| Literature DB >> 35874880 |
Jianshi Liu1,2, Jing Yang3, Hao Zhang4.
Abstract
The construction of sponge cities is a crucial measure for the development of an ecologically sensitive urban civilization in China, but a systematic and comprehensive construction control target has not yet been established. Considering the Nanjing Jiangbei New District as an example, this article explores how to decompose the control objectives of stormwater management in urban regions into four levels, namely, urban areas, control planning units, implementation plots, and individual technical measures, which will form the basis for the design of sponge cities. The findings of this study are expected to serve as a reference for other regions of China in the design of rainwater management systems, which form the structural backbone of the sponge cities.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35874880 PMCID: PMC9303479 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2209161
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Environ Public Health ISSN: 1687-9805
Figure 1Location of nanjing jiangbei new district.
Figure 2Research process.
Figure 3The zoning map of the total annual runoff control rate in mainland China.
Figure 4Water system distribution map of Nanjing Jiangbei New District.
Figure 5Division of rain and flood management units in Nanjing Jiangbei New District.
Figure 6Evaluation of population density factors in Nanjing Jiangbei New District.
Figure 7Evaluation map of spatial integration factors in Nanjing Jiangbei New District.
Figure 8Evaluation of green space system factors in Nanjing Jiangbei New District.
Figure 9Comprehensive evaluation of the suitability of sponge city construction in Nanjing Jiangbei New District.
Sponge city construction suitability adjustment coefficient p1 in the planning unit of Jiangbei New District.
| Suitability of sponge city construction | Unsuitable | Less suitable | Suitable | More suitable (%) | Most suitable (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Suitability adjustment factor | −10% | −5% | 0 | 5 | 10 |
Figure 10The technical route for the decomposition of the total annual runoff control target of the planning unit.
Runoff coefficient of each land type [15].
| Land type | Runoff coefficient | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | Green roof | 0.4 |
| Hardened roof | 0.85 | |
| Road square | Permeable | 0.15 |
| Impermeable | 0.85 | |
| Green space | 0.15 | |
| Public municipal | 0.85 | |
| Waters | 1 | |
Estimation of comprehensive surface runoff coefficient of d010 plot.
| Land type | Percentage | Runoff coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residential | Green roof | 4.79 | 0.4 |
| Hardened roof | 11.18 | 0.85 | |
| Road square | Permeable | 19.5 | 0.15 |
| Impermeable | 21.58 | 0.85 | |
| Green space | 36.67 | 0.15 | |
| Public municipal | 1.38 | 0.85 | |
| Waters | 4.91 | 1 | |
| Comprehensive surface runoff coefficient | 0.443 | ||
Figure 11The urban construction land plan of block d010 in the central area of Nanjing Jiangbei New District.
Estimation of comprehensive surface runoff coefficient of residential land in d010 plot.
| Land type | Percentage | Runoff coefficient | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residential | Green roof | 7.5 | 0.4 |
| Hardened roof | 17.5 | 0.85 | |
| Road square | Permeable | 31.5 | 0.15 |
| Impermeable | 13.5 | 0.85 | |
| Green space | 30 | 0.15 | |
| Comprehensive surface runoff coefficient | 0.386 | ||
The total annual runoff control rate corresponding to the design rainfall in Nanjing.
| Annual runoff control rate | 35% | 40% | 45% | 50% | 55% | 60% | 65% | 70% | 75% | 80% | 85% | 90% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Designed rainfall (mm) | 6.2 | 7.5 | 9.0 | 10.7 | 12.6 | 14.8 | 17.4 | 20.6 | 24.8 | 29.8 | 36.8 | 48.4 |
Note. The data are from China Meteorological Administration 1981–2015.
Figure 12The total annual runoff control rate in Nanjing City corresponded to the design rainfall.
Single index requirements for low-impact development of residential land in d010 block.
