| Literature DB >> 35876569 |
Katherine F Steward1, Devon Payne2, Will Kincannon1, Christina Johnson1, Malachi Lensing1, Hunter Fausset1, Brigitta Németh1, Eric M Shepard1, William E Broderick1, Joan B Broderick1, Jen Dubois1, Brian Bothner1.
Abstract
Iron sulfur (Fe-S) proteins are essential and ubiquitous across all domains of life, yet the mechanisms underpinning assimilation of iron (Fe) and sulfur (S) and biogenesis of Fe-S clusters are poorly understood. This is particularly true for anaerobic methanogenic archaea, which are known to employ more Fe-S proteins than other prokaryotes. Here, we utilized a deep proteomics analysis of Methanococcus voltae A3 cultured in the presence of either synthetic pyrite (FeS2) or aqueous forms of ferrous iron and sulfide to elucidate physiological responses to growth on mineral or nonmineral sources of Fe and S. The liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS) shotgun proteomics analysis included 77% of the predicted proteome. Through a comparative analysis of intra- and extracellular proteomes, candidate proteins associated with FeS2 reductive dissolution, Fe and S acquisition, and the subsequent transport, trafficking, and storage of Fe and S were identified. The proteomic response shows a large and balanced change, suggesting that M. voltae makes physiological adjustments involving a range of biochemical processes based on the available nutrient source. Among the proteins differentially regulated were members of core methanogenesis, oxidoreductases, membrane proteins putatively involved in transport, Fe-S binding ferredoxin and radical S-adenosylmethionine proteins, ribosomal proteins, and intracellular proteins involved in Fe-S cluster assembly and storage. This work improves our understanding of ancient biogeochemical processes and can support efforts in biomining of minerals. IMPORTANCE Clusters of iron and sulfur are key components of the active sites of enzymes that facilitate microbial conversion of light or electrical energy into chemical bonds. The proteins responsible for transporting iron and sulfur into cells and assembling these elements into metal clusters are not well understood. Using a microorganism that has an unusually high demand for iron and sulfur, we conducted a global investigation of cellular proteins and how they change based on the mineral forms of iron and sulfur. Understanding this process will answer questions about life on early earth and has application in biomining and sustainable sources of energy.Entities:
Keywords: iron-sulfur cluster; mackinawite; methanogen; proteomics; pyrite
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35876569 PMCID: PMC9431491 DOI: 10.1128/spectrum.01893-22
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiol Spectr ISSN: 2165-0497
FIG 1Pathway distribution of identified intracellular proteins based on gene annotations in DAVID (23, 24).
FIG 2Differential analysis of sample groups. (a) Principal-component analysis (PCA) of FeS2 and Fe(II)/HS−. (b) Heat map based on the top 500 proteins that differentiate cells grown on FeS2 from those grown on Fe(II)/HS− as the mineral source. Biological replicates (columns) and proteins (rows) are arranged by hierarchical clustering using Euclidean distance and Ward clustering algorithms. The key indicates fold change in protein abundance.
GO annotation
| Function and protein | No. more abundant in: | No. with no change | |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeS2 | Fe(II)/HS− | ||
| Cellular maintenance | |||
| Metal uptake, trafficking, storage | 10 | 5 | |
| Transcriptional regulation and/or signaling | 12 | 9 | 7 |
| Uncharacterized Fe-S binding proteins | 6 | 3 | |
| ABC transporters | 4 | 5 | 6 |
| Ferredoxins | 14 | 7 | 18 |
| Sulfur metabolism | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Radical SAM proteins | 5 | 9 | 13 |
| Oxidoreductases | 27 | 12 | |
| Nitrogenase (not present in |
|
| |
| Hydrogenase (includes F420 dependent) | 8 | 5 | 2 |
| Metabolic pathways | 1 | 1 | 10 |
| Glycolysis/gluconeogenesis | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| TCA cycle proteins | 1 | 2 | 11 |
| Methanogenesis/methanogenesis marker | 6 | 5 | 35 |
| Uncharacterized proteins | 37 | 35 | 126 |
| Biosynthetic pathways | 13 | 13 | |
| Cofactor biosynthesis | 12 | 20 | 3 |
| Amino acid/protein metabolism | 13 | 28 | 1 |
| Carbohydrate metabolism | 8 | 5 | |
| Transferases, lyases, ligases | 3 | 10 | 9 |
| Hydrolases: esterases, amidases | 8 | 3 | 3 |
| Nucleotide binding, kinase, phosphatases | 4 | 10 | 3 |
| Nucleic acid metabolism | 12 | 51 | 19 |
| Conjugation, cell division | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Motility | 0 | 6 | 1 |
| Chemotaxis | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Ribosomal protein | 1 | 39 | 40 |
| S-layer, cell wall protein | 3 | 3 | 5 |
| Transport | 3 | 5 | |
| Membrane proteins | 5 | 2 | 16 |
| Membrane transport | 3 | 9 | 3 |
| CRISPR | 4 | 1 | 12 |
| Stress-related proteins | 19 | 16 | 31 |
| Respiration | 0 | 3 | 6 |
Pathways of interest.
