| Literature DB >> 35875324 |
Andressa Barros Ibiapina1, Francisca Miriane de Araújo Batista1, Bruno Guedes Alcoforado Aguiar1, Vagner José Mendonça1, Dorcas Lamounier Costa1, Carlos Henrique Nery Costa1, Carmen Verônica Mendes Abdala2.
Abstract
Objective: To develop an evidence map on visceral leishmaniasis prevention, control, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.Entities:
Keywords: Leishmaniasis, visceral; evidence-based medicine; neglected diseases
Year: 2022 PMID: 35875324 PMCID: PMC9299391 DOI: 10.26633/RPSP.2022.89
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Panam Salud Publica ISSN: 1020-4989
Characterization of the included systematic reviews
|
Systematic review (reference) |
Level of confidence |
|---|---|
|
|
Moderate |
|
|
Low |
|
|
Critically low |
Strengths and weaknesses of the included systematic reviews, according to the criteria of the AMSTAR2 tool
|
Criteria |
Answers (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Yes |
Partial yes |
No |
No meta-analysis | |
|
Presence of components of PICO |
84.8 |
0 |
15.2 |
NA |
|
Written protocol |
3.0 |
57.6 |
39.4 |
NA |
|
Justification of the inclusion of the study designs |
15.2 |
0 |
84.8 |
NA |
|
Comprehensive literature search strategy |
6.1 |
45.5 |
48.8 |
NA |
|
Study selection in duplicate |
75.8 |
0 |
24.2 |
NA |
|
Data extraction in duplicate |
57.6 |
0 |
42.4 |
NA |
|
List of excluded studies |
15.2 |
6.1 |
78.8 |
NA |
|
Adequate description of the included studies |
27.3 |
21.2 |
51.5 |
NA |
|
Satisfactory technique for assessing the risk of bias |
30.3 |
6.1 |
63.6 |
NA |
|
Report on the sources of funding for the studies included |
3.0 |
0 |
97.0 |
NA |
|
Use of appropriate methods for statistical combination of results |
27.3 |
0 |
33.3 |
39.4 |
|
Assess the impact of risk of bias |
18.2 |
0 |
42.4 |
39.4 |
|
Account for risk of bias when interpreting/discussing |
36.4 |
0 |
63.6 |
NA |
|
Explanation for any heterogeneity |
45.5 |
0 |
54.5 |
NA |
|
Investigation of publication bias and discussion |
24.2 |
0 |
36.4 |
39.4 |
|
Report sources of conflict of interest |
90.9 |
0 |
9.1 |
NA |
“Answers (%)” represents the percentage of SRs with a specific answer.
Asterisk indicates critical items.
PICO, Population, Intervention, Control, and Outcome; NA, not applicable.
FIGURE 1.Effects of the prevention, control, and combined interventions on the respective visceral leishmaniasis outcomes
FIGURE 2.Effects of the diagnostic interventions on applicability and performance outcomes in detecting visceral leishmaniasis
FIGURE 3.Effects of the treatment interventions on the respective visceral leishmaniasis outcomes