| Literature DB >> 35874893 |
Abstract
In order to overcome the problem that learners and teachers cannot find instructional resources to meet their needs and information overload in the massive resources, this article proposes and designs a music instructional resource management platform based on DCNN. This article expounds the overall goal, design principle, overall structure, and interface design of the system. At the same time, the whole construction process of a music instructional resources integration system based on DCNN is discussed in detail from the aspects of configuration of development environment, localization of platform interface, and realization of main functions of the system. In addition, through the demand analysis tool, the demand of college music instructional resources management is analyzed in detail and deeply, and the demand document is formed. This article makes an in-depth study on the categories of music instructional resources and summarizes the resource classification methods that are in line with the actual instructional activities. The experiments show that the accuracy of the proposed algorithm is improved by about 6% compared with the fuzzy clustering algorithm. At the same time, the stability of this system can reach 96.14%. This system is rich in functions and easy to use and can provide a feasible scheme for the management of instructional resources in various disciplines.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35874893 PMCID: PMC9300288 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4545125
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Figure 1DL network model.
Figure 2The integration model of music instructional resources based on DCNN.
Test environment.
| Environment | Category | Set up |
|---|---|---|
| Hardware environment | CPU | Dikaryon |
| RAM | 512 MB | |
| Hard disc | 1 TB | |
| Network card | 100/1000 self-adaption | |
|
| ||
| Software environment | System | Windows |
| Browser | IE6.0 up | |
Figure 3Model training.
Figure 4Comparison of accuracy results of different algorithms.
Figure 5MAE comparison of algorithms.
Figure 6Comparison of operation conditions of different systems.
Experimental results of each index.
| Number of experiments | Recall ratio | Precision ratio | Similarity |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 89.64 | 88.61 | 0.164 |
| 2 | 88.79 | 90.31 | 0.157 |
| 3 | 90.12 | 90.02 | 0.172 |
| 4 | 89.95 | 89.97 | 0.153 |
| 5 | 91.34 | 90.18 | 0.159 |
Figure 7Stability of the system.