| Single control index | Notice of the General Office of the State Council on doing a good job in the construction of urban drainage and prevention facilities. State Office issued (2013) No. 23 | “Technical Specification for Rainwater Utilization Engineering in Buildings and Residential Areas” | “Outdoor Drainage Design Plan” (GB 50014-2006) | Notice of the General Office of the Provincial Government on implementing the Notice of the General Office of the State Council on doing a good job in the construction of urban drainage and waterlogging prevention facilities Suzhou Provincial Government Office issued (2013) No. 88 | Notice on issuing “Technical Guidelines for Comprehensive Utilization of Rainwater in Nanjing City (Implementation)” Nanjing Construction and Environment Agency (Implementation) Nanjing (2014) No. 612 | Implementation opinions on promoting the construction of sponge city (submission for examination) Municipal Construction Committee | |
|
| |||||||
| Permeable area ratio | No less than 40% | Among the hardened ground in the newly built urban area, the percentage of permeable ground area should not be less than 40% | Permeable ground should be used on hard ground and squares where pedestrians and nonmotor vehicles pass | Among the hardened ground in the newly built urban area, the percentage of permeable ground area should not be less than 40% | Among the hardened ground in the newly built urban area, the percentage of permeable ground area should not be less than 40% | — | Residential area: in the hardened ground, the permeability shall not be less than 40%; Road: the permeable paving rate of the newly built sidewalk is 50%, and the rebuilding rate is 30%; Park: Pedestrian system, parking lot, and other facilities adopt permeable pavement. The permeable pavement rate of new parks should not be less than 50% |
|
| |||||||
| Sunken green space | No less than 10% | — | The road surface in the residential section should be 50–100 mm higher than the roadside green space | The elevation of the green space should be 5–25 cm lower than the elevation of the surrounding ground to form a recessed green space | — | For all construction projects that involve the requirements of the green space rate index, 30% of the green space should be used as a recessed green space for retaining rainwater | For all construction projects that involve the requirements of the green space rate index, at least 10% of the green space should be used as recessed green space for retaining rainwater, and the green space in urban parks should not be less than 30% recessed |
|
| |||||||
| Regulation and storage facilities | No less than 100 m3/ha | — | — | — | Urban construction should pay attention to rainwater collection and utilization, with a construction standard of 100 m3/ha | For new buildings with a planned construction land area of more than 20,000 square meters, a rainwater collection and utilization system must be built; the standard is 100 m3/10,000 m2 | The planned construction land of 20,000 square meters shall be equipped with a rainwater collection and utilization system |
Single index requirements for low-impact development of residential land in d010 plot.
| Control index | High-end residential area | Ordinary residential area, guaranteed housing | Municipal roads |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subsidence green rate | ≥ 15% | ≥ 10% | ≥ 30% |
| Green roof rate | 20%–50% | — | — |
| Permeable pavement rate | ≥ 90% | ≥ 70% | ≥ 90% |
| Regulation and storage facilities | Every 10,000 square meters of the hardened area is equipped with a rainwater storage facility of not less than 300 m3 | — | |
Advantages and disadvantages of main low-impact development measures.
| Technical measures | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Permeable paving | Wide application area, convenient construction, can replenish groundwater and have a certain peak flow reduction and rainwater purification effect | Easy to block, cold areas are at risk of being destroyed by freezing and thawing |
| Green roof | Can effectively reduce the total amount of roof runoff and runoff pollution load | There are strict requirements on roof load, waterproofing, slope, space conditions, etc. |
| Sunken green space | Wide application area, its construction cost and maintenance cost are low | Easily affected by terrain and other conditions, the actual regulation and storage volume is small |
| Biological retention facility | Various forms, wide application area, easy to integrate with the landscape, good runoff control effect, low construction and maintenance costs | In areas with high groundwater levels and rock layers, poor soil permeability, and steep terrain, necessary measures such as soil replacement, seepage prevention, and ladder installation should be taken to avoid secondary disasters, which will increase construction costs. |
| Permeation pond | Can effectively supplement groundwater, reduce peak flow, and lower construction costs | Strict requirements for site conditions and high requirements for later maintenance and management |
| Seepage well | Small footprint, low construction and maintenance costs | The water quality and quantity control effects are limited |
| Wet pond | It can effectively reduce the total amount of runoff, runoff pollution, and peak flow in a larger area | Strict requirements for on-site conditions, high construction and maintenance costs |
| Rainwater wetland | Can effectively reduce pollutants, has a certain runoff and peak flow control effect | Higher construction and maintenance costs |
| Reservoir | It has the advantages of saving land, easy access to rainwater pipes, avoiding direct sunlight, preventing mosquitoes and flies, and storing large amounts of water. Rainwater can be reused for green irrigation, washing roads and vehicles, etc. | The construction cost is high, and maintenance and management should be paid attention in the later period |
| Rainwater tank | Mostly molded products, convenient for construction and installation, and easy for maintenance | The storage volume is small, and rainwater purification capacity is limited |
| Regulating pond | Can effectively reduce peak traffic, lower construction and maintenance costs | The function is relatively simple |
| Regulating pool | Can effectively reduce peak traffic | The function is simple, high construction and maintenance costs |
| Grassed swales | Low construction and maintenance costs, easy to integrate with the landscape | Areas such as built urban areas and newly built urban areas with greater development intensity are vulnerable to site conditions |
| Seepage pipe/drain | Small space requirements for the site | The construction cost is high, it gets blocked easily, and is difficult to maintain |
| Vegetation buffer zone | Low construction and maintenance costs | High requirements for site space, slope, and other conditions, and limited runoff control effects |
| Initial rainwater discarding facility | Small footprint and low construction costs, which can reduce the maintenance and management costs of rainwater storage and rainwater purification facilities | Runoff pollutants and discarded flow are generally not easy to control |
| Artificial soil infiltration | Infiltration rainwater purification effect is good, easy to integrate with the landscape | High construction costs |
Comparison of low-impact development facilities.
