| Literature DB >> 35875116 |
Weiwei Li1, Lin Zhang2, Yuanming Jing3, Yanfei Yang1, Yulong Wang4.
Abstract
Background: It remains unknown whether gastric histopathology is associated with the occurrence of colonic neoplasms. We aimed to clarify the association between gastric histopathology and different types of colorectal polyps (CP) and colorectal cancer (CRC), and whether various gastric histopathologies are risk factors for different types of CP and CRC.Entities:
Keywords: colorectal adenomatous polyps; colorectal cancer; gastric histopathology; logistic regression analysis; retrospective cross-sectional study
Year: 2022 PMID: 35875116 PMCID: PMC9299065 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.889417
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 5.738
Figure 1Flowchart of case selection.
The Pearson χ2 test and t test were used to compare the demographic characteristics and the occurrence of various gastric histopathology of cases in NAP, AP, CRC, and normal group.
| NAP | AP | CRC | Normal |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grand total | 689 (100) | 1,516 (100) | 74 (100) | 3,707 (100) | |
|
| |||||
| Female | 327 (47.46) | 670 (44.20) | 34 (45.95) | 2,196 (59.24) |
|
| Male | 362 (52.54) | 846 (55.80) | 40 (54.05) | 1,511 (40.76) | |
| Mean age (SD) | 53.3 (9.50) | 55.9 (9.23) | 62.3 (10.40) | 49.9 (10.90) |
|
|
| |||||
| NAG | 343 (49.78) | 719 (47.42) | 36 (48.65) | 2,226 (60.05) |
|
| AG or IM | 253 (36.72) | 609 (40.17) | 28 (37.84) | 1,098 (29.62) |
|
|
| 186 (27.00) | 454 (29.95) | 24 (32.43) | 989 (26.78) | 0.081 |
| FGP | 83 (12.05) | 197 (13.00) | 8 (10.81) | 364 (9.82) |
|
| GHP or GIP | 30 (4.35) | 67 (4.42) | 2 (2.70) | 106 (2.86) |
|
| GAP | 1 (0.15) | 7 (0.46) | 2 (2.70) | 4 (0.11) |
|
| LGIN | 22 (3.19) | 49 (3.23) | 3 (4.05) | 55 (1.48) |
|
| HGIN | 3 (0.44) | 3 (0.20) | 1 (1.35) | 8 (0.22) | 0.151 |
| SC-patho | 1 (0.15) | 3 (0.20) | 3 (4.05) | 8 (0.22) |
|
NAP, non-adenomatous polyps; AP, colorectal adenomatous polyps; CRC, colorectal cancer; NAG, non-atrophic gastritis; AG or IM, atrophy/intestinal metaplasia; FGP, gastric fundus gland polyp; GHP or GIP, hyperplastic/inflammatory gastric polyps; GAP, adenomatous gastric polyps; LGIN, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia; HGIN, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia; SC-patho, stomach cancer of pathology. P < 0.05 showed in bold.
Figure 2The results of multivariate logistic regression for the NAP group compared with the normal group. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NAG, non-atrophic gastritis; AG or IM, atrophy/intestinal metaplasia; FGP, gastric fundus gland polyp; GHP or GIP, hyperplastic/inflammatory gastric polyp; LGIN, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Complex model: All variables were included, and then P values were calculated separately. Simple model: Based on the complex model and the stepwise regression method, an optimal simple model is obtained, which is automatically screened according to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) minimization principle.
Figure 3The result of multivariate logistic regression for the AP group compared with the normal group. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NAG, non-atrophic gastritis; AG or IM, atrophy/intestinal metaplasia; FGP, gastric fundus gland polyps; GHP or GIP, hyperplastic/inflammatory gastric polyps; LGIN, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Complex model: All variables were included, and then P values were calculated separately. Simple model: Based on the complex model and the stepwise regression method, an optimal simple model is obtained, which is automatically screened according to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) minimization principle.
