Literature DB >> 35875621

The concept of recovery kinetics: an observational study of continuous post-operative monitoring in spine surgery.

Monish Maharaj1,2,3,4,5, Pragadesh Natarajan1,2,3, R Dineth Fonseka1,2,3, Sukrit Khanna1, Wen Jie Choy1,2,3, Kaitlin Rooke5, Kevin Phan2, Ralph Jasper Mobbs1,2,3,4,5.   

Abstract

Background: The spine surgeon's understanding of an individual patient's burden of disease and functional disability in daily life is shaped by patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Although PROMs are useful in understanding the patient's perception of their disease, the use of PROMs constitutes a "snapshot" approach of single timepoint data capture, omitting day-to-day fluctuations in functional status. We introduce the concept of kinetics when considering continuous and objective postoperative patient monitoring with wearable sensors.
Methods: A prospective single-centre series was performed using patients either undergoing lumbar decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) (n=12), or posterior lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis (n=12). The Oswestry Disability Index (PROM) was conducted preoperatively and 12-weeks postoperatively. During this timeframe, continuous measurements of step count and distance travelled were made using a wrist-based wearable accelerometer.
Results: Over the 12-week study period, mean daily step count for all participants improved from 4,700 to 7,700 steps per day (P=0.013), following an initial dip in total steps taken. The mean daily distance travelled improved from 3,300 to 5,300 meters per day (P=0.003). Decompression group recovered at a faster rate than the fusion group. Conclusions: Although overall improvement was similar between the decompression and fusion groups, the recovery kinetics varied. The recovery kinetics approach of continuous postoperative monitoring provides additional insight to postoperative patient progress. 2022 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lumbar spine; objective assessment; patient monitoring; post-operative recovery; spine surgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 35875621      PMCID: PMC9263729          DOI: 10.21037/jss-22-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  30 in total

Review 1.  The Oswestry Disability Index.

Authors:  J C Fairbank; P B Pynsent
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 2.  Evaluating the correlation and responsiveness of patient-reported pain with function and quality-of-life outcomes after spine surgery.

Authors:  John DeVine; Daniel C Norvell; Erika Ecker; Daryl R Fourney; Alex Vaccaro; Jeff Wang; Gunnar Andersson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Objective monitoring of activity and Gait Velocity using wearable accelerometer following lumbar microdiscectomy to detect recurrent disc herniation.

Authors:  Ralph J Mobbs; Christopher J Katsinas; Wen Jie Choy; Kaitlin Rooke; Monish Maharaj
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-12

4.  Gait and functional status analysis before and after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Dawid Bączkowicz; Grzegorz Skiba; Marek Czerner; Edyta Majorczyk
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2018-06-23       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Measurement Properties of the Oswestry Disability Index in Recipients of Lumbar Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Chad E Cook; Alessandra N Garcia; Alexis Wright; Christopher Shaffrey; Oren Gottfried
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Biomechanical changes and recovery of gait function after total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  J S Bahl; M J Nelson; M Taylor; L B Solomon; J B Arnold; D Thewlis
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 6.576

Review 7.  Patient-reported outcome measures in spine surgery.

Authors:  John D McCormick; Brian C Werner; Adam L Shimer
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-08       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Proposed objective scoring algorithm for walking performance, based on relevant gait metrics: the Simplified Mobility Score (SMoS™)-observational study.

Authors:  Callum Betteridge; Ralph Jasper Mobbs; Daniel Ho
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Objective activity tracking in spine surgery: a prospective feasibility study with a low-cost consumer grade wearable accelerometer.

Authors:  Martin N Stienen; Paymon G Rezaii; Allen L Ho; Anand Veeravagu; Corinna C Zygourakis; Christy Tomkins-Lane; Jon Park; John K Ratliff; Atman M Desai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.