FIG 3Overview of pathway specific changes with respect to culture conditions. Colored segments show the percentage of intracellular proteins in a given pathway that were more abundant in the presence of FeS2 (green), more abundant in the presence of Fe(II)HS− (blue), and unchanged (yellow). Numerals on the bars show the actual number of proteins. Annotations were made using UniProt, GO, STRING, and KEGG.
KEGG annotation
| Category and protein | Accession no. | Intracellular abundance (log) in: | Fold change | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FeS2 | Fe(II)/HS− | ||||
| Sulfur metabolism | |||||
| SufBD |
| 1.193220 | 1.089336 | ||
| Phosphoadenosine phosphosulfate reductase |
| 0.067645 | 0.209334 | −3.09454 | 0.0017082 |
| SufC |
| 0.567117 | 0.401460 | ||
| TCA cycle | |||||
| Thiamine pyrophosphate protein domain protein TPP-binding |
| 1.46105 | 1.59608 | ||
| Pyruvate flavodoxin/ferredoxin oxidoreductase domain |
| 3.43884 | 5.41021 | ||
| Acetyl-CoA carboxylase, biotin carboxylase |
| 0.47494 | 1.20170 | −2.53024 | 5.63E−05 |
| Pyruvate flavodoxin/ferredoxin oxidoreductase domain |
| 0.77251 | 0.83106 | ||
| Oxaloacetate decarboxylase alpha subunit |
| 1.27881 | 4.07144 | −3.18380 | 1.58E−06 |
| Thiamine pyrophosphate protein domain protein TPP-binding |
| 0.25659 | 0.27201 | ||
| Malate dehydrogenase [NADP(+)] |
| 0.19713 | 0.38894 | ||
| Pyruvate ferredoxin/flavodoxin oxidoreductase, delta subunit |
| 0.47768 | 0.57191 | ||
| Pyruvate/ketoisovalerate oxidoreductase, gamma subunit |
| 2.18007 | 2.06684 | ||
| FAD-dependent pyridine nucleotide-disulfide oxidoreductase |
| 0.05533 | 0.00596 | 9.2755 | 0.000356 |
| Pyruvate/ketoisovalerate oxidoreductase |
| 0.80107 | 0.76887 | ||
| Hydro-lyase, Fe-S type, tartrate/fumarate subfamily, beta subunit |
| 0.03225 | 0.03141 | ||
| Hydro-lyase, Fe-S type, tartrate/fumarate subfamily, alpha subunit |
| 0.06394 | 0.09762 | ||
| Sulfur relay system | |||||
| DsrE family protein |
| 0.146182 | 0.135039 | ||
| SirA family protein |
| 0.025526 | 0.050366 | ||
| Molybdopterin biosynthesis MoaE protein |
| 0.127704 | 0.064877 | ||
| UBA/THIF-type NAD/FAD binding protein |
| 0.048156 | 0.028839 | ||
| Thiamine S protein |
| 0.009235 | 0.012298 | ||
| Molybdopterin converting factor, subunit 1 |
| 0.102335 | 0.072400 | ||
| ABC transporter-related proteins | |||||
| Extracellular solute-binding protein family 1 |
| 2.89244 | 2.05020 | ||
| 5-Formaminoimidazole-4-carboxamide-1-(beta)- |
| 11.55548 | 5.51428 | ||
| ABC transporter-related protein |
| 0.06359 | 0.01663 | 3.8233 | 0.0023623 |
| ABC transporter-related protein |
| 0.23008 | 0.55915 | −2.43019 | 0.0003957 |
| ABC transporter-related protein |
| 21.68802 | 15.94546 | ||
| Formate/nitrite transporter |
| 1.57738 | 1.21316 | ||
| Substrate-binding region of ABC-type glycine betaine transport system |
| 0.52625 | 0.38597 | ||
| ABC transporter-related protein |
| 0.10431 | 0.27874 | −2.67215 | 0.0057287 |
| Glycine betaine/ |
| 0.11761 | 0.16812 | ||
| ABC transporter-related protein |
| 0.00454 | 0.02613 | −5.76203 | 0.0038215 |
| Molybdenum ABC transporter, periplasmic molybdate-binding protein |
| 0.00439 | 0.04525 | −10.30237 | 0.013507 |
| Phosphate-binding protein |
| 0.03425 | 0.03782 | ||
| Methanogenesis proteins | |||||
| MfrA |
| 6.79839 | 5.29676 | ||
| MfrB |
| 4.56420 | 5.12853 | ||
