Literature DB >> 35875619

Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: SpineJack vs. posterior arthrodesis-comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Enrico Giordan1, Jacopo Del Verme1, Giulia Pastorello1, Paolo Gallinaro1, Roberto Zanata1, Giuseppe Canova1, Francesco Di Paola2, Elisabetta Marton3, Altin Stafa2.   

Abstract

Background: Thoracolumbar fractures sometimes require anterior support and post-traumatic deformity correction. SpineJack proved favorable results in cadaveric and clinical studies, with satisfactory pain relief, vertebral height restoration, and low rates of above adjacent fractures, in neurologically intact fractures. We compared patients' clinical and radiological outcomes of thoracolumbar fractures treated either with posterior arthrodesis or SpineJack.
Methods: We prospectively collected A2 split and A3, and A4 burst fractures between 2017 and 2021. Patients were stratified in posterior arthrodesis (PA group) and SpineJack (SJ group) and included if age ≥18 years, T11-L3 level, emergent or elective surgery, single or multiple, and neurologically intact. Age, sex, type and level, pain, operative and discharge time, vertebral body heights (VBH), posterior wall retropulsion (PWR), vertebral kyphosis (VK) and local kyphosis (LK) angles, vertebral body (VB) volume, and complications were collected. We then compared clinical-radiographic outcomes between the two groups.
Results: We found no significant differences in median postoperative pain while operative time and discharge time were shorter for SJ patients than PA ones (P<0.001). Mean anterior VBH increase was 20.7%, mid-VBH was 25.5%, and posterior VBH was 8.8%, while increase in VB volume was 26.2%. SJ patients had non-inferior VK e LK angles correction to PA ones. Mean PWR value between pre and post SJ implantation was 0.15±0.65 mm, and no adjacent above-level fractures occurred. Conclusions: We showed satisfactory outcomes in a selected range of neurologically intact thoracolumbar split or burst fractures. SJ leads to shorter operative and discharge time and good VB angles and diameters restoration. 2022 Journal of Spine Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  SpineJack; burst fracture; intrasomatic device; spine; thoracolumbar; trauma

Year:  2022        PMID: 35875619      PMCID: PMC9263732          DOI: 10.21037/jss-21-118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spine Surg        ISSN: 2414-4630


  24 in total

1.  Cement leakage as a possible complication of balloon kyphoplasty--is there a difference between osteoporotic compression fractures (AO type A1) and incomplete burst fractures (AO type A3.1)?

Authors:  Jan Walter; Ersin Haciyakupoglu; Albrecht Waschke; Rolf Kalff; Christian Ewald
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.216

2.  3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the Quantitative Imaging Network.

Authors:  Andriy Fedorov; Reinhard Beichel; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Julien Finet; Jean-Christophe Fillion-Robin; Sonia Pujol; Christian Bauer; Dominique Jennings; Fiona Fennessy; Milan Sonka; John Buatti; Stephen Aylward; James V Miller; Steve Pieper; Ron Kikinis
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  Armed Kyphoplasty: An Indirect Central Canal Decompression Technique in Burst Fractures.

Authors:  A Venier; L Roccatagliata; M Isalberti; P Scarone; D E Kuhlen; M Reinert; G Bonaldi; J A Hirsch; A Cianfoni
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  A prospective, international, randomized, noninferiority study comparing an implantable titanium vertebral augmentation device versus balloon kyphoplasty in the reduction of vertebral compression fractures (SAKOS study).

Authors:  David Noriega; Stefano Marcia; Nicolas Theumann; Benjamin Blondel; Alexandre Simon; Frank Hassel; Gianluca Maestretti; Antoine Petit; Patrick A Weidle; Andres Gonzalez Mandly; Jean-Marc Kaya; Adamou Touta; Stéphane Fuentes; Robert Pflugmacher
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Clinical and radiological outcomes in thoracolumbar fractures using the SpineJack device. A prospective study of seventy-four patients with a two point three year mean of follow-up.

Authors:  Gael Kerschbaumer; Benoit Gaulin; Sébastien Ruatti; Jérôme Tonetti; Mehdi Boudissa
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Balloon vertebroplasty in combination with pedicle screw instrumentation: a novel technique to treat thoracic and lumbar burst fractures.

Authors:  Jorrit-Jan Verlaan; Wouter J A Dhert; Abraham J Verbout; F Cumhur Oner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Minimal invasive short posterior instrumentation plus balloon kyphoplasty with calcium phosphate for burst and severe compression lumbar fractures.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Alexander Hadjipavlou; Thomas Repantis
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries.

Authors:  F Magerl; M Aebi; S D Gertzbein; J Harms; S Nazarian
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  A Colombian experience involving SpineJack®, a consecutive series of patients experiencing spinal fractures, percutaneous approach and anatomical restoration 2016-2017.

Authors:  Juan Esteban Muñoz Montoya; Christian Torres; Esteban Ramírez Ferrer; Erik Edgardo Muñoz Rodríguez
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-09

Review 10.  Open Versus Minimally Invasive Fixation Techniques for Thoracolumbar Trauma: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Steven J McAnany; Samuel C Overley; Jun S Kim; Evan O Baird; Sheeraz A Qureshi; Paul A Anderson
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2015-06-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.