| Literature DB >> 35877396 |
Pertti Patinen1, Tarja Tanner1, Mika Huttunen1,2, Annakaisa Muhonen2, Sari Räsänen2, Pernelle Moilanen1, Jari Päkkilä3, Vuokko Anttonen1, Antti Kämppi1,4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Finland, the development of oral health in young, 19- to 21-year-old males regarding restorative treatment need seems to have slowed down according to cross-sectional conscript studies between 1976 and 2011. At the individual level, the mean number of decayed teeth (DT > 0) has also steadily continued to decline. In Finland, military service is mandatory, and around 85% of males complete it. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the oral health status of young men at the beginning of the 2020s.Entities:
Keywords: caries burden; conscripts; erosive tooth wear
Year: 2022 PMID: 35877396 PMCID: PMC9316641 DOI: 10.3390/dj10070122
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dent J (Basel) ISSN: 2304-6767
Summary of previous cross sectional studies conducted on Finnish conscripts—1979–2011.
| Data | Sample n | Ages | Gender | 3rd Molars | Mean | SD | 99% C.I. for Mean | DT > 0 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1976 [ | 3344 | 17–29 | M | Yes | 4.34 | 5.03 | 4.25, 4.43 | 75.6% |
| 1993 [ | 2850 | 19–20 | M | Yes | 1.98 | 3.08 | 1.92, 2.04 | 56.0% |
| 2011 [ | 13564 | 19–21 | M | No | 1.40 | 2.50 | 1.38, 1.43 | 45.1% |
DMFT values with and without third molars.
| 3rd Molars Included | 3rd Molars Excluded | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year of Birth | DT | MT | FT | DMFT | DT | MT | FT | DMFT | |
| n | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | Mean (SD) | |
| 2000 | 39 | 2.69 (3.00) | 0.03 (0.16) | 2.67 (3.20) | 5.23 (4.77) | 2.54 (2.93) | 0.15 (0.67) | 2.69 (3.26) | 5.54 (4.78) |
| 2001 | 159 | 1.49 (3.00) | 0.09 (0.33) | 2.36 (2.76) | 3.80 (4.06) | 1.34 (2.76) | 0.30 (0.77) | 2.37 (2.76) | 4.14 (4.28) |
| 2002 | 310 | 0.75 (1.59) | 0.03 (0.19) | 1.57 (2.20) | 2.28 (3.05) | 0.67 (1.52) | 0.16 (0.64) | 1.57 (2.20) | 2.48 (3.21) |
| All | 508 | 1.13 (2.31) | 0.20 (0.67) | 1.91 (2.51) | 3.23 (3.83) | 1.03 (2.17) | 0.05 (0.24) | 1.91 (2.50) | 2.98 (3.66) |
| 95% CI | (0.93, 1.33) | (0.14, 0.26) | (1.69, 2.13) | (2.90, 3.57) | (0.84, 1.21) | (0.03, 0.07) | (1.69, 2.12) | (2.66, 3.30) | |
Distribution of DT (a) and DMFT (b) values with and without third molars.
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2000 | 39 | 35.9 (14) | 64.1 (25) | 35.9 (14) | 64.1 (25) |
| 2001 | 159 | 55.3 (88) | 44.7 (71) | 56.6 (90) | 43.4 (69) |
| 2002 | 310 | 71.3 (221) | 28.7 (89) | 73.2 (227) | 26.8 (83) |
| All | 508 | 63.6 (323) | 36.4 (185) | 65.2 (331) | 34.8 (177) |
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2000 | 39 | 17.9 (7) | 82.1 (32) | 20.5 (8) | 79.5 (31) |
| 2001 | 159 | 19.5 (31) | 80.5 (128) | 22.0 (35) | 78.0 (124) |
| 2002 | 310 | 39.0 (121) | 61.0 (189) | 41.0 (127) | 59.0 (183) |
| All | 508 | 31.3 (159) | 68.7 (349) | 33.5 (170) | 66.5 (338) |
Figure 1Polarization and concentration of caries burden among Finnish conscripts (Lorentz curve) 2021.
Distribution of BEWE score values with and without third molars.
| BEWE Score | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Year of Birth | 0 | 1–2 | 3–8 | 9–13 |
| % (n) | % (n) | % (n) | % (n) | |
| 2000 | 40.5 (15) | 27.0 (10) | 27.0 (10) | 5.4 (2) |
| 2001 | 42.4 (64) | 32.5 (49) | 25.2 (38) | 0.0 (0) |
| 2002 | 36.3 (111) | 42.2 (188) | 20.3 (62) | 1.3 (4) |
| All | 38.5 (190) | 38.1 (188) | 22.3 (110) | 1.2 (6) |
Figure 2Summary of previous cross-sectional studies [5,6,7,8] polarizations (Lorentz curve) of Finnish conscripts. The curves of Ankkuriniemi and Läärä were manually adjusted from their dissertations.