| Single facility | Functions | Control objectives | Solving method | Economy | Economy | Pollutant removal rate (calculated by SS,%) | Landscape effect | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collecting and storing rainwater | Supplementing groundwater | Reducing peak flow | Purifying rainwater | Transmission | Total runoff | Peak runoff | Runoff pollution | Dispersion | Relatively concentrated | Construction costs | Maintenance costs | |||
| Permeable brick paving | ○ | ● | ◎ | ◎ | ○ | ● | ◎ | ◎ | √ | - | Low | Low | 80-90 | - |
| Permeable cement concrete | ○ | ○ | ◎ | ◎ | ○ | ◎ | ◎ | ◎ | √ | - | High | Medium | 80-90 | - |
| Permeable asphalt concrete | ○ | ○ | ◎ | ◎ | ○ | ◎ | ◎ | ◎ | √ | - | High | Medium | 80-90 | - |
| Green roof | ○ | ○ | ◎ | ◎ | ○ | ● | ◎ | ◎ | √ | - | High | Medium | 70-80 | Good |
| Sunken green space | ○ | ● | ◎ | ◎ | ○ | ● | ◎ | ◎ | √ | - | Low | Low | - | Fair |
| Simple biological retention facility | ○ | ● | ◎ | ◎ | ○ | ● | ◎ | ◎ | √ | - | Low | Low | - | Good |
| Complex biological retention facility | ○ | ● | ◎ | ● | ○ | ● | ◎ | ● | √ | - | Medium | Low | 70-95 | Good |
| Permeation pond | ○ | ● | ◎ | ◎ | ○ | ● | ◎ | ◎ | - | √ | Medium | Medium | 70-80 | Fair |
| Seepage well | ○ | ● | ◎ | ◎ | ○ | ● | ◎ | ◎ | √ | √ | Low | Low | - | - |
| Wet pond | ● | ○ | ● | ◎ | ○ | ● | ● | ◎ | - | √ | High | Medium | 50-80 | Good |
| Rain wetland | ● | ○ | ● | ● | ○ | ● | ● | ● | √ | √ | High | Medium | 50-80 | Good |
| Reservoir | ● | ○ | ◎ | ◎ | ○ | ● | ◎ | ◎ | - | √ | High | Medium | 80-90 | - |
| Rainwater tank | ● | ○ | ◎ | ◎ | ○ | ● | ◎ | ◎ | √ | - | Low | Low | 80-90 | - |
| Regulating pond | ○ | ○ | ● | ◎ | ○ | ● | ● | ◎ | - | √ | High | Medium | - | Fair |
| Regulation pool | ○ | ○ | ● | ○ | ○ | ● | ● | ○ | - | √ | High | Medium | - | - |
| Transmission type grassed swales | ◎ | ○ | ○ | ◎ | ● | ○ | ○ | ◎ | √ | - | Low | Low | 35-90 | Fair |
| Dry grassed swales | ○ | ● | ○ | ◎ | ● | ○ | ○ | ◎ | √ | - | Low | Low | 35-90 | Good |
| Wet grassed swales | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | ● | ◎ | ○ | ● | √ | - | Medium | Low | - | Good |
| Seepage pipe/drain | ○ | ◎ | ○ | ○ | ● | ● | ○ | ◎ | √ | - | Medium | Medium | 35-70 | - |
| Vegetation buffer zone | ○ | ○ | ○ | ● | - | ○ | ○ | ● | √ | - | Low | Low | 50-75 | Fair |
| Initial rainwater discarding facility | ◎ | ○ | ○ | ● | - | ○ | ○ | ● | √ | - | Low | Medium | 40-60 | - |
| Artificial soil infiltration | ● | ○ | ○ | ● | - | ○ | ○ | ◎ | - | √ | High | Medium | 75-95 | Good |
Note. ●-Strong ◎-Relatively strong ○-Weak or very small; The 2SS removal rate data come from the research data of the Center for Watershed Protection (CWP) of the United States.