| Literature DB >> 35877708 |
Savvas Giannis Mastropetros1, Eleni Koutra1, Mohammed Amouri2, Majda Aziza2, Sameh Samir Ali3,4, Michael Kornaros1.
Abstract
Microalgae have been recently recognized as a promising alternative for the effective treatment of anaerobic digestion effluents. However, to date, a widely applied microalgae-based process is still absent, due to several constraints mainly attributed to high ammonia concentrations and turbidity, both hindering microalgal growth. Within this scope, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the performance of two Chlorella strains, SAG 211-11b and a local Algerian isolate, under different nitrogen levels, upon ammonia stripping. The experiments were performed on cylindrical photobioreactors under controlled pH (7.8 ± 0.2) and temperature (25 ± 2 °C). Cultures were monitored for biomass production and substrate consumption. After sampling at the beginning of the stationary phase of growth (12th day) and after the maturation of the cells (24th day), an analysis of the produced biomass was conducted, in terms of its biochemical components. The local isolate grew better than C. vulgaris 211-11b, resulting in 1.43 mg L-1 biomass compared to 1.02 mg L-1 under 25 mg NH4-N L-1, while organic carbon and nutrient consumption varied between the two strains and different conditions. Concerning biomass quality, a high initial NH4-N concentration led to high protein content, while low nitrogen levels favored fatty acid (FA) accumulation, though the production of pigments was inhibited. In particular, the protein content of the final biomass was determined close to 45% of the dry weight in all experimental scenarios with adequate nitrogen, while proteins decreased, and the fatty acids approached 20% in the case of the local isolate grown on the substrate with the lowest initial ammonium nitrogen (25 mg NH4-N L-1). The novelty of the present work lies in the comparison of a microalga with industrial applications against a local isolate of the same species, which may prove to be even more robust and profitable.Entities:
Keywords: Chlorella vulgaris; ammonia stripping; biomass composition; bioremediation; digestate; fatty acid profile; local isolate; pigments
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35877708 PMCID: PMC9323968 DOI: 10.3390/md20070415
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 6.085
Digestate remediation, in terms of COD, NH4-N and TP removal, for each strain and initial ammonium nitrogen concentration examined. Data are presented for the beginning and the end of cultivation, as means ± SD (n = 2).
| (mg L−1) | 500 mg L−1 NH4-N | 250 mg L−1 NH4-N | 150 mg L−1 NH4-N | 25 mg L−1 NH4-N | 500 mg L−1 NH4-N | 330 mg L−1 NH4-N | 150 mg L−1 NH4-N | 25 mg L−1 NH4-N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COD | Initial conc. | 3195.7 ± 112.9 | 2616.5 ± 39.5 | 2783.7 ± 120.2 | 1510.0 ± 5.0 | 3493.6 ± 20.5 | 2837.0 ± 72.8 | 2297.0 ± 63.6 | 1176.1 ± 46.9 |
| Removal (%) | 90.8 ± 4.8 a | 82.2 ± 3.5 a | 86.5 ± 5.7 a | 57.5 ± 0.3 b | 89.6 ± 1.2 a | 84.6 ± 3.4 a | 85.2 ± 4.2 a | 58.2 ± 4.8 b | |
| NH4-N | Initial conc. | 499.0 ± 1.4 | 247.0 ± 1.4 | 145.0 ± 4.1 | 23.7 ± 0.4 | 487.0 ± 5.7 | 324.0 ± 9.9 | 147.8 ± 9.5 | 24.7 ± 0.3 |
| Removal (%) | 19.7 ± 0.8 e | 39.1 ± 3.0 d | 67.2 ± 5.4 b,c | 96.2 ± 2.7 a | 39.7 ± 2.3 d | 50.5 ± 3.6 c,d | 81.9 ± 11.1 a,b | 98.4 ± 1.7 a | |
| TP | Initial conc. | 9.2 ± 0.5 | 7.8 ± 0.3 | 7.7 ± 0.2 | 12.6 ± 0.1 | 12.9 ± 1.0 | 11.1 ± 1.4 | 10.0 ± 0.9 | 10.1 ± 1.0 |
| Removal (%) | 88.0 ± 9.9 | 100.0 ± 8.6 a | 93.5 ± 3.6 a | 65.9 ± 2.4 a | 92.2 ± 10.5 a | 89.2 ± 17.6 a | 91 ± 12.9 a | 88.1 ± 13.2 a | |
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Biomass production (g DW L−1), maximum growth rate (μmax, d−1) and exponential growth phase productivity (g L−1 d−1) of C. vulgaris 211-11b and the local isolate under different initial NH4-N levels.
