Literature DB >> 35876926

Validation of a Nomogram to Predict Recurrence in Patients with Mucinous Neoplasms of the Appendix with Peritoneal Dissemination After Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC.

L Martín Román1,2, P Lozano1,2, D Baratti3, S Kusamura4, M Deraco4, W Vásquez1,2, L González Bayón1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Survival of patients affected by mucinous appendiceal neoplasms with peritoneal dissemination (PD) is mainly related to histopathological features. However, prognostic stratification is still a concern, as the clinical course of the disease is often unpredictable. The aim of this study is to construct and externally validate a nomogram predicting disease-free survival (DFS) in mucinous appendiceal neoplasms with PD treated by cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients treated in two referral centers were included: Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain (derivation cohort) and Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy (validation cohort). Cox regression analysis identified factors associated with shorter DFS in the derivation cohort. The nomogram performance was externally evaluated in the validation cohort using concordance index and calibration plots. Histology was classified according to the Peritoneal Surface Oncology Group International (PSOGI).
RESULTS: The derivation cohort included 95 patients, and the validation cohort 348. Five-year DFS rates were 51.5 and 62%, respectively. Cox regression analysis (derivation cohort) identified PSOGI histology of the peritoneal components, number of preoperative elevated tumor marker, and peritoneal disease extent, as assessed by peritoneal carcinomatosis index, to be predictors of DFS. The model's predictive capacity was higher than that of PSOGI classification alone, with respective concordance indexes of 0.702 ± 0.023 and 0.610 ± 0.018 (validation cohort). The nomogram approximated the perfect model in the calibration plots at 3- and 5-year DFS.
CONCLUSIONS: An easy-to-use model that provides better prognostic stratification than histopathological features has been constructed. This nomogram may help clinicians in individualized survival predictions and informed clinical decision-making.
© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35876926     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-022-12060-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   4.339


  36 in total

1.  Early recurrence of pseudomyxoma peritonei following treatment failure of cytoreductive surgery and perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is indicative of a poor survival outcome.

Authors:  Terence C Chua; Winston Liauw; David L Morris
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Pseudomyxoma peritonei of appendiceal origin: a clinicopathologic analysis of 101 patients uniformly treated at a single institution, with literature review.

Authors:  Robert F Bradley; John H Stewart; Gregory B Russell; Edward A Levine; Kim R Geisinger
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 6.394

3.  Progression of pseudomyxoma peritonei after combined modality treatment: management and outcome.

Authors:  Robert M Smeenk; Vic J Verwaal; Ninja Antonini; Frans A N Zoetmulder
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-11-11       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  New standard of care for appendiceal epithelial neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei syndrome?

Authors:  Paul H Sugarbaker
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 41.316

5.  Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in 1000 patients with perforated appendiceal epithelial tumours.

Authors:  N Ansari; K Chandrakumaran; S Dayal; F Mohamed; T D Cecil; B J Moran
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Appendiceal mucinous neoplasms: a clinicopathologic analysis of 107 cases.

Authors:  Joseph Misdraji; Rhonda K Yantiss; Fiona M Graeme-Cook; Ulysses J Balis; Robert H Young
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Disseminated peritoneal adenomucinosis and peritoneal mucinous carcinomatosis. A clinicopathologic analysis of 109 cases with emphasis on distinguishing pathologic features, site of origin, prognosis, and relationship to "pseudomyxoma peritonei".

Authors:  B M Ronnett; C M Zahn; R J Kurman; M E Kass; P H Sugarbaker; B M Shmookler
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 6.394

Review 8.  Appendiceal tumours and pseudomyxoma peritonei: Literature review with PSOGI/EURACAN clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  K Govaerts; R J Lurvink; I H J T De Hingh; K Van der Speeten; L Villeneuve; S Kusamura; V Kepenekian; M Deraco; O Glehen; B J Moran
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Appendiceal neoplasms and pseudomyxoma peritonei: a population based study.

Authors:  R M Smeenk; M L F van Velthuysen; V J Verwaal; F A N Zoetmulder
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 4.424

10.  Clinically aggressive pseudomyxoma peritonei: a variant of a histologically indolent process.

Authors:  Faheez Mohamed; Sue Gething; Moutaz Haiba; Erwin A Brun; Paul H Sugarbaker
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.