lg TCID50/mL |
|---|---|---|
| LT * | 1.0 | 4.0 ± 0.4 |
| 0.1 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | |
| 0.01 | 3.0 ± 0.4 | |
| 0.001 | 1.0 ± 0.3 | |
| 0.0001 | 0 | |
| DSL * | 1.0 | 3.5 ± 0.4 |
| 0.1 | 3.5 ± 0.4 | |
| 0.01 | 4.0 ± 0.4 | |
| 0.001 | 3.0 ± 0.3 ** | |
| 0.0001 | 2.0 ± 0.3 ** | |
| control * | - | 7.5 ± 0.5 |
* all experiments performed in five replicates, ** significant difference from the control group at p < 0.05. Abbreviations: TCID50—fifty-percent tissue culture infective dose; LT—luteolin; DSL—luteolin 7,3′-disulfate.
Virus-inhibiting effect of various concentrations of luteolin and luteolin 7,3′-disulfate in experimental tick-borne encephalitis (TBE).
| Substance | Dose of the Drug (mg/kg) | Method of Drug Administration | 10th Day of Experience | 21st Day of Experience | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protection against Death (%) | Average Life Expectancy | Protection against Death (%) | Average Life Expectancy | |||
| Control | - | - | 0 | 8.2 ± 0.81 | 0 | 8.2 ± 0.81 |
| LT | 12.50 | intraperitoneally | 32.5 ± 9.6 | 8.8 ± 1.11 | 0 | |
| 6.25 | intraperitoneally | 35.0 ± 5.8 | 9.0 ± 1.03 | 0 | ||
| 3.25 | intraperitoneally | 20.0 ± 10.0 | 8.5 ± 0.56 | 0 | ||
| 25.00 | orally | 32.5 ± 5.0 | 9.0 ± 0.89 | 13.3 ± 5.8 | 10.5 ± 1.27 | |
| 12.50 | orally | 27.5 ± 5.0 | 9.0 ± 1.01 | 16.7 ± 5.8 | 11.4 ± 1.20 | |
| DSL | 12.50 | intraperitoneally | 17.5 ± 5.0 | 8.3 ± 1.15 | 0 | |
| 6.25 | intraperitoneally | 25.0 ± 5.8 | 9.0 ± 0.98 | 0 | ||
| 3.25 | intraperitoneally | 42.5 ± 9.6 * | 9.0 ± 1.07 | 0 | ||
| 25.00 | orally | 55.0 ± 5.8 * | 9.4 ± 0.87 | 21.7 ± 6.3 * | 12.6 ± 0.95 * | |
| 12.50 | orally | 57.5 ± 5.0 * | 9.4 ± 0.76 | 36.7 ± 5.8 * | 13.1 ± 0.86 * | |
* significant difference from the control group at p < 0.05. Abbreviations: LT—luteolin; DSL—luteolin 7,3′-disulfate.