| 500 mg L−1 | 250 mg L−1 | 150 mg L−1 | 25 mg L−1 | 500 mg L−1 | 250 mg L−1 | 150 mg L−1 | 25 mg L−1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Biomass Conc. (g L−1) | 0.63 ± 0.04 c | 0.69 ± 0.05 c | 0.86 ± 0.06 b,c | 1.02 ± 0.14 a,b,c | 1.07 ± 0.06 a,b,c | 1.34 ± 0.18 a,b | 1.38 ± 0.2 a | 1.43 ± 0.10 a |
| μmax (day−1) | 0.23 ± 0.00 a,b | 0.24 ± 0.02 a,b | 0.19 ± 0.08 a,b | 0.15 ± 0.01 a,b | 0.26 ± 0.03 a | 0.25 ± 0.00 a,b | 0.24 ± 0.00 a,b | 0.13 ± 0.02 b |
| Productivity (g L−1 d−1) | 0.08 ± 0.00 a,b | 0.10 ± 0.01 a,b | 0.07 ± 0.02 b | 0.07 ± 0.00 b | 0.12 ± 0.00 a,b | 0.13 ± 0.03 a | 0.10 ± 0.00 a,b | 0.08 ± 0.00 a,b |
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Figure 1Biomass growth as a function of time for different initial concentrations of NH4-N. ((A) Biomass of C. vulgaris 211-11b, (B) biomass of local isolate Chlorella sp.).
Concentration of pigments, chlorophylls a, b (Ca+b) and total carotenoids (Crt), in C. vulgaris 211-11b and the local isolate cultures. Outset concentrations of chlorophylls a, b and total carotenoids were 1.5 and 0.3 mg L−1, respectively, for all initial NH4-N concentrations.
| 500 mg L−1 | 250 mg L−1 | 150 mg L−1 | 25 mg L−1 | 500 mg L−1 | 250 mg L−1 | 150 mg L−1 | 25 mg L−1 | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (mg L−1) | Ca+b | Crt | Ca+b | Crt | Ca+b | Crt | Ca+b | Crt | Ca+b | Crt | Ca+b | Crt | Ca+b | Crt | Ca+b | Crt |
| Day 12 | 21.5 ± 2.9 c,d | 3.7 ± 0.4 C | 30.4 ± 0.0 b,c | 5.1 ± 0.1 A,B,C | 19.3 ± 0.3 d | 5.1 ± 0.2 A,B,C | 19.5 ± 2.8 c,d | 3.7 ± 0.5 C | 45.2 ± 7.4 a | 7.4 ± 1.1 A | 33.5 ± 0.1 b | 4.8 ± 0.2 A,B,C | 39.4 ± 0.5 a,b | 7.3 ± 1.7 A,B | 21.2 ± 0.0 c,d | 4.3 ± 0.0 B,C |
| Day 24 | 26.5 ± 3.6 c,d,e | 3.7 ± 0.2 D,E | 38.5 ± 1.8 b,c | 5.2 ± 0.3 C,D | 33.2 ± 3.8 c,d | 7.6 ± 1.2 B | 16.6 ± 0.5 e | 2.8 ± 0.5 E | 65.1 ± 6.0 a | 11.1 ± 0.4 A | 52.7 ± 4.6 a,b | 6.4 ± 0.8 B,C | 57.8 ± 3.7 a | 12.7 ± 0.1 A | 19.1 ± 1.1 d,e | 4.3 ± 0.1 C,D,E |
Means that do not share a letter are significantly different.
Figure 2Biomass composition (%) of C. vulgaris 211-11b, on dry weight basis, as determined on the 12th and 24th days of growth.
Figure 3Biomass composition (%) of Chlorella sp. (local isolate), on dry weight basis, as determined on the 12th and 24th days of growth.
Figure 4Identification of fatty acids (FAs) in dry biomass of C. vulgaris 211-11b and Chlorella sp. (local isolate) on the 12th and 24th days of growth. Data are given as percentages (%) of total fatty acids detected ((A) FAs for C. vulgaris 211-11b on the 12th day, (B) FA composition for C. vulgaris 211-11b on 24th day, (C) FA composition for Chlorella sp. (local isolate) on 12th day, (D) FA composition for Chlorella sp. (local isolate) on 24th day).
Figure 5Pictures of the two Chlorella strains using the laboratory optical microscope Nikon ECLIPSE E200 (magnification: x100/1.25) ((A) picture of C. vulgaris 211-11b from a storage culture, (B) picture of the Algerian isolate Chlorella sp. from a storage culture).