Figure 4The result of multivariate logistic regression for the CRC group compared with the normal group. 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; NAG, non-atrophic gastritis; AG or IM, atrophy/intestinal metaplasia; FGP, gastric fundus gland polyps; GHP or GIP, hyperplastic/inflammatory gastric polyps; LGIN, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. Complex model: All variables were included, and then P values were calculated separately. Simple model: Based on the complex model and the stepwise regression method, an optimal simple model is obtained, which is automatically screened according to the Akaike information criterion (AIC) minimization principle.
The Pearson χ2 test and t test were used to compare the association between various gastric histopathologies and the site, number, and size of AP.
| Site of AP | Number of AP | Size of AP | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Distal | Proximal | Multiple |
| Single | Multiple |
| <1 cm | ≥1 cm |
| |
| Grand total | 705 (100) | 408 (100) | 403 (100) | 778 (100) | 738 (100) | 1,149 (100) | 367 (100) | |||
|
| ||||||||||
| Female | 321 (54.47) | 207 (50.74) | 142 (35.24) |
| 395 (50.77) | 275 (37.26) |
| 533 (46.39) | 137 (37.33) |
|
| Male | 384 (45.53) | 201 (49.26) | 261 (64.76) | 383 (49.23) | 463 (62.74) | 616 (53.61) | 230 (62.67) | |||
| Mean age (SD) | 54.4 (9.77) | 56.0 (8.96) | 58.4 (7.92) |
| 54.3 (9.88) | 57.6 (8.17) |
| 55.2 (9.14) | 57.9 (9.23) |
|
|
| ||||||||||
| NAG | 356 (50.5) | 177 (43.4) | 186 (46.2) | 0.061 | 397 (51.03) | 322 (43.63) |
| 546 (47.5) | 173 (47.1) | 0.947 |
| AG or IM | 277 (39.3) | 170 (41.7) | 162 (40.2) | 0.738 | 294 (37.8) | 315 (42.7) | 0.059 | 464 (40.4) | 145 (39.5) | 0.813 |
|
| 203 (28.8) | 124 (30.4) | 127 (31.5) | 0.620 | 216 (27.8) | 238 (32.2) | 0.064 | 330 (28.7) | 124 (33.8) | 0.075 |
| FGP | 79 (11.2) | 63 (15.4) | 55 (13.6) | 0.116 | 91 (11.7) | 106 (14.4) | 0.142 | 148 (12.9) | 49 (13.4) | 0.885 |
| GHP or GIP | 27 (3.83) | 17 (4.17) | 23 (5.71) | 0.329 | 26 (3.34) | 41 (5.56) |
| 56 (4.87) | 11 (3.00) | 0.169 |
| GAP | 2 (0.28) | 2 (0.49) | 3 (0.74) | 0.430 | 1 (0.13) | 6 (0.81) | 0.063 | 4 (0.35) | 3 (0.82) | 0.370 |
| LGIN | 20 (2.84) | 13 (3.19) | 16 (3.97) | 0.590 | 17 (2.19) | 32 (4.34) |
| 34 (2.96) | 15 (4.09) | 0.371 |
| HGIN | 2 (0.28) | 1 (0.25) | 0 (0.00) | 0.800 | 3 (0.39) | 0 (0.00) | 0.250 | 2 (0.17) | 1 (0.27) | 0.565 |
| SC-patho | 1 (0.14) | 1 (0.25) | 1 (0.25) | 1.000 | 1 (0.13) | 2 (0.27) | 0.615 | 3 (0.26) | 0 (0.00) | 1.000 |
AP, colorectal adenomatous polyps; NAG, non-atrophic gastritis; AG or IM, atrophy/intestinal metaplasia; FGP, gastric fundus gland polyp; GHP or GIP, hyperplastic/inflammatory gastric polyps; GAP, adenomatous gastric polyps; LGIN, low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia; HGIN, high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia; SC-patho, stomach cancer of pathology. P < 0.05 showed in bold.