| MfrC |
| 3.71482 | 3.51635 | ||
| MfrE |
| 0.11912 | 0.42939 | −3.6046 | 0.021716 |
| MfrA2 |
| 0.09261 | 0.07055 | ||
| MfrC2 |
| 0.11450 | 0.05754 | ||
| MfrB2 |
| 0.06535 | 0.03133 | 2.0857 | 0.016285 |
| Ftr |
| 6.53255 | 7.18286 | ||
| Mch |
| 4.17309 | 3.99639 | ||
| Mtd |
| 21.68802 | 15.94546 | ||
| Mer |
| 15.61439 | 7.61597 | 2.0502 | 0.0056952 |
| MtrA |
| 0.08459 | 0.25803 | ||
| MtrD |
| 0.00019 | 0.01764 | ||
| MtrG |
| 1.34331 | 0.24835 | ||
| MtrB |
| 1.08177 | 1.52612 | ||
| MtrC |
| 0.09097 | 0.17195 | ||
| MtrH |
| 0.74917 | 0.25003 | ||
| McrG |
| 6.19291 | 7.00046 | ||
| McrA |
| 11.52656 | 8.86821 | ||
| McrB |
| 13.73103 | 7.97736 | ||
| FrhG |
| 0.08514 | 0.03158 | ||
| FrhA |
| 20.24111 | 10.02758 | 2.0185 | 0.0009404 |
| FrhB |
| 6.66821 | 3.28590 | 2.0293 | 0.0013333 |
| HdrA |
| 5.33667 | 7.00000 | ||
| HdrB |
| 1.46509 | 2.41792 | ||
| HdrC |
| 0.26271 | 0.83447 | −3.1763 | 0.0005709 |
| HdrB2 |
| 1.26740 | 0.19729 | 6.4242 | 5.04E−05 |
| HdrC2 |
| 0.59715 | 0.08463 | 7.0557 | 9.79E−06 |
| EhaM |
| 0.24403 | 0.08458 | 2.8853 | 0.0001441 |
| EhaF |
| 0.13484 | 0.07181 | ||
| EhaH |
| 0.02553 | 0.01266 | 2.0161 | 0.027129 |
A minus sign indicates that the protein was more abundant in Fe(II)/HS−.
FIG 4Volcano plot of proteins cultured with FeS2 or Fe(II)/HS−. Each spot represents a protein, with the fold change (horizontal) and P value (vertical) indicated by position in the graph. Circled spots highlight proteins annotated to contain specific sequence and or chemical characteristics. (A) Proteins with high cysteine content. (B) Basic proteins, enriched in lysine, arginine, and histidine. (C) ATP binding domains based on GO categories (GO: 0005524). (D) Structural components of the ribosome. Tabular data for the plots can be found in Table S3a to e.
FIG 5Extracellular protein pools. (A) Comparison of proteins present in the media under different growth conditions. Proteins unique to a condition were at least 20-fold more abundant in that condition. (B) Functional categorization of extracellular proteins upregulated during growth with FeS2, Fe(II)/HS−, and both. Upregulated proteins were functionally categorized according to their UniProt annotations and GO classifications. While the functional distributions of proteins from the sulfide and pyrite conditions were similar, proteins specifically upregulated specifically by one or the other growth condition were predominantly in the “pathway independent Fe/S binding proteins,” “energy metabolism,” and “element metabolism” groups (“pathway independent” indicates that the proteins could not be clearly identified with a particular metabolic pathway or process). Further division of each group into subgroups is given in Table S12.
FIG 6Overview of proteins and pathways associated with M. voltae grown on pyrite (left) or Fe(II)HS−(right). Potential mechanisms for Fe-S cluster import and proteins involved, such as DUF2193, the iron uptake protein FeoB, and potential Fe-S extracellular metal binding and assimilation targets. Iron and sulfur usage through desulfurases, ferredoxins, and the SufC and SufB proteins is also represented. On the right, increased energy metabolism, ATP-binding proteins, and the ABC molybdenum transporter Mvol_0749 are represented. Sulfide assimilation into cysteine, homocysteine, and tetrapyrrole formation is also depicted.