| Literature DB >> 35874885 |
Yunzhang Xu1,2.
Abstract
Educational reform is essential. The revolution of multimedia technology and network technology is having a profound impact on the traditional teaching system, teaching methods, and training content. The learner-centered online learning model is rapidly developing. Research shows that, based on new media concepts and technology applications, music teaching platforms can be created and researched through limited forms of music teaching in colleges and universities and new media platforms. The survey results of the practice and role of new media in the process of assisting music teaching in colleges and universities show that most students have a positive attitude towards the new media teaching assistant method in public music courses in colleges and universities and are very interested in this method. Students' aesthetic, analytical, expressive, and collaborative abilities are also enhanced at all levels. The average score of the test class was 8.8 points higher than that of the control class, and the average score was 10.78% higher. The results show that the application of new media in college music teaching is effective.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35874885 PMCID: PMC9300290 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9261521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Figure 1Implementation of teachers' application of new media assisted instruction.
Places where teachers teach public music courses in colleges and universities.
| Public music course learning places in colleges and universities | Number of people | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Ordinary classroom | 0 | 0 |
| Multimedia classroom | 50 | 100 |
Whether students are interested in the course of college public music they have studied.
| Very interested | Be interested | Uninterested | Very uninterested | Score rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2 | +1 | −1 | −2 | ||
| Number of people | 14 | 30 | 5 | 1 | 0.51 |
From F1 = 0.510 > 0.5, it can be seen that students are generally interested in the course of public music in colleges and universities.
Can the study time of two class hours a week meet your learning needs of this course?.
| Yes | No | No | Scoring rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| +1 | 0 | −1 | ||
| Number of people | 12 | 7 | 31 | −0.19 |
From F2 = −0.19 < 0, it can be seen that the vast majority of students believe that two class hours are far from meeting their learning needs for the course.
What problems do you think still exist in the teaching and learning of this course?.
| Factor | First place | Second place | Third place | Fourth place | Fifth place | Ranking index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Despite the use of multimedia teaching, teachers are still in a dominant position and students are still in a passive state of learning | 18 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 5 | 0.236 |
|
| ||||||
| There is not enough time for communication between teachers and students | 15 | 17 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0.247 |
|
| ||||||
| The dependence on teachers is too strong, and there is a lack of awareness of knowledge management after class | 4 | 12 | 17 | 9 | 8 | 0.195 |
|
| ||||||
| Teachers' teaching technology and teaching means are relatively backward, and they have not given full play to the advantages of the network | 8 | 6 | 7 | 16 | 13 | 0.175 |
|
| ||||||
| There is no time to reflect or internalize knowledge | 5 | 5 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 0.148 |
What kind of music appreciation class do you like?.
| Focus on explanation | Focus on listening | Guide students to actively participate in the discussion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of people | 9 | 13 | 28 |
| Percentage | 18% | 26% | 56% |
Your requirements for the number of tracks in the limited time of music appreciation class.
| Analyze the famous music in detail so as to master the method of appreciating famous music and seek perfection | Brief explanation of famous music so as to save time, contact more tracks, and widely read | Give consideration to both | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of people | 9 | 20 | 21 |
|
| |||
| Percentage | 18% | 40% | 42% |
What do you think of music appreciation teaching?.
| Combined with video appreciation, the effect is better | Music is the art of hearing | Indifferent | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of people | 29 | 16 | 5 |
| Percentage | 58% | 32% | 10% |
What benefits do you think music lessons can bring you?.
| Factor | First place | Second place | Third place | Fourth place | Ranking index |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Broaden the scope of knowledge | 14 | 17 | 8 | 11 | 0.268 |
| Cultivate sentiment, delight, and elegance | 23 | 18 | 6 | 3 | 0.322 |
| Adjust the tense study life | 7 | 7 | 20 | 16 | 0.21 |
| Changed the way of learning | 6 | 8 | 16 | 20 | 0.2 |
Your satisfaction with public music classes.
| Very satisfied | Satisfied | Basically satisfied | Dissatisfied | Very dissatisfied | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of people | 3 | 7 | 16 | 23 | 1 |
| Percentage | 6% | 14% | 32% | 46% | 2% |
Do you have your own computer in school?.
