Literature DB >> 35875386

Double-Effect Donation Disputed.

Thomas A Cavanaugh1.   

Abstract

In "Double Effect Donation," Camosy and Vukov argue that "there are circumstances in which it is morally permissible for a healthy individual to donate their organs even though their death is a foreseeable outcome". They propose that a living donor could ethically donate an entire, singular, vital organ while knowing that this act would result in death. In reply, I argue that it is not ethical for a living person to donate an entire, singular, vital organ. Moreover, mutatis mutandis, it is not ethical for surgeons and others to perform such a deadly operation. For to do so is "intentionally to cause the death of the donor in disposing of his organs". Such an act violates the dead donor rule which holds that an entire, singular, vital organ may be taken only from a corpse. Contrary to Camosy and Vukov's claims, double-effect reasoning does not endorse such organ donation. © Catholic Medical Association 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action theory; Euthanasia; Life issues; Organ donation/transplantation; Principle of double effect

Year:  2021        PMID: 35875386      PMCID: PMC9297483          DOI: 10.1177/00243639211038128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Linacre Q        ISSN: 0024-3639


  3 in total

1.  The dead donor rule.

Authors:  J A Robertson
Journal:  Hastings Cent Rep       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.683

2.  Girl awaits father's 2d kidney, and decision by medical ethicists.

Authors:  Evelyn Nieves
Journal:  N Y Times Web       Date:  1998-12-05

3.  Double Effect Donation.

Authors:  Charles C Camosy; Joseph Vukov
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2021-02-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.