Literature DB >> 35875388

Reproductive Services and Conscience-Based Refusals in Obstetrics and Gynecology Training.

Kristin Kalinowski1, Cara Buskmiller2, Donald G Ward3.   

Abstract

Purpose: Professional bodies such as the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology recognize the impact of conscience-based decisions. The first time such decisions affect patients and providers is in residency. Our study sought to determine the attitudes of program directors towards various conscience-based refusals in potential applicants to obstetrics and gynecology programs. Method: An eight-question survey was sent to 279 directors of U.S. obstetrics and gynecology residencies in 2019. The survey proposed hypothetical conscientious refusals of common aspects of obstetric and gynecology practice. The survey asked respondents to categorize their reaction to these choices and choose from a list of factors which could modify their reaction. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed.
Results: 97 program directors (35%) responded. A majority of PDs reported that the inability to prescribe or counsel on birth control, to provide methotrexate, to counsel on abortion, or to clearly enumerate refusals was impossible to work around, likely to lower an applicant's rank, not compatible with training, or not good for patients; collectively, these responses were grouped as "negative reactions" (73-99%). Female program directors had more negative reactions to applicants who refused to prescribe birth control (aOR 15.8, 95% CI 1.7-99.5) and counsel on abortion (aOR 3.6, 95% CI 1.2-10.8). Directors from different locations and program types did not have significantly different responses. A few program directors identified that academic strength could mitigate otherwise negatively-viewed choices. Illustrative comments of directors' attitudes are provided. Conclusions: Program directors agree that conscientious refusal to participate in certain activities is problematic for obstetrics and gynecology residency. There are very few subjective or regional differences on this stance, and few aspects of an application modify directors' reactions. © Catholic Medical Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autonomy; conscience; medical education; qualitative research; reproductive freedom; survey

Year:  2021        PMID: 35875388      PMCID: PMC9297479          DOI: 10.1177/00243639211040589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  9 in total

1.  Declaration on procured abortion.

Authors: 
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  1975-05

2.  Committee Opinion no. 512: health care for transgender individuals.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 7.661

3.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 525: Health care for lesbians and bisexual women.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 7.661

4.  ACOG Committee Opinion No. 385 November 2007: the limits of conscientious refusal in reproductive medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Proceedings of the American Psychological Association for the legislative year 2012: minutes of the annual meeting of the Council of Representatives, February 24-26, 2012, Washington, DC, and August 2 and 5, 2012, Orlando, Florida, and minutes of the February, June, August, October, and December 2012 meetings of the Board of Directors.

Authors:  Barry S Anton
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug

6.  Contraception: traditional and religious attitudes.

Authors:  J G Schenker; V Rabenou
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Educating Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents on Transgender Patients: A Survey of Program Directors.

Authors:  Kavita Vinekar; Shannon K Rush; Seine Chiang; Melissa A Schiff
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  Development and Implementation of a Residency Area-of-Distinction in Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Mental Health.

Authors:  Weston S Fisher; Matthew E Hirschtritt; Ellen Haller
Journal:  Acad Psychiatry       Date:  2017-11-06

9.  Yes we can! Successful examples of disallowing 'conscientious objection' in reproductive health care.

Authors:  Christian Fiala; Kristina Gemzell Danielsson; Oskari Heikinheimo; Jens A Guðmundsson; Joyce Arthur
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 1.848

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.