| Yes | No | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of people | 27 | 15 |
| Percentage | 64.29% | 35.71% |
Can you easily use the computer connected to campus network or the Internet after class?.
| Yes | No | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of people | 40 | 2 |
| Percentage | 95.24% | 4.76% |
Is it important to communicate and discuss with students?.
| Important | Unclear | Unimportant | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Number of people | 36 | 5 | 1 |
| Percentage | 85.71% | 11.90% | 2.38% |
Have you logged in to the music teaching platform?.
| Yes | No | |
|---|---|---|
| Number of people | 42 | 0 |
| Percentage | 100% | 0% |
Monthly frequency of landing on music teaching platform.
| More than 20 times | 15–20 times | 10–15 times | 5–10 times | Less than 5 times | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of people | 4 | 7 | 13 | 17 | 1 |
|
| |||||
| Percentage | 9.52% | 16.67% | 30.95% | 40.48% | 2.38% |
Time of each landing on music teaching platform.
| More than 1 hour | 0.5–1 hour | 15–30 minutes | 5–15 (minutes) | Less than 5 (minutes) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of people | 12 | 19 | 8 | 3 | 0 |
|
| |||||
| Percentage | 28.57% | 45.24% | 19.05% | 7.14% | 0.00% |
Reasons for landing on music teaching platform (multiple choices).
| Teacher's requirements | View useful learning information | Communicate with teachers and students to understand the learning status of other students | Relax tense study life | Hobbies or habits | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of people | 24 | 35 | 31 | 14 | 16 |
|
| |||||
| Percentage | 56.99% | 83.87% | 73.12% | 33.33% | 38.71% |
What are you willing to do after landing on the music teaching platform?.
| View useful learning information and expand your music vision | Exchange learning experience | Ask learning questions | Finish one's homework | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of people | 37 | 23 | 14 | 29 | |
|
| |||||
| Percentage | 88.10% | 54.76% | 33.33% | 69.05% | |
Is it agreed that the application of music teaching platform in the teaching of public art courses can assist learning?.
| Strongly agree | Basically agree | Disagree | Strongly disagree | Scoring rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2 | +1 | −1 | −2 | ||
| Number of people | 22 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 0.690 |
From F1 = 0.690 > 0.5, it can be seen that students generally agree that the application of music teaching platform in the teaching of public art courses is helpful for auxiliary learning.
Whether the music teaching platform has improved compared with traditional classroom teaching.
| Greatly improved | A little improved | Uncertain | Not improved | Down | Scoring rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2 | +1 | 0 | −1 | −2 | ||
| Number of people | 18 | 15 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0.583 |
From F2 > 0.5, it can be seen that students generally hold a positive attitude towards the application of music teaching platform in public music courses, which has greatly improved their music knowledge compared with traditional classroom teaching.
Teaching effect of music teaching platform.
| Very good | Good | Indifferent | Not good | Very bad | Scoring rate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| +2 | +1 | 0 | −1 | −2 | ||
| Number of people | 10 | 22 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0.429 |
From F3 > 0, it can be seen that students have a good teaching method of using music teaching platform in public music courses.
Figure 2Improvement of other abilities after learning on the music teaching platform.
Pretest data and statistical feature analysis of experimental class and control class (pretest).
| Number of people | Average score | Standard deviation | Corresponding quadrant | Statistical characteristics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pretest | Experimental class | 42 | 36.07 | 11.177 | Beta quadrant | The average level is low but scattered, and there are high-score students |
| Control class | 38 | 36.32 | 11.526 | Beta quadrant | The average level is low but scattered, and there are high-score students | |
Pretest Z = −0.070, |Z| < 1.96, so there was no significant difference between the two groups.
Pretest data and statistical characteristic analysis of experimental class and control class (posttest).
| Number of people | Average score | Standard deviation | Corresponding quadrant | Statistical characteristics | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Posttest | Experimental class | 42 | 78.43 | 7.129 | Delta quadrant | The average level is high but relatively concentrated, which is in an excellent state |
| Control class | 38 | 66.74 | 11.135 | First quadrant | The average level is low, but the degree of separation is large, and there is low meristematic | |
Posttest Z = 4.022 > 2.58, so the difference between the two groups is very significant.